BrainChip
banner
brainchip.bsky.social
BrainChip
@brainchip.bsky.social
Australian Researcher in Microfluidics, Neuroscience, and Health.
Very interesting!
June 13, 2026 at 2:26 PM
80% of co-authors don't even read the manuscript. We shouldn't be surprised if people don't check references.
May 16, 2026 at 6:17 PM
"The EduQit quantum computer comes with five qubits, which makes it less than a tenth of the size of cutting-edge devices, but it also costs only around €1 million, making it much cheaper."

doi.org/10.1016/S026...

Don't really have a million laying around 😅
March 28, 2026 at 10:24 AM
That's simply not true. We have used the term learning in "machine learning" for decades.
Regardless, your description of the cells being programmed like semiconductors is fundamentally wrong.
March 9, 2026 at 12:19 AM
As someone who has worked for/with this company, could people let me know how they perceive applications like this or how they think this works?

It would be interesting to compare perception versus reality.
March 8, 2026 at 4:32 PM
As someone who has worked for/with this company, could people let me know how they perceive applications like this or how they think this works?

It would be interesting to compare perception versus reality.
March 8, 2026 at 3:55 PM
Not at all. These neurons don't work in any way similar to semiconductors. They are not programmed, they learn.
March 8, 2026 at 3:52 PM
As someone who has worked with this company before, what makes you uncomfortable specifically?
I am very curious about what is being perceived/understood by the general population.
March 8, 2026 at 3:48 PM
Belgian law is very clear on this and there is a Mohel with adequate training available. Complaint came from within the local Jewish community.
In addition, Belgium knows separation of the judiciary and the executive branches of government.
February 19, 2026 at 12:12 AM
You assumed first I didn't look at the list, then you just whine, proceed to not give the context in which these are acceptable, while highlighting highly problematic practices.

We need less people like you in academia. Thx.
January 18, 2026 at 10:38 PM
Please do go on the record which QRPs you think are acceptable here.
January 18, 2026 at 10:24 PM
Not surprisingly at all sadly. The whole system is broken.
January 18, 2026 at 3:00 PM
The responses to it are a bit overblown though, imo.
January 18, 2026 at 2:28 PM
Genuinely had no clue from the marketing that this is what they are going for...
January 10, 2026 at 1:23 PM
Girl, it's a tiny field compared to the rest.

Leave it.
October 26, 2025 at 10:57 PM
In terms of volume of publications, quite fringe.
October 26, 2025 at 9:40 PM
Most fields put PI last tbh. So strange the see others do it differently. Still a broken metric anyway.
October 26, 2025 at 2:28 PM
My mind immediately went to all the particle physicists! Shows how broken this metric is.
October 26, 2025 at 2:26 PM
Next Nobel Prize winner?
October 16, 2025 at 4:14 PM
This tweet is still up btw
September 22, 2025 at 11:32 PM
Meanwhile Nature is bombarding us with all these models that can predict what diseases we will have in the next few decades. Even branding it the "oracle of health".
September 20, 2025 at 1:04 AM
I don't understand what I am reading here?
Can the editor not read the article? I have never seen a requirement like this before.
September 19, 2025 at 12:14 AM
This was the plan from the start.
September 18, 2025 at 10:13 PM