🦚 Pragmatic Progressive 🦚
@mikedaily.bsky.social
We’re the only group who
1) identify the underlying problems
2) openly call them out
3) and put everything on the line to challenge and change them:
Anti-Est
Anti-Corruption
Anti-Capitalism (unchecked)
Anti-Fascism
Pro-Climate/Eco
Pro-Democracy
Etc
1) identify the underlying problems
2) openly call them out
3) and put everything on the line to challenge and change them:
Anti-Est
Anti-Corruption
Anti-Capitalism (unchecked)
Anti-Fascism
Pro-Climate/Eco
Pro-Democracy
Etc
Trans discrimination.
Not only that, but men who identify as men, but have biologically low testosterone.
Not only that, but men who identify as men, but have biologically low testosterone.
September 20, 2026 at 1:17 AM
Trans discrimination.
Not only that, but men who identify as men, but have biologically low testosterone.
Not only that, but men who identify as men, but have biologically low testosterone.
It is diplomacy at gun point.
September 19, 2026 at 11:38 AM
It is diplomacy at gun point.
From what I’ve read, it looks like permanent US military presence, fly over, blocking China and Russia, controlling “sensitive” investments meaning things which the US deem a threat to their interests, etc.
But pls use your head - a big permanent US military presence - is a form of control.
But pls use your head - a big permanent US military presence - is a form of control.
September 19, 2026 at 11:08 AM
From what I’ve read, it looks like permanent US military presence, fly over, blocking China and Russia, controlling “sensitive” investments meaning things which the US deem a threat to their interests, etc.
But pls use your head - a big permanent US military presence - is a form of control.
But pls use your head - a big permanent US military presence - is a form of control.
Please remember - his time is short.
Don’t think he will be in power forever.
Don’t think he will be in power forever.
September 19, 2026 at 6:44 AM
Please remember - his time is short.
Don’t think he will be in power forever.
Don’t think he will be in power forever.
Trump Admin are toxic, traitorous, corrupt, cry babies 🚼
September 19, 2026 at 4:24 AM
Trump Admin are toxic, traitorous, corrupt, cry babies 🚼
It should be 5 billion, but let’s go 🙌🏻🥳👊🏻
September 19, 2026 at 3:59 AM
It should be 5 billion, but let’s go 🙌🏻🥳👊🏻
Dude’s got one foot in the grave.
Midterms are 40 days out.
Dems take back the House and go into a big accountability campaign.
Trump vacated Jan 2029, if he eveb makes it that far.
The tables are starting to turn.
They really are.
Patience 🦗 s
Midterms are 40 days out.
Dems take back the House and go into a big accountability campaign.
Trump vacated Jan 2029, if he eveb makes it that far.
The tables are starting to turn.
They really are.
Patience 🦗 s
September 19, 2026 at 3:48 AM
Dude’s got one foot in the grave.
Midterms are 40 days out.
Dems take back the House and go into a big accountability campaign.
Trump vacated Jan 2029, if he eveb makes it that far.
The tables are starting to turn.
They really are.
Patience 🦗 s
Midterms are 40 days out.
Dems take back the House and go into a big accountability campaign.
Trump vacated Jan 2029, if he eveb makes it that far.
The tables are starting to turn.
They really are.
Patience 🦗 s
No surprises there.
But also no evidence that it was intentional.
I’m as anti Trump/Admin as they come, but they didn’t knowingly target a bunch of school girls.
Please use your brains.
But also no evidence that it was intentional.
I’m as anti Trump/Admin as they come, but they didn’t knowingly target a bunch of school girls.
Please use your brains.
September 19, 2026 at 3:35 AM
No surprises there.
But also no evidence that it was intentional.
I’m as anti Trump/Admin as they come, but they didn’t knowingly target a bunch of school girls.
Please use your brains.
But also no evidence that it was intentional.
I’m as anti Trump/Admin as they come, but they didn’t knowingly target a bunch of school girls.
Please use your brains.
Not really.
It’s an aggressive, US-heavy agreement.
