Totally. In the paper we show that the difference in the use of subjectivity-related terms (emoción, personal) vanishes after controlling for film genre. So, yes, male and female directors should use different motifs

Not in this paper. But there is likely a cross-country component to be studied, both in the gender composition of the industry and the gendered evaluations of artistic merit.

We argue that bias in evaluation may work through withheld recognition, not so much through overt negativity: if evaluators expect excellence less often from women, they may devote less scrutiny to identifying it and award top praise less often.

Reviews of women-directed films are no more negative in sentiment, but films directed by men receive more brilliance- and mastery-related language and greater evaluative effort, especially from male critics.

Por favor, documentense. Aprendan quienes son los racionalistas, enterense de que las empresas de IA hablan de apocalipsis para consolidar su posicion dominante y para que no se hable de los perjuicios que estan causando. Lean al menos el NYT, que contaba todo esto apenas hace una semana!

Por favor, dejen de extender bulos y desinformacion.

Indeed... 😔

Very fair qualification. I am definitely biased by my own experience in social media where I routinely find very proud AI academic users.

2/2 But for many others (e.g. workers, our students) the same technology means deskilling and a threat to their livelihoods. I worry that by mistaking our experience for theirs, academics may end up baffled by that public hostility and detached from the people we are meant to understand.