Holger Hestermeyer
banner
hhesterm.bsky.social
Holger Hestermeyer
@hhesterm.bsky.social

Professor of Int’l & EU Law, Diplomatic Academy Vienna. Past: Prof., founding Director CIGAD at King's College London, specialist adviser House of Lords EU Select Committee, Référendaire CJEU

Political science 58%
Business 20%
Pinned
The Diplomatische Akademie put the video of my inaugural lecture on "International Law without Law" on youtube. If you are interested - it is available here youtu.be/IGtHFolFinM?...
International Law Without Law
YouTube video by Diplomatische Akademie Wien
youtu.be

Also difficult to do in coalition situations, as personalities are part of the package.

Ich wünschte ich könnte Ihre Leidenschaft momentan teilen.

The President of Austria illustrating the difficulties Austria will have to deal with as a member of the UNSC. Challenging is an understatement.
In my meeting with the Crown Prince of Kuwait, Sheikh Sabah Khaled Al-Hamad Al-Sabah, we spoke about the US-Iran war, the closure of the Strait of Hormus and its dramatic consequences on the global economy. 1️⃣

The use of national security in the US is reminiscent of Notverordnungen under Art. 48 of the Weimar Constitution. As long as SCOTUS leaves the factual determination of whether there is a national security situation to Potus, there's little hope things will improve.
Yep. It's one of the ways that SCOTUS has not only failed to apply the law to Trump but has also *made him worse* by shuttling him towards worse behavior. He inferred--correctly--that the law wasn't even relevant to whether SCOTUS would act.
supreme court: if you say the magic words national security then the president gets to do it
trump (pointing at immigration): national security
scotus: sure why not
trump (pointing at ballroom): national security
scotus: hmm plausibly
trump (pointing at arch): national security
scotus: [tbd 2027]

Reposted by Holger Hestermeyer

In my meeting with the Crown Prince of Kuwait, Sheikh Sabah Khaled Al-Hamad Al-Sabah, we spoke about the US-Iran war, the closure of the Strait of Hormus and its dramatic consequences on the global economy. 1️⃣

Reposted by Holger Hestermeyer

Yep. It's one of the ways that SCOTUS has not only failed to apply the law to Trump but has also *made him worse* by shuttling him towards worse behavior. He inferred--correctly--that the law wasn't even relevant to whether SCOTUS would act.
supreme court: if you say the magic words national security then the president gets to do it
trump (pointing at immigration): national security
scotus: sure why not
trump (pointing at ballroom): national security
scotus: hmm plausibly
trump (pointing at arch): national security
scotus: [tbd 2027]

Absolutely - I think one of the nightmares for the EU to navigate is that they do want a close relationship, would want to cooperate with people like Burnham, but continue to see stances made around ripping up everything. Treacherous waters.

I agree - particularly in the mostly intergovernmental branches. And an exemption from /inclusion in make Europe policies (?)

Kenneth describes what associate membership might mean…

On the margins yes, for varying reasons. Eg conformity assessment: a limited risk CAN organisations will achieve a similar role as U.K. ones, risking eu loss of control over checking its own rules /2

My guess: on the basics, no. A lot of these are dictated by how the eu works. Eg free movement of goods requires rule alignment and an institutional backbone. /1

I don‘t think that’s correct. The 90/180 rule applies to Canada BUT Canada has agreements with some member states that seem to be grandfathered and provide for different provisions (and that the U.K. didn‚t have).

Reposted by Holger Hestermeyer

Reposted by Holger Hestermeyer

Is there a willingness in EU to become more inventive for Canada than for the UK?
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/carn...
Carney, Canada and the EU: What could it mean for the UK/EU reset? | Institute for Government
Fresh EU thinking on Canada may not give the UK more post-Brexit options.
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk

I actually think this is true: underpaid journalists that have to create clicks end up having to constantly exaggerate drama to earn a living.

The only somewhat surprising thing is that he hates migrants. Sir, your own football squad are more than 50% migrants. And yes, of course, you don’t mean those. But by far far far most migrants are legal and working.
How is this news? billionaire oil person says uk needs to drill more and tax less, though, of course, he‘s actually in Monaco. And he would do more in the uk if the state subsidised him more. Dear BBC, that‘s like me saying the uk‘s problem is underpaid law profs. www.bbc.com/news/article...
Billionaire Manchester United owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe says he has lost confidence in UK
Ineos founder Sir Jim Ratcliffe tells the BBC he thinks the country is "on the slide" and calls for more investment in the North Sea.
www.bbc.com

And... isn‘t he right?

One of the most annoying things about populism is that pointing out contradictions doesn‘t do a thing to change anyone‘s mind on anything
Can’t wait for Marco Rubio or Vance to scold Europe over free speech again
BREAKING: President Trump says he is banning CNN, MSNOW and Politico from the White House over their coverage.

Reposted by Holger Hestermeyer

Can’t wait for Marco Rubio or Vance to scold Europe over free speech again

Reposted by Holger Hestermeyer

No notes.

Report of factfinding mission of ohchr on human rights in Iran, including US attacks www.ohchr.org/sites/defaul...
www.ohchr.org