debbienapper34.bsky.social
@debbienapper34.bsky.social
Reposted
Always remember January 6.

Always fight for democracy, peace, and equality for all.

Always fight for civility, decency, and the rule of law.
January 3, 2025 at 8:32 PM
@connieb5er.bsky.social Happy New Year to you all, and GOD bless America 🇺🇸
January 4, 2025 at 2:47 PM
Reposted
🟦💯🟦💯🟦💯🟦
January 4, 2025 at 10:51 AM
Reposted
January 4, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Reposted
I honestly don't think you need to spend any time at all reading his incomprehensible messages. You can chalk this up to PTSD and toxic masculinity. Basically, 'Men will really blow up a cybertruck at a Trump hotel rather than going to therapy.'
January 4, 2025 at 2:34 PM
Reposted
By blaming immigration for a crime that appears to have been committed by a man born in Texas, Trump is deflecting responsibility from the real perpetrators while endangering the lives of innocent people who came to the U.S. legally
www.dailykos.com/stories/2025...
TRUMP LIES Despicably About the Tragedy in New Orleans, the Suspect, the Crime Rate, and Himself
New Year's Eve is a time of celebration and hope for a future filled with the promise of peace and prosperity. This year however, for revelers in New Orleans it has become a nightmare due to a horrifi...
www.dailykos.com
January 2, 2025 at 12:03 PM
Reposted
Here’s why I love BlueSky: The elegant proof by induction that I was about to scribble came up among the replies to my conjecture:
January 2, 2025 at 1:04 PM
Reposted
This is an especially important reminder. The Court cannot redeem itself by acting lawfully most of the time while it abandons law when the stakes are the highest:
11/ Like those who believe that government is not in trouble until we see tanks in the streets, those who still defend this Court may believe that as long as the overtly political and outrageous decisions constitute a minority of the Court’s work, we are still more-or-less fine.
January 3, 2025 at 1:56 PM
Reposted
Thoughtful framework much appreciated ⬇️
In a democracy, when and where should majorities rule? And when should their powers be limited? Steve Levitsky and I propose a framework to think through these questions in a new piece in the January 2025 issue of 'Journal of Democracy'
muse.jhu.edu/article/947880
January 3, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Reposted
“The Supreme Court’s chief justice, John Roberts, is now echoing Trump’s demand that people stop criticizing him, his colleagues, and other federal jurists — while continuing to pretend that judges are not political.”

www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
John Roberts Absurdly Suggests the Supreme Court Has No 'Political Bias'
The Supreme Court’s chief justice bashed “public officials” who criticize judges for partisan rulings “without a credible basis for such allegations.”
www.rollingstone.com
January 3, 2025 at 1:23 PM