@eisenblm.bsky.social
University professor; research scientist; pro-vaccine; pro-affordable healthcare for all Americans; I believe that Democracy is the best form of government - let us hope we can maintain it. Slava Ukraini!!
Mr. Ali. You were once a well respected commentator. But you keeping descending into the rabbit hole of performative nonsense, for what I can only surmise is to gain more followers. You are only doing the MAGA fascists bidding as your posts demonize the d(D)emocratic opposition.
September 21, 2026 at 5:15 PM
Mr. Ali. You were once a well respected commentator. But you keeping descending into the rabbit hole of performative nonsense, for what I can only surmise is to gain more followers. You are only doing the MAGA fascists bidding as your posts demonize the d(D)emocratic opposition.
Enough of this BS. The primaries are over. Let’s show strong support for all Democrats this November to defeat the MAGA Republicans.
August 28, 2026 at 12:01 PM
Enough of this BS. The primaries are over. Let’s show strong support for all Democrats this November to defeat the MAGA Republicans.
You are gaslighting again
August 15, 2026 at 12:22 PM
You are gaslighting again
Oh come one. Almost every prominent Michigan has endorsed Sayed. In no world would one expect 100% unanimity.
August 6, 2026 at 9:26 PM
Oh come one. Almost every prominent Michigan has endorsed Sayed. In no world would one expect 100% unanimity.
Saying that the GOP’s Islamophobia is shameless is a great understatement. It is just grotesque and evil.
August 6, 2026 at 11:43 AM
Saying that the GOP’s Islamophobia is shameless is a great understatement. It is just grotesque and evil.
Such a good way to try to convince someone of the correctness of your opinions is just hurl invectives against them.
August 1, 2026 at 2:16 AM
Such a good way to try to convince someone of the correctness of your opinions is just hurl invectives against them.
Track AIPAC is a hyper dishonest source of info that associates any organization that is Jewish affiliated with being AIPAC. For example, if one receives support from J Street, which has long opposed AIPAC, then Track AIPAC then tallies that as being AIPAC funding.
August 1, 2026 at 2:14 AM
Track AIPAC is a hyper dishonest source of info that associates any organization that is Jewish affiliated with being AIPAC. For example, if one receives support from J Street, which has long opposed AIPAC, then Track AIPAC then tallies that as being AIPAC funding.
You may disagree with her comments today, but to claim she made those comments because she is under “control” of AIPAC is a remnant of an age old conspiracy theory.
August 1, 2026 at 1:47 AM
You may disagree with her comments today, but to claim she made those comments because she is under “control” of AIPAC is a remnant of an age old conspiracy theory.
She neither receives nor can control AIPAC spending in this race, so there is no money she can return.
August 1, 2026 at 1:43 AM
She neither receives nor can control AIPAC spending in this race, so there is no money she can return.
Regarding AIPAC, they are a PAC that operates independent of the candidates they favor. Stevens has little control over AIPAC’s ad buys, as the group main interest is just defeating AES. (3/3)
July 31, 2026 at 11:59 PM
Regarding AIPAC, they are a PAC that operates independent of the candidates they favor. Stevens has little control over AIPAC’s ad buys, as the group main interest is just defeating AES. (3/3)
But it could be argued that a more narrow bill that would have cut of only offensive weapons or only all military (but not humanitarian) aid, would have garnered broader support. (2/3)⬇️
July 31, 2026 at 11:59 PM
But it could be argued that a more narrow bill that would have cut of only offensive weapons or only all military (but not humanitarian) aid, would have garnered broader support. (2/3)⬇️
Stevens voted against a bill that would have stopped all military & humanitarian aid to Israel that was previously approved. I would have supported that bill as aid to Israel should be conditional on their behavior & the makeup of their govt. (1/3) ⬇️
July 31, 2026 at 11:59 PM
Stevens voted against a bill that would have stopped all military & humanitarian aid to Israel that was previously approved. I would have supported that bill as aid to Israel should be conditional on their behavior & the makeup of their govt. (1/3) ⬇️
To be fair, Abdul blamed Haley for being under the control of AIPAC. I wish both candidates would stop pandering to the worst instincts of their followers.
July 31, 2026 at 11:23 AM
To be fair, Abdul blamed Haley for being under the control of AIPAC. I wish both candidates would stop pandering to the worst instincts of their followers.
There should be a new entry in all the dictionaries, which describes a level of stupidity that is utterly unfathomable as being Tubervillian.
