Guillaume Cabanac
banner
gcabanac.cpesr.fr
Guillaume Cabanac
@gcabanac.cpesr.fr
‘Deception Sleuth’ #Nature10 Scientist go.nature.com/3B29NgY • CS Prof. Univ. Toulouse @IUFrance.bsky.social • Metascience + Scientific Text Mining • https://www.irit.fr/~Guillaume.Cabanac

@gcabanac at X
@[email protected] at Mastodon
In which thesaurus Kyrgyzstan is a synonym of Gibbs?! Fortunately AI will help us solve this mystery 🤣 Ahaha

‘The Science of The Total Environment’ by @elsevierconnect.bsky.social is retracting dbrech.irit.fr/pls/apex/f?p... and expressing concerns dbrech.irit.fr/pls/apex/f?p... quite rightfully...
August 15, 2026 at 12:42 PM
If you send me the list of 1 million DOIs of CSDL, I can filter the PPS results for you. (I didn't find how to download the CSDL metadata)
August 14, 2026 at 4:31 PM
Here is the associated PubPeer comment: pubpeer.com/publications...
August 14, 2026 at 4:18 PM
Right. Edit: “check them against the CSDL search engine" like this: www.computer.org/csdl/search/...
August 14, 2026 at 4:15 PM
One can download the CSV dump from the PPS (menu Actions/Download), extract the DOI column, and check them against @ieeexplore.ieee.org.
August 14, 2026 at 4:02 PM
Quite surprising: Some IEEE ‘tortured’ conferences organised several editions, with ‘tortured’ articles accepted each year. See “How a Tortured Conference Becomes a Series:
An Analysis of Conference Manipulations” published in ACM/IEEEE JCDL'25 ut3-toulouseinp.hal.science/hal-05497913...
August 14, 2026 at 3:55 PM
Reposted by Guillaume Cabanac
The PPS Tortured detector tabulates 8626 IEEE articles with tortured phrases, 62% of which have been posted on @PubPeer.com: dbrech.irit.fr/pls/apex/f?p.... The PPS Annulled detector finds that 46% (3966/8626) of the IEEE articles with tortured phrases are retracted: dbrech.irit.fr/pls/apex/f?p...
August 14, 2026 at 3:44 PM
The PPS Tortured detector tabulates 8626 IEEE articles with tortured phrases, 62% of which have been posted on @PubPeer.com: dbrech.irit.fr/pls/apex/f?p.... The PPS Annulled detector finds that 46% (3966/8626) of the IEEE articles with tortured phrases are retracted: dbrech.irit.fr/pls/apex/f?p...
August 14, 2026 at 3:44 PM
Retraction rate: 36% = 227 of the 634 IEEE articles you reported on PubPeer for tortured phrases identified by the PPS Tortured detector dbrech.irit.fr/pls/apex/f?p...
August 14, 2026 at 3:33 PM
Here are the 634 IEEE articles that the PPS flagged with tortured phrases and that you reported on PubPeer, @lonnibesancon.bsky.social. The last column links to the PubPeer posts. dbrech.irit.fr/pls/apex/f?p...
August 14, 2026 at 3:29 PM
Use #bibCheck if you are a French academic: it's an online tool that audits bibliographies and reports retracted or inexistent references, developed in collaboration with @cnrs-inist.bsky.social (see slide 25 ut3-toulouseinp.hal.science/hal-05646645...). Otherwise check github.com/gianlucasb/h...
June 30, 2026 at 3:26 PM
Reposted by Guillaume Cabanac
Use #bibCheck if you are a French academic: it's an online tool that audits bibliographies and reports retracted or inexistent references, developed in collaboration with @cnrs-inist.bsky.social (see slide 25 ut3-toulouseinp.hal.science/hal-05646645...). Otherwise check github.com/gianlucasb/h...
June 30, 2026 at 3:24 PM
Use #bibCheck if you are a French academic: it's an online tool that audits bibliographies and reports retracted or inexistent references, developed in collaboration with @cnrs-inist.bsky.social (see slide 25 ut3-toulouseinp.hal.science/hal-05646645...). Otherwise check github.com/gianlucasb/h...
June 30, 2026 at 3:24 PM
Autre publisher, autre pratique : SAGE cite 2 de mes articles (tortured phrases et foot of clay) dans une notice de rétractation qui porte sur des centaines d'articles content.iospress.com/download/jou...
June 1, 2026 at 8:05 PM
Il faudrait que les publishers citent d’autres papiers dont je suis auteur : sur les sneaked références, les stealth corrections, les tortured conference series, les feet of clay… Ahah !
June 1, 2026 at 7:48 PM
Et tu as raison : ça fait +1 en nombre de citations à chaque rétractation (dizaines par jour). Pourquoi est-ce indexé différemment sur pour @ioppublishing.bsky.social, mystère ?!

Quoi qu’il en soit, ces citations n’augmentent pas mon h-index (métrique bancale, au passage)…
June 1, 2026 at 7:47 PM
@ioppublishing.bsky.social mentionne dans ses notices de rétractation notre preprint qui a introduit les ‘tortured phrases’. Je dis « mentionne » car la réf n’est pas considérée comme étant dans une bibliographie et n’est pas indexée.

Le cas que tu commentes : @springernature.com cite le preprint…
June 1, 2026 at 7:44 PM