I feel like "increased control over reproduction leads to lower reproduction" is a *exceptionally* reductive analysis?

Is this going to be a redux of the butts thing with Questionable Content & Something*Positive?

2025, pop Meredith Brooks but w/o the cussing? okay, sure I guess. It's a story each generation can tell.

It's a common enough claim, but there's an addressable counter that simply the risk of being seen to be wrong IS a bet on it. A reputation for credibility is something of value.