I’m surprised Greenland and Denmark gave in so easily.
And we all know that once the US is fully established there, they’re going to test the limits of the agreement, if they abide at all.
Esp if things heat up afa the new world order dynamics.
It’s an aggressive, US-heavy agreement.
I’m surprised Greenland and Denmark gave in so easily.
And we all know that once the US is fully established there, they’re going to test the limits of the agreement, if they abide at all.
Esp if things heat up afa the new world order dynamics.
September 19, 2026 at 3:32 AM
Not really.
It’s an aggressive, US-heavy agreement.
I’m surprised Greenland and Denmark gave in so easily.
And we all know that once the US is fully established there, they’re going to test the limits of the agreement, if they abide at all.
Esp if things heat up afa the new world order dynamics.
It’s an aggressive, US-heavy agreement.
I’m surprised Greenland and Denmark gave in so easily.
And we all know that once the US is fully established there, they’re going to test the limits of the agreement, if they abide at all.
Esp if things heat up afa the new world order dynamics.
It’s your mess.
You clean it up.
You clean it up.
September 19, 2026 at 3:28 AM
It’s your mess.
You clean it up.
You clean it up.
Desperate authoritarianism.
Putin’s days are numbered.
And Russia is heading for a cliff.
Putin’s days are numbered.
And Russia is heading for a cliff.
September 19, 2026 at 12:53 AM
Desperate authoritarianism.
Putin’s days are numbered.
And Russia is heading for a cliff.
Putin’s days are numbered.
And Russia is heading for a cliff.
Reps hate that Dems have so much power over powerful California.
But this is exactly what the country should be doing about AI.
The rest of the country is likely to follow.
Good job Newsom! (even though I’m not a fan and don’t want him to be the next Dem candidate for Prez)
But this is exactly what the country should be doing about AI.
The rest of the country is likely to follow.
Good job Newsom! (even though I’m not a fan and don’t want him to be the next Dem candidate for Prez)
September 19, 2026 at 12:51 AM
Reps hate that Dems have so much power over powerful California.
But this is exactly what the country should be doing about AI.
The rest of the country is likely to follow.
Good job Newsom! (even though I’m not a fan and don’t want him to be the next Dem candidate for Prez)
But this is exactly what the country should be doing about AI.
The rest of the country is likely to follow.
Good job Newsom! (even though I’m not a fan and don’t want him to be the next Dem candidate for Prez)
He can try.
Let’s see what the courts say and do.
Let’s see what the courts say and do.
September 19, 2026 at 12:49 AM
He can try.
Let’s see what the courts say and do.
Let’s see what the courts say and do.
If Trump’s Pentagon says 45, it’s probably double that.
September 19, 2026 at 12:49 AM
If Trump’s Pentagon says 45, it’s probably double that.
For all of the tough talk from Denmark, Greenland and the EU, this is a clear capitulation to the Trump Admin and The Pentagon.
And it’s obvious that once the US has their full military capability there, it’s meaningless that technically they are sovereign on paper.
Very disappointing and weak imo.
And it’s obvious that once the US has their full military capability there, it’s meaningless that technically they are sovereign on paper.
Very disappointing and weak imo.
September 19, 2026 at 12:48 AM
For all of the tough talk from Denmark, Greenland and the EU, this is a clear capitulation to the Trump Admin and The Pentagon.
And it’s obvious that once the US has their full military capability there, it’s meaningless that technically they are sovereign on paper.
Very disappointing and weak imo.
And it’s obvious that once the US has their full military capability there, it’s meaningless that technically they are sovereign on paper.
Very disappointing and weak imo.
It’s easy to poke fun, but Vance looks like he will be the next Rep candidate, regardless of the chaos of Trump term 2.
And after a year+ of campaigning, ad blitzkriegs, divisive rhetoric, and a binary choice on election day, it’s likely going to be a (near) 50/50 split in swing state districts.
And after a year+ of campaigning, ad blitzkriegs, divisive rhetoric, and a binary choice on election day, it’s likely going to be a (near) 50/50 split in swing state districts.
