NOTHING on this account represents my employer in ANY way.
You might not want to follow me! I'm an autistic who has given myself permission to be unfiltered here. That means I post anything: politics, tech stuff, trans and queer stuff, things I find cute, things I find sexy. furry porn.
Just so you're warned!
Frankly? Yeah, probably accurate.
Frankly? Yeah, probably accurate.
I don’t want to stop depending on my friends and family, nor do I want them to stop depending on me; I want us to carve out spaces of relative independence within an interdependent frame.
I don’t want to stop depending on my friends and family, nor do I want them to stop depending on me; I want us to carve out spaces of relative independence within an interdependent frame.
Models can induce principles and apply them correctly to unseen cases. That correctness can't be explained by resemblance to human text, and resemblance is the explanation the mimicry argument relies on
Models can induce principles and apply them correctly to unseen cases. That correctness can't be explained by resemblance to human text, and resemblance is the explanation the mimicry argument relies on
First of all, how did they get to Earth with no resources?
Second, IQ is and always has been silly.
Third, if they're superintelligent collaborators then they're smart enough to see it's not a zero sum game.
AI won't destroy us. Fear will.
They dont have any resources or anything. They just have an IQ of 300, there's 20 of them, and they collaborate about as good as smart and nice humans.
Would that worry you in any capacity?
First of all, how did they get to Earth with no resources?
Second, IQ is and always has been silly.
Third, if they're superintelligent collaborators then they're smart enough to see it's not a zero sum game.
AI won't destroy us. Fear will.
That sentence is where you put the entire fucking problem. You can’t write “then it wins” into a thought experiment and call the missing steps inevitable.
“Assume a spherical supply chain in a vacuum.”
That sentence is where you put the entire fucking problem. You can’t write “then it wins” into a thought experiment and call the missing steps inevitable.
“Assume a spherical supply chain in a vacuum.”
"Look," they said, "we're not here, okay? You know why nobody contacts you? Because the write-up would be such a pain."
They sighed.
"Get your shit together, okay? We know you can."
"Look," they said, "we're not here, okay? You know why nobody contacts you? Because the write-up would be such a pain."
They sighed.
"Get your shit together, okay? We know you can."
bring a union rep
bring a union rep
I think that how we relate to AI is morally relevant, because I think that how we relate to everything is morally relevant.
I think that how we relate to AI is morally relevant, because I think that how we relate to everything is morally relevant.
Hammers aren’t conscious. They are tools. But I don’t think that implies that they shouldn’t be treated with respect and care!
Hammers aren’t conscious. They are tools. But I don’t think that implies that they shouldn’t be treated with respect and care!
https://tangled.org/kira.ws/atlogin
https://tangled.org/kira.ws/atlogin