📈Learn To Read F1 Telemetry Data
⚙️ Performance Engineer, PhD in Motorcycle Dynamics
Places to find me: linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Thank you so much 🥹💙🦋
Aston and Audi were the worst cars off the line by far: something to improve on
Aston and Audi were the worst cars off the line by far: something to improve on
🟥LEC's pace was within 0.1s of 🟦 VER's, yet he finished the race 24.8s behind him!
What a pity, replacing Spa with this track ☹️
🟥LEC's pace was within 0.1s of 🟦 VER's, yet he finished the race 24.8s behind him!
What a pity, replacing Spa with this track ☹️
OCO ran the standard engine, BEA the upgraded one
In quali, BEA accelerated harder at EVERY SPEED: 15.4hp required to explain that gap
OCO ran the standard engine, BEA the upgraded one
In quali, BEA accelerated harder at EVERY SPEED: 15.4hp required to explain that gap
The average team lost ~3s to 2025
Having a powerful PU was critical:
-Alpine switched from Renault to Mercedes, losing less than 1.8s/lap.
-Aston went from Mercedes to Honda, losing more than triple that!
The average team lost ~3s to 2025
Having a powerful PU was critical:
-Alpine switched from Renault to Mercedes, losing less than 1.8s/lap.
-Aston went from Mercedes to Honda, losing more than triple that!
No car could match Mercedes on pace, even after correcting for Antonelli's extra set of tyres!
-NOR was next fastest, P8 → P4
-VER and HAM had similar pace; HAM's clash with LEC likely cost him points
-Alpine best of the rest
-Cadillac worst by far
[Via JMP #YesJMPCan]
No car could match Mercedes on pace, even after correcting for Antonelli's extra set of tyres!
-NOR was next fastest, P8 → P4
-VER and HAM had similar pace; HAM's clash with LEC likely cost him points
-Alpine best of the rest
-Cadillac worst by far
[Via JMP #YesJMPCan]
Top speed in Monza was "just" 351 km/h, 6 km/h less than at the low-speed Hungaroring!
Read on 👇
Top speed in Monza was "just" 351 km/h, 6 km/h less than at the low-speed Hungaroring!
Read on 👇
RUS was quickest for over half the lap, yet GAS beat him to pole despite only being quickest in T4-5 (Seconda Variante), before T8 (Ascari), and right before T11 (Parabolica). He was rarely fastest, but never slow: consistency got him on pole!
RUS was quickest for over half the lap, yet GAS beat him to pole despite only being quickest in T4-5 (Seconda Variante), before T8 (Ascari), and right before T11 (Parabolica). He was rarely fastest, but never slow: consistency got him on pole!
24 km/h between Russell (343 km/h) and Alonso (319 km/h): not reaching 320 km/h AT MONZA, despite active aero, says a lot about Honda's still-lacking power
Highest top speeds → best performance (GAS, RUS front row)
24 km/h between Russell (343 km/h) and Alonso (319 km/h): not reaching 320 km/h AT MONZA, despite active aero, says a lot about Honda's still-lacking power
Highest top speeds → best performance (GAS, RUS front row)
Aston will struggle despite the updates
#F1 #ItalianGP
Aston will struggle despite the updates
#F1 #ItalianGP
• Similar peak power (🟢Arrows: similar early-straight acceleration)
• Deployment lasts less, resulting in 🟡lower mid-straight speed
• Similar peak power (🟢Arrows: similar early-straight acceleration)
• Deployment lasts less, resulting in 🟡lower mid-straight speed
It now covers a much smaller area, both laterally (red arrows) and at the centre (yellow arrow)
The wing generates rear downforce at the cost of more drag and less power.
[📸: @carpentiers_f1 on X] #F1
It now covers a much smaller area, both laterally (red arrows) and at the centre (yellow arrow)
The wing generates rear downforce at the cost of more drag and less power.
