NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
banner
originalist.bsky.social
NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
@originalist.bsky.social
"Every day I have to marvel at what the billionaires and Fox News pulled off. They got working whites to hate the very people that want them to have more pay, clean air, water, free healthcare and the power to fight back against big banks & big corps."
Pinned
NYT editors (and nepo baby owner) put "Claudine Gay" in "top 5 featured on the New York Times homepage Dec 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 22, 25"

While they put Trump calling for Constitution's "termination" on page 15 and chief of staff "tyrant" warning on 12

Chris Rufo openly bragged about it:
Chris Rufo "a total product of right-wing affirmative action and you literally would never have heard of him if he was a liberal"
bsky.app/profile/chri...

NYT front page coverage all the time!

By powerful, mediocre editors who push "meritocracy" narrative yet hired each other with legacy privilege
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
Democratic strategists: Ahhh! What's the right message!!?? Where do we moderate!?!?

Jon Ossoff: This administration is horrible. I hate these people. We should put them in jail. I'm pissed

Voters: This guy is cool

Strategists: I can't figure it out!!!!!
September 18, 2026 at 3:45 AM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
"inconvenient truths:
easier for well-paid strategists and pundits to advise stop saying Latinx (a non-issue)"

"that every single leftist online is responsible for message discipline and not being annoying, while no Republican is ever responsible for their words or deeds"

bsky.app/profile/mbkp...
under-appreciated dynamic is elite pundits "flat out just find the left interpersonally irritating in a way they do not find the right

a lot of the talk of a vibe shift was wish-casting their irritants away.

willing to acquiesce to democracy's being dismantled as a result

bsky.app/profile/last...
"This is also part of the school of thought that every single leftist online is responsible for message discipline and not being annoying, while no Republican is ever responsible for their words or deeds

It’s deeply insane"

bsky.app/profile/poor...
September 18, 2026 at 4:50 AM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
The key to getting low-information voters to vote for Democrats or just to sit out elections is to do everything possible to brand Republicans and especially Trump as stupid losers that are embarrassing to associate with. Make them the NY Jets fans of politics.
I almost spat out my soda laughing at this. Like rats deserting the sinking MAGA ship.
September 17, 2026 at 10:34 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
"Weird" was OK, but I really wish someone would call Republican voters what they are: Suckers. These are dumb rubes who fall for the wallet inspector routine over and over again. They spend their last pennies on magic beans because are in the constant thrall of some grifter. Be meaner to them.
This is why “weird” was working in the first part of the 2024 campaign and I was dumbfounded when they made Walz stop.
September 17, 2026 at 10:44 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
Same people who seem to think it’s bad for China to beat us at AI are perfectly fine with China beating us at high speed rail, solar energy, wind energy, shall we go on
'oh so you want china to beat us' bro what the hell do i care leave me to the humble life i am trying to build for myself
i dont understand what winning ai means and why i should be scared of not winning ai
September 17, 2026 at 7:29 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
feels kind of wild that the default great future achievement of LLMs is "someday if could cure cancer" when mRNA vaccines are in fact making progress on potentially curing or preventing certain cancers, very "we have curing cancer at home"
September 17, 2026 at 8:02 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
has machine learning been involved in some of that new vaccine research? probably! but if LLMs were part of it I feel like we'd be hearing about it nonstop idk
September 17, 2026 at 8:03 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
And lost progress:

"Scientists making huge breakthroughs using mRNA vaccines to treat melanoma, pancreatic cancer, and other cancers.

Meanwhile, RFK Jr has cancelled $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine research.

“Make America Healthy Again”
bsky.app/profile/luck...

bsky.app/profile/mims...
September 17, 2026 at 8:47 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
Every prison and jail calls it segregation. No one says “solitary confinement” bc that would violate international law.
"ICE doesn't really call solitary confinement 'segregation.' No way they use that word."

