1) Circular geometry of emotion representations
2) Steering: unlike Anthropic, we steer along circular manifold (at 0°, 30°, 60°...)
3) Steering emotions can affect refusal/sycophancy
See Lihao's thread!👇
Woke up to Anthropic's emotion paper and realized “wait, that's our finding too.”
We concurrently uncovered a circular valence & arousal (VA) geometry of emotions, steering refusal & sycophancy. We further provide a mechanistic account: tokens occupy distinct regions in this space.
1/
1) Circular geometry of emotion representations
2) Steering: unlike Anthropic, we steer along circular manifold (at 0°, 30°, 60°...)
3) Steering emotions can affect refusal/sycophancy
See Lihao's thread!👇
July 2026, Seoul 🇰🇷
The workshop aims to understand the inner workings of neural nets.
Topics:
Feature geometry
Circuit analyses
Interp for {practical applications, safety, scientific discovery}, and many more.
July 2026, Seoul 🇰🇷
The workshop aims to understand the inner workings of neural nets.
Topics:
Feature geometry
Circuit analyses
Interp for {practical applications, safety, scientific discovery}, and many more.
- a coauthor had his reviews re-assigned many weeks ago. The ACs of those papers told him "i've been told to tell u: leave a short note. You won't be penalized". Now I'm being warned of desk-reject due to his short/poor reviews. What's the right protocol here?
- a coauthor had his reviews re-assigned many weeks ago. The ACs of those papers told him "i've been told to tell u: leave a short note. You won't be penalized". Now I'm being warned of desk-reject due to his short/poor reviews. What's the right protocol here?
We reverse-engineered how LLaMA-3-70B-Instruct handles a belief-tracking task and found something surprising: it uses mechanisms strikingly similar to pointer variables in C programming!
We reverse-engineered how LLaMA-3-70B-Instruct handles a belief-tracking task and found something surprising: it uses mechanisms strikingly similar to pointer variables in C programming!
Today’s “safe” language models can look unbiased—but alignment can actually make them more biased implicitly by reducing their sensitivity to race-related associations.
🧵Find out more below!
Today’s “safe” language models can look unbiased—but alignment can actually make them more biased implicitly by reducing their sensitivity to race-related associations.
🧵Find out more below!
How do reasoning models verify their own CoT?
We reverse-engineer LMs and find critical components and subspaces needed for self-verification!
1/n
How do reasoning models verify their own CoT?
We reverse-engineer LMs and find critical components and subspaces needed for self-verification!
1/n
It is called ARBOR:
arborproject.github.io/
please join us.
bsky.app/profile/ajy...
It is called ARBOR:
arborproject.github.io/
please join us.
bsky.app/profile/ajy...
Join ARBOR: Analysis of Reasoning Behaviors thru *Open Research* - a radically open collaboration to reverse-engineer reasoning models!
Learn more: arborproject.github.io
1/N
Join ARBOR: Analysis of Reasoning Behaviors thru *Open Research* - a radically open collaboration to reverse-engineer reasoning models!
Learn more: arborproject.github.io
1/N
Interested in inference-time scaling? In-context Learning? Mech Interp?
LMs can solve novel in-context tasks, with sufficient examples (longer contexts). Why? Bc they dynamically form *in-context representations*!
1/N
Interested in inference-time scaling? In-context Learning? Mech Interp?
LMs can solve novel in-context tasks, with sufficient examples (longer contexts). Why? Bc they dynamically form *in-context representations*!
1/N