PRIEST: No, the GPS says we have to keep going—
SKULL: I KNOW A SHORTCUT
PRIEST: Do you remember the last ti—
SKULL: FOR THOSE WITH FAITH, NO EVIDENCE IS NECESSARY; FOR THOSE WITHOUT IT, NO EVIDENCE WILL SUFFICE
Photograph by Daniel Ibanez
PRIEST: No, the GPS says we have to keep going—
SKULL: I KNOW A SHORTCUT
PRIEST: Do you remember the last ti—
SKULL: FOR THOSE WITH FAITH, NO EVIDENCE IS NECESSARY; FOR THOSE WITHOUT IT, NO EVIDENCE WILL SUFFICE
Dinosaurs didn't have cats and look what happened to them.
Dinosaurs didn't have cats and look what happened to them.
Můj komentář pro Hospodářky
archiv.hn.cz/c1-67882960-...
Můj komentář pro Hospodářky
archiv.hn.cz/c1-67882960-...
Known as ‘Peckham Rock’, this hoax cave art with a figure pushing a shopping trolley, included an authentic-looking label and was on display for 3 days! 😳
Marker pen on concrete! 😁
📷 by me
#Archaeology
Known as ‘Peckham Rock’, this hoax cave art with a figure pushing a shopping trolley, included an authentic-looking label and was on display for 3 days! 😳
Marker pen on concrete! 😁
📷 by me
#Archaeology
IRAN: “How about, instead, you do everything we ask and we’ll call it a day?”
TRUMP: “Deal.”
FOX NEWS: “Awesome Trump is the world’s most masterful negotiator!”
IRAN: “How about, instead, you do everything we ask and we’ll call it a day?”
TRUMP: “Deal.”
FOX NEWS: “Awesome Trump is the world’s most masterful negotiator!”
"Welcome!" the professor said, "When I press this button, we will instantly travel faster than light."
"How much faster?"
"Infinitely."
"Where will we go?"
"Around the whole universe."
He pressed the button.
"We're back!"
"Welcome!" the professor said, "When I press this button, we will instantly travel faster than light."
"How much faster?"
"Infinitely."
"Where will we go?"
"Around the whole universe."
He pressed the button.
"We're back!"
Karel Čapek
Karel Čapek
Whatever faults Camacho et al. had, they deferred to the (perceived) expert, and they still had the public's best interests in mind, even if they didn't know how to go at it.
They were ignorant, not malevolent.
Whatever faults Camacho et al. had, they deferred to the (perceived) expert, and they still had the public's best interests in mind, even if they didn't know how to go at it.
They were ignorant, not malevolent.