We were lucky to have Prof. Prokopenko visit us (with Ricard Solé @ricardsole.bsky.social ) in Barcelona in July and talk about it.
Cool stuff! @frosas.bsky.social
arxiv.org/abs/2409.12029
We were lucky to have Prof. Prokopenko visit us (with Ricard Solé @ricardsole.bsky.social ) in Barcelona in July and talk about it.
Cool stuff! @frosas.bsky.social
arxiv.org/abs/2409.12029
Application deadline is October 15.
Come be our colleague.
Please RT!
apply.interfolio.com/193016
Application deadline is October 15.
Come be our colleague.
Please RT!
apply.interfolio.com/193016
🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖
How did this happen? Below are four alternative explanations of why, how, and what can we do about it 🧵
🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖
How did this happen? Below are four alternative explanations of why, how, and what can we do about it 🧵
Apply to our Physics of Data MSc programme at the U. of Padua (Galileo's university!) and choose our track in #ComplexSystems
To get a sense of who we are and what we do, watch👇:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ev_I...
Apply to our Physics of Data MSc programme at the U. of Padua (Galileo's university!) and choose our track in #ComplexSystems
To get a sense of who we are and what we do, watch👇:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ev_I...
@maxplanck.de @mps-cognition.bsky.social
More info & how to apply:
@maxplanck.de @mps-cognition.bsky.social
More info & how to apply:
“The separation principle: Where do beliefs and desires come from?”
A discussion of technical results that offer a formal ground to explain why agentic systems exhibit distinct properties that may be interpreted as “beliefs” and “desires”
www.lesswrong.com/posts/awMDNhoL6J97s6wFJ
“The separation principle: Where do beliefs and desires come from?”
A discussion of technical results that offer a formal ground to explain why agentic systems exhibit distinct properties that may be interpreted as “beliefs” and “desires”
www.lesswrong.com/posts/awMDNhoL6J97s6wFJ
rdcu.be/fCDGv
rdcu.be/fCDGv
Instead of arguing for a single valid interpretation, we propose a pluralistic view where rigorous alternatives coexist — each with affordances and limits
Finally published: “Four faces of information in natural systems”
🧵
Instead of arguing for a single valid interpretation, we propose a pluralistic view where rigorous alternatives coexist — each with affordances and limits
Finally published: “Four faces of information in natural systems”
🧵
Psychedelics don’t simply disorder the brain. We found hidden, context-sensitive organisation beneath the apparent chaos -- strongest in people reporting more positive, profound experiences and a reduced sense of separation from the world.
🧵👇
Psychedelics don’t simply disorder the brain. We found hidden, context-sensitive organisation beneath the apparent chaos -- strongest in people reporting more positive, profound experiences and a reduced sense of separation from the world.
🧵👇
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
What is real? I argue we should understand reality through resistance — how things push back against our grasp.
And smart contracts now give artifacts the kind of "outside" that once belonged only to nature. 🧵
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
What is real? I argue we should understand reality through resistance — how things push back against our grasp.
And smart contracts now give artifacts the kind of "outside" that once belonged only to nature. 🧵
People generate ("construe") simplified task representations on-the-fly. (Robots should too!) Also: awesome first paragraph.
PDF: arxiv.org/abs/2105.06948
People generate ("construe") simplified task representations on-the-fly. (Robots should too!) Also: awesome first paragraph.
PDF: arxiv.org/abs/2105.06948
“Loops all the way up: Recurrency as an implementation-first primitive for consciousness”
There are 200+ theories of consciousness, mostly talking past each other. Despite their differences, most give central stage to one key notion:
Recurrence
🧠 🔁
“Loops all the way up: Recurrency as an implementation-first primitive for consciousness”
There are 200+ theories of consciousness, mostly talking past each other. Despite their differences, most give central stage to one key notion:
Recurrence
🧠 🔁
“A Braitenberg vehicle’s habitat”, w/ @frosas.bsky.social and Filippo Torresan.
Accepted at ALIFE 2026.
What part of the environment constitutes an agent’s effective world, its habitat?
1/
“A Braitenberg vehicle’s habitat”, w/ @frosas.bsky.social and Filippo Torresan.
Accepted at ALIFE 2026.
What part of the environment constitutes an agent’s effective world, its habitat?
1/
This one is a doozy - in it we show that we can modulate the degree of emergent, multicellular organization in a Xenobot with an exogenous compound (ATP). 1/N
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
This one is a doozy - in it we show that we can modulate the degree of emergent, multicellular organization in a Xenobot with an exogenous compound (ATP). 1/N
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
Following last year’s success, @RL_Conference is back with a Journal-to-Conference track! Accepted TMLR papers within scope are invited to submit for consideration.
Please submit here: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
Following last year’s success, @RL_Conference is back with a Journal-to-Conference track! Accepted TMLR papers within scope are invited to submit for consideration.
Please submit here: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
Fascinating and profound book on what brains are *not* and what they might be. Including criticism of the computational and predictive brain frameworks.
You might not agree with some of it but quite thought provoking.
Fascinating and profound book on what brains are *not* and what they might be. Including criticism of the computational and predictive brain frameworks.
You might not agree with some of it but quite thought provoking.
Consciousness science is a fascinating but bewildering field: many competing theories, little consensus, and big open questions.
If you are looking for an accessible guide through this complex landscape, this book is for you.
Consciousness science is a fascinating but bewildering field: many competing theories, little consensus, and big open questions.
If you are looking for an accessible guide through this complex landscape, this book is for you.
There, I said it.
But John Heil argues it's little more than intellectual sleight of hand, mistaking gaps in our explanation for gaps in reality.
There, I said it.
TLDR: They are a form of meta-cognitive prediction errors i.e. they occur when we surprise ourselves about our own abilities! @rachitdubey.bsky.social
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
TLDR: They are a form of meta-cognitive prediction errors i.e. they occur when we surprise ourselves about our own abilities! @rachitdubey.bsky.social
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Spearheaded by Adam Barrett we tried to tackle some of the challenges of IIT.
We confront aspects worth delving into, with an incredible team of collaborators, inc. Pedro Mediano, @frosas.bsky.social, Daniel Bor, Lionel Barnett, and @anilseth.bsky.social.
Spearheaded by Adam Barrett we tried to tackle some of the challenges of IIT.
We confront aspects worth delving into, with an incredible team of collaborators, inc. Pedro Mediano, @frosas.bsky.social, Daniel Bor, Lionel Barnett, and @anilseth.bsky.social.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Led by @loopyluppi.bsky.social
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Led by @loopyluppi.bsky.social
www.ru.nl/en/working-a...
www.ru.nl/en/working-a...
For #BrainAwarenessWeek, excited to share our latest work about #Neuroscience of #Consciousness in @nathumbehav.nature.com
www.nature.com/articles/s41... 🧵👇
For #BrainAwarenessWeek, excited to share our latest work about #Neuroscience of #Consciousness in @nathumbehav.nature.com
www.nature.com/articles/s41... 🧵👇