The preferred assumption is that the necessity is the motivating part but people should have to prove that they are not, in fact, primarily motivated by unpleasantness before we extend the courtesy of letting them say that.
The preferred assumption is that the necessity is the motivating part but people should have to prove that they are not, in fact, primarily motivated by unpleasantness before we extend the courtesy of letting them say that.
1. "The natural habitat for the earth is water"
2. "It's very difficult to deconstruct why anything changes"
Both arguments are in service of the same fundamental belief: humans are free of responsibility to the world.
"As we all know, the natural habitat for the Earth is actually water."
1. "The natural habitat for the earth is water"
2. "It's very difficult to deconstruct why anything changes"
Both arguments are in service of the same fundamental belief: humans are free of responsibility to the world.
Hang this shit in the Louvre.
Hang this shit in the Louvre.
Russia can't take Ukraine. The US can't protect the strait of Hormuz. War isn't feasible anymore. Sorry dipshits, you'll just have to live with peace and prosperity.
Russia can't take Ukraine. The US can't protect the strait of Hormuz. War isn't feasible anymore. Sorry dipshits, you'll just have to live with peace and prosperity.
BUT, as politics, accepting the correctness of this point is effectively giving up on American democracy and your own legitimacy as a subject within it. He is wrong to expect people to just accept that.
BUT, as politics, accepting the correctness of this point is effectively giving up on American democracy and your own legitimacy as a subject within it. He is wrong to expect people to just accept that.
Do not help this fucking guy. Do not give him an out. Keep twisting the knife.
Waltz must call a press conference: "I am not on a similar wavelength with trump, we never agreed to anything, he murdered innocent Americans and that blood doesn't wash off."
Do not help this fucking guy. Do not give him an out. Keep twisting the knife.
Waltz must call a press conference: "I am not on a similar wavelength with trump, we never agreed to anything, he murdered innocent Americans and that blood doesn't wash off."
And many elite americans aren't in a place emotionally to reckon with that.
And many elite americans aren't in a place emotionally to reckon with that.
“But if we get rid of ICE, who will stop the rampaging hordes of scary foreigners?” isn’t good politics. It’s ceding the issue to liars.
“But if we get rid of ICE, who will stop the rampaging hordes of scary foreigners?” isn’t good politics. It’s ceding the issue to liars.
One might simply say that they like posting on X more than they dislike hanging with predators, but that isn't what would be published in the independent, is it?
One might simply say that they like posting on X more than they dislike hanging with predators, but that isn't what would be published in the independent, is it?
5 year old me: yeah I know....
Tour guide: green iguanas live in the mangroves.
Adult me: wow holy shit.
5 year old me: yeah I know....
Tour guide: green iguanas live in the mangroves.
Adult me: wow holy shit.
“We need people to do the jobs Americans are too spoiled to do," said one farmer and three-time Trump voter.
BARTIROMO: Right
🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴
This court will gladly find some embarrassed rationale for why only republicans have the right to rule. We on the left should make them say it aloud, but then what's next?
- Go back into Judge Kaczmaryk's court to dissolve all of his nationwide orders.
- Pass gun bans and insist any order applies only to plaintiffs.
This court will gladly find some embarrassed rationale for why only republicans have the right to rule. We on the left should make them say it aloud, but then what's next?
Not to worry though, he's "working on it" to make sure grok won't provide any actual value.
Not to worry though, he's "working on it" to make sure grok won't provide any actual value.