In two rounds of testimony we demonstrated that his empirical claims about manipulation in the 2020 election were false. This took a lot of time ( and lack of sleep) but it demonstrates the importance of careful quantitative social science for the “real world” www.politico.com/news/2026/04...
In two rounds of testimony we demonstrated that his empirical claims about manipulation in the 2020 election were false. This took a lot of time ( and lack of sleep) but it demonstrates the importance of careful quantitative social science for the “real world” www.politico.com/news/2026/04...
“Maybe if we are mean enough to people offering an opinion on AI we can avoid any disruption to our industry” a surprisingly large number of academics, apparently.
By the way assertions like “tool X can’t do Y” are difficult to provide evidence for, but if you could that’d be a cool paper to write
February 26, 2026 at 2:35 AM
“Maybe if we are mean enough to people offering an opinion on AI we can avoid any disruption to our industry” a surprisingly large number of academics, apparently.
By the way assertions like “tool X can’t do Y” are difficult to provide evidence for, but if you could that’d be a cool paper to write
This is an absurd conspiracy theory from @spoonamore.bsky.social . He provides no evidence for the claimed "hack". Remarkably, we have tracked similar ridiculous arguments from rightwing election skeptics for the past four years. cc @r5-to-philly.bsky.social
So. I was on @thomhartmann.bsky.social radio yesterday. I totally admire that guy. He's put in decades trying to make the world better informed. Respect. I thought it went pretty well. 1M+ folks heard it. Thom reposted it here. #Recountwww.youtube.com/watch?v=RJR5...
This is an absurd conspiracy theory from @spoonamore.bsky.social . He provides no evidence for the claimed "hack". Remarkably, we have tracked similar ridiculous arguments from rightwing election skeptics for the past four years. cc @r5-to-philly.bsky.social