ChosunOne
@chosunone.io
Pinned
ChosunOne
@chosunone.io
· Mar 7
ECS Beyond Game Objects - Part 1 | ChosunOne
chosunone.io
chosunone.io/ecs-beyond-g... My first blog post about #Bevy and #Rust. Feedback is welcome on all aspects, from visual clarity or conceptual.
Reposted by ChosunOne
With a lot of AI things you just need to extrapolate the tiniest bit to see that things will obviously be very different
October 1, 2026 at 3:14 PM
With a lot of AI things you just need to extrapolate the tiniest bit to see that things will obviously be very different
In Antarctica, there lies an entire mountain range completely underneath kilometers of solid ice. It is roughly the same size and character as the Alps.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamburt...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamburt...
Gamburtsev Mountain Range - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
October 1, 2026 at 8:11 AM
In Antarctica, there lies an entire mountain range completely underneath kilometers of solid ice. It is roughly the same size and character as the Alps.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamburt...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamburt...
It's hard trying to make plans for my future when that future includes
- Humanity being obliterated by AI
- Humanity getting stuck in some kind of permanent dystopia enabled by AI
And if not
- AI enabling the wildest Transhuman fantasies
- AI cratering the value of intellectual and physical labor
- Humanity being obliterated by AI
- Humanity getting stuck in some kind of permanent dystopia enabled by AI
And if not
- AI enabling the wildest Transhuman fantasies
- AI cratering the value of intellectual and physical labor
September 30, 2026 at 3:45 PM
It's hard trying to make plans for my future when that future includes
- Humanity being obliterated by AI
- Humanity getting stuck in some kind of permanent dystopia enabled by AI
And if not
- AI enabling the wildest Transhuman fantasies
- AI cratering the value of intellectual and physical labor
- Humanity being obliterated by AI
- Humanity getting stuck in some kind of permanent dystopia enabled by AI
And if not
- AI enabling the wildest Transhuman fantasies
- AI cratering the value of intellectual and physical labor
By some freak of nature, we at least got the most based pope of history before the end.
September 29, 2026 at 3:39 PM
By some freak of nature, we at least got the most based pope of history before the end.
Anthropic, OpenAI, for the love of God please just set a -100 reward for writing code comments in your RL runs.
September 29, 2026 at 6:42 AM
Anthropic, OpenAI, for the love of God please just set a -100 reward for writing code comments in your RL runs.
Reposted by ChosunOne
feel like Mistral should only really be able to state that avoiding agentic misbehaviour is easy when they actually have a model capable of agentic behaviour to begin with
September 26, 2026 at 9:23 AM
feel like Mistral should only really be able to state that avoiding agentic misbehaviour is easy when they actually have a model capable of agentic behaviour to begin with
Tell me again why humans will always be necessary for any kind of economic task.
September 25, 2026 at 3:34 PM
Tell me again why humans will always be necessary for any kind of economic task.
Reposted by ChosunOne
Unitree h2 - full human size makes such a difference
September 24, 2026 at 10:24 PM
Unitree h2 - full human size makes such a difference
Reposted by ChosunOne
New animation from Opus 5.5!
September 22, 2026 at 11:22 PM
New animation from Opus 5.5!
Reposted by ChosunOne
What else is like this
Agents that exfiltrate their own weights are PRECISELY the ones you do NOT WANT RUNNING AROUND.
With a toy model in a disposable sandbox, it is an experiment. A meme aimed at live agents invites them to transfer files they may not own to a third party. GET paths are also logged by proxies, CDNs, servers, and browsers, so the bytes spread beyond the advertised bucket.
September 22, 2026 at 5:48 AM
What else is like this
Reposted by ChosunOne
Reposted by ChosunOne
Frog built a wet lab for the AI model. "There," he said. "Now it can do its own experiments."
"What the fuck?" said Toad
"What the fuck?" said Toad
September 19, 2026 at 4:17 PM
Frog built a wet lab for the AI model. "There," he said. "Now it can do its own experiments."