September 19, 2026 at 12:31 AM
It’s easy to poke fun, but Vance looks like he will be the next Rep candidate, regardless of the chaos of Trump term 2.
And after a year+ of campaigning, ad blitzkriegs, divisive rhetoric, and a binary choice on election day, it’s likely going to be a (near) 50/50 split in swing state districts.
And after a year+ of campaigning, ad blitzkriegs, divisive rhetoric, and a binary choice on election day, it’s likely going to be a (near) 50/50 split in swing state districts.
Yes but midterms are around the corner.
Which will put a lot more pressure on Trump/Admin and GOP.
Ironically, many on the right want Trump to be reigned in, but they don’t dare confront him publicly.
That will start to change after the midterms, and build to a crescendo after the general.
Yay 🥳
Which will put a lot more pressure on Trump/Admin and GOP.
Ironically, many on the right want Trump to be reigned in, but they don’t dare confront him publicly.
That will start to change after the midterms, and build to a crescendo after the general.
Yay 🥳
September 19, 2026 at 12:26 AM
Yes but midterms are around the corner.
Which will put a lot more pressure on Trump/Admin and GOP.
Ironically, many on the right want Trump to be reigned in, but they don’t dare confront him publicly.
That will start to change after the midterms, and build to a crescendo after the general.
Yay 🥳
Which will put a lot more pressure on Trump/Admin and GOP.
Ironically, many on the right want Trump to be reigned in, but they don’t dare confront him publicly.
That will start to change after the midterms, and build to a crescendo after the general.
Yay 🥳
Yes but I’m talking like pennies.
September 18, 2026 at 2:30 PM
Yes but I’m talking like pennies.
Well shit. 🫣
September 18, 2026 at 2:30 PM
Well shit. 🫣
True.
But the courts also vote against Trump/GOP interests very regularly.
And if Dems win back the House, expect a lot more accountability.
Dems will reverse most or all of the ICE nightmare, and so much more.
Yes it’s a nightmare - but it’s far from a fascist takeover.
They have limited power.
But the courts also vote against Trump/GOP interests very regularly.
And if Dems win back the House, expect a lot more accountability.
Dems will reverse most or all of the ICE nightmare, and so much more.
Yes it’s a nightmare - but it’s far from a fascist takeover.
They have limited power.
September 18, 2026 at 1:41 PM
True.
But the courts also vote against Trump/GOP interests very regularly.
And if Dems win back the House, expect a lot more accountability.
Dems will reverse most or all of the ICE nightmare, and so much more.
Yes it’s a nightmare - but it’s far from a fascist takeover.
They have limited power.
But the courts also vote against Trump/GOP interests very regularly.
And if Dems win back the House, expect a lot more accountability.
Dems will reverse most or all of the ICE nightmare, and so much more.
Yes it’s a nightmare - but it’s far from a fascist takeover.
They have limited power.
And in time the costs will go down to almost nil.
At least according to some experts who I trust.
At least according to some experts who I trust.
September 18, 2026 at 9:01 AM
And in time the costs will go down to almost nil.
At least according to some experts who I trust.
At least according to some experts who I trust.
It’s not inconceivable that AI ushers in an age of tech warfare, with far fewer human casualties.
At least for the more advanced military nations.
Bc why not only take out their critical systems, military infra, data centers, top brass, etc?
What’s gained by killing civilians, and leveling cities?
At least for the more advanced military nations.
Bc why not only take out their critical systems, military infra, data centers, top brass, etc?
What’s gained by killing civilians, and leveling cities?
September 17, 2026 at 3:56 PM
It’s not inconceivable that AI ushers in an age of tech warfare, with far fewer human casualties.
At least for the more advanced military nations.
Bc why not only take out their critical systems, military infra, data centers, top brass, etc?
What’s gained by killing civilians, and leveling cities?
At least for the more advanced military nations.
Bc why not only take out their critical systems, military infra, data centers, top brass, etc?
What’s gained by killing civilians, and leveling cities?