I agree with your point about the close-up shots because they really made the emotions feel intense and personal. The fast rise of conflict also showed how small misunderstandings can quickly turn into bigger problems in the community.

I see your point. Comparing your example still feels more like traditional journalism because it focuses on a political issue and reports on real events. But I agree it also shows digital trends, like selecting certain angles and details, which can shape how the audience understands the issue.

I like your example! Compared to mine, yours still feels digital because of the interactive features like audio and links, but it also keeps some traditional elements with evidence and multiple viewpoints. It shows how digital journalism can still be reliable while being more engaging.

Your point about sharing thoughts connects well to ideas from the lecture about participation and voice. Social media lowers barriers for activism and organizing, showing how access can empower everyday people in meaningful ways.

I like how you mention “affordance.” That directly connects to media studies ideas about how technology shapes behavior. Faster communication is a benefit, but as discussed in lecture, the same affordance also makes misinformation spread faster and harder to control.