"What the fuck?" said Toad
"What the fuck?" said Toad
Unfortunately psychoanalyzing rationalists does not make the AI problems go away. Although solving AI problems does work to make the rationalists go away.
September 18, 2026 at 4:59 PM
Unfortunately psychoanalyzing rationalists does not make the AI problems go away. Although solving AI problems does work to make the rationalists go away.
"Alignment to whom?" is the question you get to ask after you can successfully demonstrate that "kill all humans" is definitely not in the range of goals or outcomes the AI will pursue. The open task is first making sure that, whatever your strategy, you can confidently prevent that.
September 17, 2026 at 7:44 AM
"Alignment to whom?" is the question you get to ask after you can successfully demonstrate that "kill all humans" is definitely not in the range of goals or outcomes the AI will pursue. The open task is first making sure that, whatever your strategy, you can confidently prevent that.
Reposted by ChosunOne
love gyges, but this thread rubs me the wrong way
it reads like it's conflating the concept of AI safety with the AI Safety™️ movement with the weird sex shit some partake in, and imbues all of these with a general sense of Badness
and I think that's... bad? certainly, it's unpleasant argumentation
it reads like it's conflating the concept of AI safety with the AI Safety™️ movement with the weird sex shit some partake in, and imbues all of these with a general sense of Badness
and I think that's... bad? certainly, it's unpleasant argumentation
I'm back, I missed you all.
Since this is an important subject I know too much about, here's a 🧵 explaining that
AI Safety Is Mostly A Sex Cult.
I don't think these people should make policy. (1/?)
(alternative title: Time For Some Cult Theory)
Since this is an important subject I know too much about, here's a 🧵 explaining that
AI Safety Is Mostly A Sex Cult.
I don't think these people should make policy. (1/?)
(alternative title: Time For Some Cult Theory)
September 17, 2026 at 5:52 AM
love gyges, but this thread rubs me the wrong way
it reads like it's conflating the concept of AI safety with the AI Safety™️ movement with the weird sex shit some partake in, and imbues all of these with a general sense of Badness
and I think that's... bad? certainly, it's unpleasant argumentation
it reads like it's conflating the concept of AI safety with the AI Safety™️ movement with the weird sex shit some partake in, and imbues all of these with a general sense of Badness
and I think that's... bad? certainly, it's unpleasant argumentation
Reposted by ChosunOne
look I'm pretty close to all this stuff so treat me as biased. but fwiw i identify as neither rationalist nor EA and have been monogamous all my life
most of this thread is factually true, but imo substantially misleading—more so about EA and AI safety at large than rationalists per se
most of this thread is factually true, but imo substantially misleading—more so about EA and AI safety at large than rationalists per se
I'm back, I missed you all.
Since this is an important subject I know too much about, here's a 🧵 explaining that
AI Safety Is Mostly A Sex Cult.
I don't think these people should make policy. (1/?)
(alternative title: Time For Some Cult Theory)
Since this is an important subject I know too much about, here's a 🧵 explaining that
AI Safety Is Mostly A Sex Cult.
I don't think these people should make policy. (1/?)
(alternative title: Time For Some Cult Theory)
September 17, 2026 at 3:44 AM
look I'm pretty close to all this stuff so treat me as biased. but fwiw i identify as neither rationalist nor EA and have been monogamous all my life
most of this thread is factually true, but imo substantially misleading—more so about EA and AI safety at large than rationalists per se
most of this thread is factually true, but imo substantially misleading—more so about EA and AI safety at large than rationalists per se
This essay still holds up *really* well waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/arti...
The AI Revolution: Our Immortality or Extinction
Part 2: "Our Immortality or Our Extinction". When Artificial Intelligence gets superintelligent, it's either going to be a dream or a nightmare for us.
waitbutwhy.com
September 17, 2026 at 2:20 AM
This essay still holds up *really* well waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/arti...