July 29, 2026 at 9:22 PM
There should be a new entry in all the dictionaries, which describes a level of stupidity that is utterly unfathomable as being Tubervillian.
An outbreak of explosive diarrhea is the perfect metaphor for the Trump administration.
July 24, 2026 at 11:12 AM
An outbreak of explosive diarrhea is the perfect metaphor for the Trump administration.
You sound like Trump & his enablers who only believe that the real reason people vote against him is that they are paid with dark money. Do not go down this rabbit hole spouting a conspiracy theory about Stevens. You are better than this.
July 19, 2026 at 4:48 PM
You sound like Trump & his enablers who only believe that the real reason people vote against him is that they are paid with dark money. Do not go down this rabbit hole spouting a conspiracy theory about Stevens. You are better than this.
Maybe that was the director’s aim, but Oppenheimer was an awful movie. Neither the depiction of Oppenheimer nor the history of the time was accurate. Nolan’s commentary was not just unsubtle but undermined by the movie’s inaccuracies. The movie was all flashy film techniques w/o substance.
July 19, 2026 at 11:59 AM
Maybe that was the director’s aim, but Oppenheimer was an awful movie. Neither the depiction of Oppenheimer nor the history of the time was accurate. Nolan’s commentary was not just unsubtle but undermined by the movie’s inaccuracies. The movie was all flashy film techniques w/o substance.
No, that is not what this episode is showing. Instead it shows that Andy Beshear specifically is too cautious & is thus, not presidential material.
July 18, 2026 at 5:02 PM
No, that is not what this episode is showing. Instead it shows that Andy Beshear specifically is too cautious & is thus, not presidential material.
A reasonable position
July 11, 2026 at 12:05 AM
A reasonable position
You try to come off as a rational Democratic supporter. So stop with the circular firing squad BS that does nothing but help MAGA. That’s what your ad hominem attack on Psaki was. Psaki supports big tent coalition to thwart MAGA, so she interviews many Dem candidates across the political spectrum.
July 9, 2026 at 11:31 AM
You try to come off as a rational Democratic supporter. So stop with the circular firing squad BS that does nothing but help MAGA. That’s what your ad hominem attack on Psaki was. Psaki supports big tent coalition to thwart MAGA, so she interviews many Dem candidates across the political spectrum.
As you said, you don’t watch Psaki. If you did, you would know she never kissed Platner’s ass. She interviews lots of Democratic candidates, incl. Platner 3 times, cause he garnered a lot of support in Maine. She asked him about his policy views & the various controversies he faced. Good journalism
July 9, 2026 at 3:06 AM
As you said, you don’t watch Psaki. If you did, you would know she never kissed Platner’s ass. She interviews lots of Democratic candidates, incl. Platner 3 times, cause he garnered a lot of support in Maine. She asked him about his policy views & the various controversies he faced. Good journalism
The #1 criteria for establishment Dems was whether one could flip Maine to their side. No difference if they’re progressive, liberal or centrist. Progressives f’cked up by not vetting their preferred candidate & then when bad things came out they doubled down. Unlike CA Dems who dumped Swalwell.
July 6, 2026 at 8:52 PM
The #1 criteria for establishment Dems was whether one could flip Maine to their side. No difference if they’re progressive, liberal or centrist. Progressives f’cked up by not vetting their preferred candidate & then when bad things came out they doubled down. Unlike CA Dems who dumped Swalwell.
Inflammatory, racist & disgusting. An intentional mischaracterization that violates journalist ethics.
July 6, 2026 at 11:22 AM
Inflammatory, racist & disgusting. An intentional mischaracterization that violates journalist ethics.
A problem w/ Progressives is that they pay little attention to candidate vetting. We need more progressives like Abdul El-Sayed & Analilia Mejia - both talented politicians & ethical humans. And less Platners & Chevaliers, whose ethical deficiencies would fill volumes of books.
July 1, 2026 at 11:32 AM
A problem w/ Progressives is that they pay little attention to candidate vetting. We need more progressives like Abdul El-Sayed & Analilia Mejia - both talented politicians & ethical humans. And less Platners & Chevaliers, whose ethical deficiencies would fill volumes of books.
Supporting SCOTUS reform without supporting expanding the court will literally do nothing.
July 1, 2026 at 11:14 AM
Supporting SCOTUS reform without supporting expanding the court will literally do nothing.