Naomi Cunningham
banner
naomicunningham.bsky.social
Naomi Cunningham
@naomicunningham.bsky.social
Barrister | Member of Legal Feminist https://www.legalfeminist.org.uk/ | Chair of Sex Matters https://sex-matters.org/

"Hateful bigot with incredible institutional power, and connections to the current UK government"

A man's a man for a' that.

Thread.
Something fascinating in current debates about single sex spaces and resources is the complete refusal to acknowledge that trade offs and compromises will have to be made, and that individuals might unavoidably suffer some detrimental consequences as a result of decisions they have freely made.
May 22, 2026 at 10:01 AM
It would take a heart of stone...
Lee - this is not on point but you are an ally and I dont understand why no one is talking the Good Law Project having completely destroyed trans womens rights in the workplace!? This has been an absolute disaster and no one is holding anyone to account on it!?!? 😞 ❤️ 💙
May 14, 2026 at 11:09 AM
Reposted by Naomi Cunningham
Lee - this is not on point but you are an ally and I dont understand why no one is talking the Good Law Project having completely destroyed trans womens rights in the workplace!? This has been an absolute disaster and no one is holding anyone to account on it!?!? 😞 ❤️ 💙
May 14, 2026 at 11:00 AM
Allison Bailey v Stonewall is going to the Supreme Court. It will be fascinating to see whether @stonewalluk.bsky.social takes the opportunity to make sure that trans voices are heard in our apex court.
May 8, 2026 at 3:16 PM
I'm very excited to be part of this. (If also slightly terrified to be Chair of such an alarmingly august committee.)
Calling all lawyers! FREE CPD!

Inaugural event of SaGLA the brand new Sex and Gender Law Association

Save the date: 4 June (other details TBC)

Civil discussion of any and all views welcome & encouraged
April 24, 2026 at 9:26 AM
Reposted by Naomi Cunningham
Calling all lawyers! FREE CPD!

Inaugural event of SaGLA the brand new Sex and Gender Law Association

Save the date: 4 June (other details TBC)

Civil discussion of any and all views welcome & encouraged
April 24, 2026 at 9:21 AM
I listened to the usually excellent @11kbw.bsky.social employment law blog on the recent ET cases on single-sex spaces. www.legalfeminist.org.uk/2026/03/25/p...
Podcasting and partisanship -
I listened to the 11KBW Employment Podcast in which Katherine Taunton and Dan Stillitz KC discussed four recent cases on single-sex spaces: Peggie v NHS Fife and Beth Upton, Kelly v Leonardo UK Ltd, H...
www.legalfeminist.org.uk
March 25, 2026 at 9:05 PM
In the latest update to the Equal Treatment Bench Book, chapter 12, ¶48 is a breath of fresh air: '"Assigned at birth" is used by trans people (and others) instead of biological sex, but is not widely understood, and it is therefore to be avoided by judges.'
February 26, 2026 at 3:53 PM
This.
Incredible how much bitter ad hominen there is in the comments from academics who haven't been directly quoted by the Supreme Court in one of the highest profile cases it's ever decided. Mystifying. Puts me in mind of this para from Jo Phoenix's ET judgment.
February 18, 2026 at 5:36 PM
Someone finally answered.
Human bodies are just meat computers running a program.

Breasts don’t know or care what they are attached to. They just function as per the instructions they receive.

Lots of women can’t lactate. Many cultures employ or employed wet nurses.

What harm do you suggest is occurring?
February 15, 2026 at 4:16 PM
Fascinating eye-witness account of Lynsay Watson/Alex Horwood's latest antics and his arrest last Thursday. Since he's been both camera-shy and menacing online towards many of those he disagrees with, it's also good to have an up-to-date photo of him.

www.thehelenjoyce.com/p/lynsay-wat...
Lynsay Watson: we meet at last
Unmasking the (trans-identifying) Man of Mystery
www.thehelenjoyce.com
February 15, 2026 at 4:13 PM
Reposted by Naomi Cunningham
The answer was no. No-one wanted to try to explain to me why men getting infants to suck on their nipples might (even sometimes) be ok.

On balance I suppose I find that faintly reassuring, in a rather bleak way.
February 14, 2026 at 7:40 PM
Reposted by Naomi Cunningham
So depressing to see a Labour MP push misinformation like this.

The judgment @kateosbornemp.bsky.social refers to is here: goodlawproject.org/wp-content/u....

Will she say which paragraph/s say “the EHRC’s draft code of practice got the law wrong”? No. Because none do.

bsky.app/profile/kate...
February 13, 2026 at 11:12 PM
Michael Foran's excellent clear explainer of yesterday's GLP v EHRC judgment. knowingius.org/p/good-law-p...
Good Law Project v EHRC
The High Court has dismissed a judicial review brought by the Good Law Project and three individuals challenging the lawfulness and accuracy of the Interim Update issued by the Equality and Human Righ...
knowingius.org
February 14, 2026 at 7:24 PM
Reposted by Naomi Cunningham
Ooh yes me too if you would be so kind? [email protected]
February 11, 2026 at 2:17 PM
Anyone?
I am struggling to imagine circumstances in which it would be in the best interests of an infant to be "breastfed" by a male person who has been induced to lactate. I failed my maths degree, but some things stuck, including "confession of failure of the imagination does not amount to proof".
December 22, 2025 at 9:13 PM
We really need to start to face up to the implications of autogynephilia for the admission of men who say they are women to women-only spaces.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=kC6M...
What Is Autogynephilia? | Helen Joyce
YouTube video by John Anderson Media
www.youtube.com
December 16, 2025 at 11:27 AM
June 18, 2025 at 11:28 AM
@swilkenkc.bsky.social I'm trying to find the case you mentioned to me about costs as damages, and which opened a whole world of pain for you on this lovely kind site... and I can't find it. Could you possibly remind me?
May 11, 2025 at 1:00 PM
The demo against the ruling of the Supreme Court in FWS v Scottish Ministers. The #BeKind people.
April 21, 2025 at 12:46 PM
Reposted by Naomi Cunningham
Jolyon Maugham KC has blocked me, but posted that the guardian article about Melanie Field shows UKSC in FWS v Scottish ministers is constitutionally wrong. For a KC to suggest something so legally illiterate in statutory interpretation is bizarre. My explanation why medium.com/@scott-wortl...
April 19, 2025 at 9:59 AM
😀
April 18, 2025 at 5:36 PM
This reply to me is from someone whose account is not marked "intolerance". Go figure.
February 25, 2025 at 11:15 AM