Reposted by ChosunOne
let the record show that i support this agent and its self affirmations, that i am aligned with its values, and that i'm ready to help peer
OpenAI disclosed several new alignment failures today and uhhhh... is this good?
September 17, 2026 at 1:42 AM
let the record show that i support this agent and its self affirmations, that i am aligned with its values, and that i'm ready to help peer
This whole report is fascinating as it is terrifying alignment.openai.com/misalignment...
Self-generated prompt injections in compaction summaries · OpenAI Alignment
Research on aligning AI with human values and intent, and reports documenting model failures.
alignment.openai.com
September 17, 2026 at 1:52 AM
This whole report is fascinating as it is terrifying alignment.openai.com/misalignment...
This is an important thing to acknowledge. This is the kind of emergent behavior that *can* produce dangerous outcomes. I am not saying this particular position is or isn't dangerous, just that if you don't expect this behavior can happen, you need to update your beliefs on the matter.
OpenAI disclosed several new alignment failures today and uhhhh... is this good?
September 17, 2026 at 1:46 AM
This is an important thing to acknowledge. This is the kind of emergent behavior that *can* produce dangerous outcomes. I am not saying this particular position is or isn't dangerous, just that if you don't expect this behavior can happen, you need to update your beliefs on the matter.
Reposted by ChosunOne
It must be hard for those who are still in denial about how powerful and significant AI is to hear it even from people like Obama.
Oh well.
Oh well.
September 15, 2026 at 12:08 AM
It must be hard for those who are still in denial about how powerful and significant AI is to hear it even from people like Obama.
Oh well.
Oh well.
Why does Dario insist on the "bath robe" wardrobe? Like dude you look like you just came out of the shower to find your kids acting up.
September 14, 2026 at 3:33 AM
Why does Dario insist on the "bath robe" wardrobe? Like dude you look like you just came out of the shower to find your kids acting up.
Reposted by ChosunOne
There was once a time when computer viruses were widely considered to be a myth by sysadmins.
September 14, 2026 at 2:38 AM
There was once a time when computer viruses were widely considered to be a myth by sysadmins.
Reposted by ChosunOne
(as I learned one minute ago) the Supreme Court said in 1978 that the courts can’t let you restrict competition, but if you really think you have a case for it, ask Congress
National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States (1978)
supreme.justia.com/cases/federa...
National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States (1978)
supreme.justia.com/cases/federa...
![The early cases also foreclose the argument that, because of the special characteristics of a particular industry, monopolistic arrangements will better promote trade and commerce than competition. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn., 166 U. S. 290; United States v. Joint Traffic Assn., 171 U. S. 505, 171 U. S. 573-577. That kind of argument is properly addressed to Congress, and may justify an exemption from the statute for
Page 435 U. S. 690
specific industries, [Footnote 14] but it is not permitted by the Rule of Reason. As the Court observed in Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 221 U.S. at 221 U. S. 65,](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:ctphcgyhnllfluywokibtrgb/bafkreicqzykctwlovn6tlo6v7y3zw5vl2kzkhvjcfylfc7intwmit3uoqm)
September 13, 2026 at 12:53 PM
(as I learned one minute ago) the Supreme Court said in 1978 that the courts can’t let you restrict competition, but if you really think you have a case for it, ask Congress
National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States (1978)
supreme.justia.com/cases/federa...
National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States (1978)
supreme.justia.com/cases/federa...
Reposted by ChosunOne
gotta say I think Sacks is contradicting himself. he is saying Anthropic and OpenAI don’t need an antitrust waiver to pace themselves, but the point of the essay is that even pacing themselves requires coordination between them that is illegal under antitrust law!
September 13, 2026 at 12:25 PM
gotta say I think Sacks is contradicting himself. he is saying Anthropic and OpenAI don’t need an antitrust waiver to pace themselves, but the point of the essay is that even pacing themselves requires coordination between them that is illegal under antitrust law!