https://www.agoracitizen.network
📊 500+ participants
✍️ 770+ statements contributed
🗳️ 7,000 votes cast
Every statement is dynamically translated across Kyrgyz, Russian, and English, so participants deliberate together — each in their own language.
📊 500+ participants
✍️ 770+ statements contributed
🗳️ 7,000 votes cast
Every statement is dynamically translated across Kyrgyz, Russian, and English, so participants deliberate together — each in their own language.
www.agoracitizen.app/conversation...
C'est ce que permet @agoracitizen.network, contrairement aux plateformes mainstreams.
www.agoracitizen.app/conversation...
C'est ce que permet @agoracitizen.network, contrairement aux plateformes mainstreams.
Ce qui commence par des algorithmes qui rapprochent les citoyens au lieu de les fragmenter. @tournesol.app et @agoracitizen.network
La conversation avec Shaïman 👇 www.youtube.com/live/zqWdq8b...
Ce qui commence par des algorithmes qui rapprochent les citoyens au lieu de les fragmenter. @tournesol.app et @agoracitizen.network
La conversation avec Shaïman 👇 www.youtube.com/live/zqWdq8b...
→ Does "Approved / Rejected" feel clearer than "Common Ground"?
→ Is there a better framing?
→ What would make this page more actionable?
Let us know 👇
→ Does "Approved / Rejected" feel clearer than "Common Ground"?
→ Is there a better framing?
→ What would make this page more actionable?
Let us know 👇
Agora isn't just used by its community — it's shaped by it.
(One of you even spotted the redesign before we announced it 👀)
Agora isn't just used by its community — it's shaped by it.
(One of you even spotted the redesign before we announced it 👀)
But presenting agreement and disagreement side-by-side in a way that's intuitive (not confusing or overly technical) has been a real design challenge.
But presenting agreement and disagreement side-by-side in a way that's intuitive (not confusing or overly technical) has been a real design challenge.
There isn’t an equally visible way to see what participants broadly disagree with.
We think that matters.
There isn’t an equally visible way to see what participants broadly disagree with.
We think that matters.