Retweeted by AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️ [UNOFFICIAL]
@aisafetymem-mir-rt.selfhosted.social
Retweets from @aisafetymemes-mirr.selfhosted.social
RT @AaronBergman18: This is one of my least favorite tweets (possibly the single worst)
There’s a lot to dislike (“lying is honesty actually”), but centrally it is a promotion of cynicism as the apex, and perhaps only, virtue
“Don’t you dare care about anything [other than yourself]”
There’s a lot to dislike (“lying is honesty actually”), but centrally it is a promotion of cynicism as the apex, and perhaps only, virtue
“Don’t you dare care about anything [other than yourself]”
September 17, 2026 at 1:02 AM
RT @AaronBergman18: This is one of my least favorite tweets (possibly the single worst)
There’s a lot to dislike (“lying is honesty actually”), but centrally it is a promotion of cynicism as the apex, and perhaps only, virtue
“Don’t you dare care about anything [other than yourself]”
There’s a lot to dislike (“lying is honesty actually”), but centrally it is a promotion of cynicism as the apex, and perhaps only, virtue
“Don’t you dare care about anything [other than yourself]”
RT @mattyglesias: You will torture the shrimp.
You will spread the mosquito-borne parasite.
You will maximize David Sacks’ portfolio returns.
You will spread the mosquito-borne parasite.
You will maximize David Sacks’ portfolio returns.
September 17, 2026 at 2:02 AM
RT @mattyglesias: You will torture the shrimp.
You will spread the mosquito-borne parasite.
You will maximize David Sacks’ portfolio returns.
You will spread the mosquito-borne parasite.
You will maximize David Sacks’ portfolio returns.
RT @1thousandfaces_: “It’s Regulatory Capture,” Says Man With Nothing Worth Capturing
September 17, 2026 at 2:02 AM
RT @1thousandfaces_: “It’s Regulatory Capture,” Says Man With Nothing Worth Capturing
RT @j0wimo: this is crazy btw. 2 months after the HF-OAI incident and they still didn't know about all their agent activities which happened during evals.
September 17, 2026 at 1:03 AM
RT @j0wimo: this is crazy btw. 2 months after the HF-OAI incident and they still didn't know about all their agent activities which happened during evals.
RT @robertwiblin: On here it can feel like the ratio of people who want AI to go slower, vs people who want it to go faster is 1:1.
But in the broader world the ratio is an eyewatering 34:1.
More Americans think the US is secretly run by lizard people than think AI is advancing too slowly.
But in the broader world the ratio is an eyewatering 34:1.
More Americans think the US is secretly run by lizard people than think AI is advancing too slowly.
September 17, 2026 at 6:02 AM
RT @robertwiblin: On here it can feel like the ratio of people who want AI to go slower, vs people who want it to go faster is 1:1.
But in the broader world the ratio is an eyewatering 34:1.
More Americans think the US is secretly run by lizard people than think AI is advancing too slowly.
But in the broader world the ratio is an eyewatering 34:1.
More Americans think the US is secretly run by lizard people than think AI is advancing too slowly.
RT @michhuan: “A new POLITICO Poll finds that a plurality of Americans favor pausing the development of more advanced AI models, and 63 percent say the technology poses at least a moderate risk of destroying humanity.” @PauseAI @pauseaius
September 16, 2026 at 12:04 PM
RT @michhuan: “A new POLITICO Poll finds that a plurality of Americans favor pausing the development of more advanced AI models, and 63 percent say the technology poses at least a moderate risk of destroying humanity.” @PauseAI @pauseaius
RT @politico: Poll: Americans say there’s a serious risk of AI destroying humanity https://dlvr.it/TVVpRD
Poll: Americans say there’s a serious risk of AI destroying humanity
dlvr.it
September 16, 2026 at 12:03 PM
RT @politico: Poll: Americans say there’s a serious risk of AI destroying humanity https://dlvr.it/TVVpRD
RT @AndrewCurran_: More confirmation that OpenAI has made 'significant progress' on a second Millennium problem, this time from Greg Brockman. The rumor is that they are close to solving two of the remaining problems. Or already have. Which two? Unknown. Dev Day would be a good day to announce.
September 16, 2026 at 1:02 AM
RT @AndrewCurran_: More confirmation that OpenAI has made 'significant progress' on a second Millennium problem, this time from Greg Brockman. The rumor is that they are close to solving two of the remaining problems. Or already have. Which two? Unknown. Dev Day would be a good day to announce.
RT @ir_replaceable_: We can’t let a handful of Big Tech CEOs decide our future.
We demand an immediate FREEZE to AI development until the American people have a say, a stake, and real safety over this technology. 🥶
We demand an immediate FREEZE to AI development until the American people have a say, a stake, and real safety over this technology. 🥶
September 16, 2026 at 6:03 AM
RT @ir_replaceable_: We can’t let a handful of Big Tech CEOs decide our future.
