sbtaffy.bsky.social
@sbtaffy.bsky.social
Reposted
"Lads, the women are saying “NO”…
That’s your cue to sod off.
It’s really simple.
What kind of socialist protests against women organising collectively within their own political party?"
posted by Jonathan Hinder Labour MP for Clitheroe and Pendle.
Thanks Mr Hinder, women need this kind of support
September 24, 2026 at 9:06 PM
Reposted
Oh dear. Not great for women then.
September 12, 2026 at 9:50 AM
Reposted
It’s some psychological trick that has enabled the sex class that inflicts the majority of sexual violence, to self-identify into the sex class that is the overwhelming victim of that sexual violence. And anyone with concerns is not only vilified, but accused of hatred, bigotry and even genocide.
September 11, 2026 at 7:35 PM
Reposted
Sex definition: Science is not a political prop
Scientists Chris Pook and Julia Schaletzky challenge an article contributed to Newsroom that they believe moved a political position into a scientific conclusion

newsroom.co.nz/2026/08/26/s...
Sex definition: Science is not a political prop
Scientists Chris Pook and Julia Schaletzky challenge an article contributed to Newsroom that they believe moved a political position into a scientific conclusion
newsroom.co.nz
August 26, 2026 at 12:10 AM
Reposted
We weren't sure to post this or not. Another Republican going on about 'trans' fits in nicely with the trans ideologues shtick that it's all a right-wing conspiracy. After a little research, found out - HE'S A DEMOCRAT! buff.ly/xzQg26P
https://x.com/jonahowheeler/status/2090052039216665031
x.com
August 19, 2026 at 6:16 PM
Reposted
This is the tragedy. I suspect that very few gender critical people want to see trans identified people being subjected to prejudice, discrimination or abuse. We want them to be respected and supported. But sex is real, it cannot change, and sometimes it really matters.
August 10, 2026 at 6:17 PM
Reposted
A perceptive and challenging article - thanks, Paul heartlandstribune.com/trans-rights...
August 7, 2026 at 3:22 PM
Reposted
Those who have recently returned from a 3- or 7-day ban for using sex-based words may choose not to repost this post as you’ll be racking up your points-make-a-permanent-ban prize (it’s 16). And of course those who‘be been permanently banned (Cyndicate) can’t repost at all.
bsky.app/profile/call...
Here is Magdalen Burns talking in 2018 about how, unless we act, we will be unable to use reality-based languages, lose right to free speech, not be able to gather as lesbians. Her video was in response to Dennis, one of the men in this case against Kirralie Smith.

youtu.be/dE_-96DiX54?...
July 25, 2026 at 1:21 PM
Reposted
NHS trust apology after agreement with nurses in Darlington trans changing room row
NHS trust apology after agreement with nurses in Darlington trans changing room row
An NHS trust has formally concluded a long-running employment tribunal case involving nurses who raised concerns about a transgender colleague.
www.bntmedia.uk
June 24, 2026 at 11:52 AM
Reposted
I very much hope @iandunt.bsky.social reads @akuareindorfkc.bsky.social 's forensic analysis of the multiple and serious legal errors in his recent Substack on the EHRC's Code of Practice.

withinthelaw.substack.com/p/the-ehrc-c...
"THE EHRC CODE EXPLAINED": A RESPONSE TO IAN DUNT | Part 1
This article is a personal opinion piece and does not constitute legal advice.
withinthelaw.substack.com
June 20, 2026 at 9:16 PM
Reposted
Thankfully @akuareindorfkc.bsky.social is on the case with the legal ‘analysis’ of FWS and the Code of Practice published by Ian Dunt. It makes some very bad mistakes about the law, including this one. And its failure to acknowledge women have rights under the Equality Act & ECHR too (oops!)
June 18, 2026 at 5:08 PM
Reposted
Segregating men from women, when appropriate, is nothing like Jim Crow.
June 16, 2026 at 5:51 AM
Reposted
Women are not a subset of their own sex. And a politics too frightened to say what a woman is, has already told you, clearly enough, whose side it is on.

You cannot protect what you cannot define.

And a left that refuses to define women has no business claiming to defend them.
June 5, 2026 at 4:38 AM
Reposted
🖕🖕🖕from a piece by Paul Knagg of Labour Heartlands. Give his blog a read.
June 3, 2026 at 4:15 PM
Reposted
"The toilet is not the argument.
It has been chosen w great care, because it achieves 3 things... It makes women’s objections see mean, petty... It reduces a legal settlement abt women’s fundamental rights to a sin intimate, emotionally charged doorway & it places women permanently on the defensive
June 3, 2026 at 4:11 PM
Reposted
Lots of interesting information in this article about how TRAs in the Labour Party and civil service are sabotaging attempts to get the updated EHRC guidance published
Gender ideologues run rings round Bridget Phillipson

www.thetimes.com/article/b378...
Gender ideologues run rings round Bridget Phillipson
Equalities minister has still to present statutory guidance on single-sex spaces. Maybe she hopes for a reshuffle rescue
www.thetimes.com
April 18, 2026 at 2:06 PM
x.com
April 15, 2026 at 11:35 AM
Reposted
Semenya will lose.
Because female athletes have human rights too.
As the IOC has now realised.
The equal human rights of female people depend on the recognition that 51% of the global population are human beings with female bodies.
In sport that necessitates dedicated female categories.
April 2, 2026 at 7:45 AM
I wish all my followers a good night. I wish all my detractors a good night too xx
March 30, 2026 at 12:24 AM