"It's true."
The unending mission to describe the US migration enforcement regime to less-engaged friends and family...
a) without sounding like a crank;
b) while not overwhelming anyone to the point where they feel paralyzed.
September 17, 2026 at 6:08 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
The “alligator Alcatraz” cages are the same ones they used for therapy in Pelican bay and the mental health ward. I’ve been in them.
September 17, 2026 at 6:12 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
And they still have their thumbs on the scales. Questions like "should prayer be allowed in public schools?" and "should the government promote traditional gender roles?" do not accurately reflect the actual policies in dispute, they're both sanewashing to make GOP policies look less malicious.
notice how these people who were formerly all-in on the mythical power of ideological moderation have changed their tack and entire organizational orientation after discovering the wisdom of the ancients that most voters are not ideological at all. now it’s all about “heterodoxy.”
September 17, 2026 at 5:51 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
notice how these people who were formerly all-in on the mythical power of ideological moderation have changed their tack and entire organizational orientation after discovering the wisdom of the ancients that most voters are not ideological at all. now it’s all about “heterodoxy.”
September 17, 2026 at 5:16 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
"Fetterman staffers adding “Institute” to name to be taken more seriously than deserve

Searchlight essentially a blog of Yglesias quality that takes in money from donors and produces news stories about why left is wrong and Democrats must embrace moderation

entire industry in Washington
What a job
Most people are not policy experts. Therefore it's easy to produce a poll that finds that most people do not advocate for any particular sophisticated policy position. Centrists use this as a weapon against progress, which is bad.

www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/what-polls...
What Polls Do and Don't Tell You
Does the public oppose its own interests? Really?
www.hamiltonnolan.com
September 17, 2026 at 6:38 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
the degree of both autonomy and corruption inside tiny police departments in the U.S. is ridiculous.
September 15, 2026 at 6:41 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
My brother-in-law, a policeman in England, went to the US as part of some kind of policing exchange programme. He came back utterly appalled by US cop culture and no longer considers them police at all. And he went out there in total fanboy mode.
September 15, 2026 at 7:02 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
WNBA somehow fucked up alllll that good will and enthusiasm they built up over the last few years of putting an OUTSTANDING product on the floor with real stars only to hand the reins over to a transphobic loser who RIDES THE BENCH
September 15, 2026 at 7:08 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
every year this person tells some made up story about how DEI/affirmative action/international students ”stole” a college space from her children or their friends or whoever
September 15, 2026 at 6:26 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
"white applicants were 300% more likely to be admitted than Asian with exact same academic record"

"Ivy League schools admit more legacy than black students"

"Who benefits from discriminatory admissions? White males"

"more qualified applications from women
higher grades and 70% of valedictorians"
September 15, 2026 at 7:09 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
Douthat's hire is pretty emblematic of the problem - Bari and company are convinced that what most of this country wants is Douthat-coded news, and the actual audience for that stuff is her and fifty other people who come to her parties
September 15, 2026 at 3:52 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
anti-anti-Trump is roughly 300 people, total, and every single one of them has a newspaper column or a substack
September 15, 2026 at 3:56 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
love this for bari, and most of all for douthat, who left the cushiest, most intellectually vacant job in journalism for one where he'll get shitcanned inside of six months
September 15, 2026 at 3:57 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
please, bari, convince ezra klein and yglesias to join your show and ruin their careers, our weary nation demands it
September 15, 2026 at 3:58 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
These people believe that individual choice, powered by the invisible hand of the free market, will naturally reveal what is good and what is bad, except when it comes to their own beliefs. Then they're gonna force you to sit there and listen.
Can't believe "I hate you. You're the dumbest generation. You don't deserve jobs." hasn't been a winning sales pitch.
September 15, 2026 at 4:41 PM
Reposted by NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo
"amused by how conservative world is governed by the kind of “affirmative action” they say happens in mainstream institutions

totally unqualified dipshits are handed the keys to institutions because they say the right thing and have the right look"
bsky.app/profile/jame...

White men "meritocracy":
September 15, 2026 at 5:20 PM