[📸: @carpentiers_f1 on X] #F1
🗒️Key points:
-Mercedes: +7.3 hp vs RBPT
-ADUO upgrades: Ferrari gained 9.6 hp (1/5 of its deficit), Audi 7.6 hp, Honda 11.4 hp
Full article! 👇
🗒️Key points:
-Mercedes: +7.3 hp vs RBPT
-ADUO upgrades: Ferrari gained 9.6 hp (1/5 of its deficit), Audi 7.6 hp, Honda 11.4 hp
Full article! 👇
📊Useful stats about 2026 cars:
•+6km/h median over 2025
•Less variable top speed track-to-track (Max ERS power must decrease above 337km/h → 'rubber-band effect'
•We already reached 360 km/h in Barcelona
Via JMP #YesJMPCan #F1
📊Useful stats about 2026 cars:
•+6km/h median over 2025
•Less variable top speed track-to-track (Max ERS power must decrease above 337km/h → 'rubber-band effect'
•We already reached 360 km/h in Barcelona
Via JMP #YesJMPCan #F1
📊Useful stats about 2026 cars:
•+6km/h median over 2025
•Less variable top speed track-to-track (Max ERS power must decrease above 337km/h → 'rubber-band effect'
•We already reached 360 km/h in Barcelona
Via JMP #YesJMPCan #F1
📊Useful stats about 2026 cars:
•+6km/h median over 2025
•Less variable top speed track-to-track (Max ERS power must decrease above 337km/h → 'rubber-band effect'
•We already reached 360 km/h in Barcelona
Via JMP #YesJMPCan #F1
RUS was worst off the line: high RPM sent the rears spinning, costing him a place to ANT
HAM lifted to avoid rear-ending LEC! #F1
RUS was worst off the line: high RPM sent the rears spinning, costing him a place to ANT
HAM lifted to avoid rear-ending LEC! #F1
⚪️HARD: Ferrari > Mercedes > McL
🟡MEDIUM: Ferrari > Mercedes > RBR
🔴SOFT: Mercedes > McL > Ferrari >> RBR
Ferrari was quickest on the harder compounds, while Mercedes had the lowest wear. This reversed on the softs: Mercedes was quickest, but with worse wear #F1
⚪️HARD: Ferrari > Mercedes > McL
🟡MEDIUM: Ferrari > Mercedes > RBR
🔴SOFT: Mercedes > McL > Ferrari >> RBR
Ferrari was quickest on the harder compounds, while Mercedes had the lowest wear. This reversed on the softs: Mercedes was quickest, but with worse wear #F1
ANT used one more set (4) compared to NOR, yet he was no quicker: that’s why he won comfortably!
LEC was as quick as ANT, using as many sets: Ferrari threw away a great result by botching quali for both Sprint and Race!
ALO’s good pace won him 2 points: he used just TWO sets! 👌
ANT used one more set (4) compared to NOR, yet he was no quicker: that’s why he won comfortably!
LEC was as quick as ANT, using as many sets: Ferrari threw away a great result by botching quali for both Sprint and Race!
ALO’s good pace won him 2 points: he used just TWO sets! 👌
Not only was LEC quickest (marginally), but he had better degradation on the Softs than Mercedes and McL had on the Mediums!
HAM and the two Red Bulls had better deg than Merc/McL
GAS and BOR were best of the rest
Aston was close to Haas, and ahead of Williams and Cadillac
Not only was LEC quickest (marginally), but he had better degradation on the Softs than Mercedes and McL had on the Mediums!
HAM and the two Red Bulls had better deg than Merc/McL
GAS and BOR were best of the rest
Aston was close to Haas, and ahead of Williams and Cadillac
NOR and LEC were fastest through the fastest corner; a weaker PU held LEC back
🟦VER's RBR couldn't match the pace of the others
#F1
NOR and LEC were fastest through the fastest corner; a weaker PU held LEC back
🟦VER's RBR couldn't match the pace of the others
#F1
1)Comment with your answer (then check the comments if you want, but not before! No cheating)
2)Tag a friend who will 100% get it wrong ❌
Previous one was Bahrain Outer Circuit! (2020 Sakhir GP)
1)Comment with your answer (then check the comments if you want, but not before! No cheating)
2)Tag a friend who will 100% get it wrong ❌
Previous one was Bahrain Outer Circuit! (2020 Sakhir GP)
1)Comment with your answer (then check the comments if you want, but not before! No cheating)
2)Tag a friend who will 100% get it wrong ❌
1)Comment with your answer (then check the comments if you want, but not before! No cheating)
2)Tag a friend who will 100% get it wrong ❌
•Engine: displacement and cylinders, hybrid or not, turbocharged vs naturally aspirated
•Chassis: active vs passive aero, ground effect vs flat floors
•Tyres: single manufacturer vs tyre war
•Refuelling: yes or no?
•Overtake aids: yes or no?
Comment!
•Engine: displacement and cylinders, hybrid or not, turbocharged vs naturally aspirated
•Chassis: active vs passive aero, ground effect vs flat floors
•Tyres: single manufacturer vs tyre war
•Refuelling: yes or no?
•Overtake aids: yes or no?
Comment!
Best development: Williams (-3.315s)
Worst: Ferrari (-1.464s), best car at the start of '22, only 4th best by '25
Best development: Williams (-3.315s)
Worst: Ferrari (-1.464s), best car at the start of '22, only 4th best by '25
Best development: Williams (-3.315s)
Worst: Ferrari (-1.464s), best car at the start of '22, only 4th best by '25
Best development: Williams (-3.315s)
Worst: Ferrari (-1.464s), best car at the start of '22, only 4th best by '25