4/4. Started in crypto because the data is unusually clean there. the framework extends to finance commentators, political pundits, journalists, and anywhere people make public claims that can be checked later.

solo, no revenue, out of pocket. methodology: athenaindex.com/methodology

3/4. The sixth one is whether their checkable claims actually hold up - and that part is only about a fifth of the score. the other 80% is about how someone makes a claim, not whether the claim hit. that's the part most "track records" miss.

2/4. The score looks at six things: how specific someone is when they make a claim, how often their confidence matches reality, whether they're consistent or flip-flop, what they disclose about conflicts of interest, and whether they own up when they're wrong.