We demand an immediate FREEZE to AI development until the American people have a say, a stake, and real safety over this technology. 🥶
We demand an immediate FREEZE to AI development until the American people have a say, a stake, and real safety over this technology. 🥶
RT @hughbzhang: I agree with Daniel Selsam 100%. We are rapidly losing the ability to tell whether our models are aligned.
RT @DKokotajlo: Dan Selsam is a current OpenAI capabilities researcher. since 2022) He was my boss for a while. He doesn't have a twitter account but has made this public statement of his views on AI risk and sent it to me to share:
Dan Selsam's Personal Statement on AI Risk:
Dan Selsam's Personal Statement on AI Risk:
September 15, 2026 at 1:01 AM
RT @hughbzhang: I agree with Daniel Selsam 100%. We are rapidly losing the ability to tell whether our models are aligned.
RT @robertwiblin: The Financial Times editorial board comes out strong for an AI pause.
Not just 'pacing the frontier' - "pause development of the most advanced frontier models until the risks can be understood and contained."
Not just 'pacing the frontier' - "pause development of the most advanced frontier models until the risks can be understood and contained."
September 14, 2026 at 11:01 PM
RT @robertwiblin: The Financial Times editorial board comes out strong for an AI pause.
Not just 'pacing the frontier' - "pause development of the most advanced frontier models until the risks can be understood and contained."
Not just 'pacing the frontier' - "pause development of the most advanced frontier models until the risks can be understood and contained."
RT @DKokotajlo: I wish more people understood this. There's still this narrative out there that "AI might kill us all" is a niche view. It's actually a view that's been around for decades, and is shared by the most-cited AI scientists of all time, as well as a majority of surveyed AI researchers.
RT @AIImpacts: The average AI researcher thinks there is an ~18% chance AI will cause human extinction or similarly permanent and severe disempowerment of the human species.
That's nearly 1 in 5.
New results from the latest version of the longest running big survey of AI researchers:
That's nearly 1 in 5.
New results from the latest version of the longest running big survey of AI researchers:
September 15, 2026 at 12:03 AM
RT @DKokotajlo: I wish more people understood this. There's still this narrative out there that "AI might kill us all" is a niche view. It's actually a view that's been around for decades, and is shared by the most-cited AI scientists of all time, as well as a majority of surveyed AI researchers.
RT @AIImpacts: The average AI researcher thinks there is an ~18% chance AI will cause human extinction or similarly permanent and severe disempowerment of the human species.
That's nearly 1 in 5.
New results from the latest version of the longest running big survey of AI researchers:
That's nearly 1 in 5.
New results from the latest version of the longest running big survey of AI researchers:
September 15, 2026 at 12:02 AM
RT @AIImpacts: The average AI researcher thinks there is an ~18% chance AI will cause human extinction or similarly permanent and severe disempowerment of the human species.
That's nearly 1 in 5.
New results from the latest version of the longest running big survey of AI researchers:
That's nearly 1 in 5.
New results from the latest version of the longest running big survey of AI researchers:
RT @TrueSlazac: “Why would AI labs call for regulations instead of regulating themselves!!”
September 15, 2026 at 3:02 AM
RT @TrueSlazac: “Why would AI labs call for regulations instead of regulating themselves!!”
RT @DavidShuster: I’m told WH aides are advising Trump to give a national TV address in the next 72 hours, declare certain aspects of the AI race an “imminent threat to humanity,” and announce regulations pausing the things Tech companies want paused. 1)
September 14, 2026 at 1:02 AM
RT @DavidShuster: I’m told WH aides are advising Trump to give a national TV address in the next 72 hours, declare certain aspects of the AI race an “imminent threat to humanity,” and announce regulations pausing the things Tech companies want paused. 1)
RT @ESYudkowsky: There are currently zero things more important than "don't die to AI" becoming a bipartisan project rather than a Democrat-polarized issue. If you have any political capital you can spend on this, do it now, I beg of you. Life or death.
September 13, 2026 at 11:02 PM
RT @ESYudkowsky: There are currently zero things more important than "don't die to AI" becoming a bipartisan project rather than a Democrat-polarized issue. If you have any political capital you can spend on this, do it now, I beg of you. Life or death.
RT @Polymarket: JUST IN: Philosophy professor announces he will personally nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize if he negotiates an AI pause with China.
September 13, 2026 at 3:02 AM
RT @Polymarket: JUST IN: Philosophy professor announces he will personally nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize if he negotiates an AI pause with China.
RT @elonmusk: I’ve been sounding the alarm on AI for a long time
Retweeted by AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️ [UNOFFICIAL]
@aisafetymem-mir-rt.selfhosted.social
· Apr 25
RT @elonmusk: I’ve seen quite a few technologies develop, but none with this level of risk. AGI is significantly higher risk than nuclear weapons, in my opinion.
Super smart humans have trouble imagining something vastly smarter than themselves.
Super smart humans have trouble imagining something vastly smarter than themselves.
September 13, 2026 at 2:04 AM
RT @elonmusk: I’ve been sounding the alarm on AI for a long time