Circuit courts and SCOTUS? Media? Major law firms? Tech companies with map apps?
Far FAR less so.
But the federal trial courts have done what they can.
Circuit courts and SCOTUS? Media? Major law firms? Tech companies with map apps?
Far FAR less so.
But the federal trial courts have done what they can.
— Require #SCOTUS videostream oral args + opinion announcements (Cameras in the Ctrm)
— Permit district & appeals courts to videostream proceedings (Sunshine in the Ctrm)
Both passed by voice vote; will add text once Congress.gov is fixed.
Judges hiring law clerks based on “ideological adherence” is a bad look for the federal judiciary. Judges are supposed to be neutral arbiters of fact and law. Hiring based on ideology, particularly at the Supreme Court, weakens the courts’ legitimacy.
Judges hiring law clerks based on “ideological adherence” is a bad look for the federal judiciary. Judges are supposed to be neutral arbiters of fact and law. Hiring based on ideology, particularly at the Supreme Court, weakens the courts’ legitimacy.
justiceconnection.substack.com/p/dojs-propo...
justiceconnection.substack.com/p/dojs-propo...
www.bbc.com/culture/arti...
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/13/u...
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/13/u...
Martin has threatened investigations against political enemies and given legal advice to at least one January 6 defendant. These actions violate his professional obligations as a lawyer.
amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/04/...
quartzevelyn.substack.com/p/the-urgent...
quartzevelyn.substack.com/p/the-urgent...
Anyway, here's the ad that the Post's business side didn't want its readers to see ⤵️
thehill.com/media/514849...
Anyway, here's the ad that the Post's business side didn't want its readers to see ⤵️
thehill.com/media/514849...
Re-posting this for no particular reason.
Re-posting this for no particular reason.