@slevemcdichaeloh.bsky.social
It does create an interesting angle, though. Hannity, et al. likely just ignore it rather than openly go against their own network or Trump.
September 21, 2026 at 11:56 PM
It does create an interesting angle, though. Hannity, et al. likely just ignore it rather than openly go against their own network or Trump.
That's why Fox joined the other major news broadcasters in removing themselves from the TV press pool.
September 21, 2026 at 11:55 PM
That's why Fox joined the other major news broadcasters in removing themselves from the TV press pool.
de Becker is, or will be, responsible as well. I saw a clip of him downplaying Polio on Rogan.
September 21, 2026 at 10:05 PM
de Becker is, or will be, responsible as well. I saw a clip of him downplaying Polio on Rogan.
if we value a job enough in society for it to exist, then the people working that job should be compensated well enough to live.
September 19, 2026 at 8:18 PM
if we value a job enough in society for it to exist, then the people working that job should be compensated well enough to live.
I would say I am proud to be a Quaker, but that would not be very Quaker-like.
I am happy to see these Friends shining their inner light.
I am happy to see these Friends shining their inner light.
September 16, 2026 at 8:34 PM
I would say I am proud to be a Quaker, but that would not be very Quaker-like.
I am happy to see these Friends shining their inner light.
I am happy to see these Friends shining their inner light.
I have two questions:
1) What drugs is he on?
2) Gimme some
1) What drugs is he on?
2) Gimme some
September 16, 2026 at 2:26 AM
I have two questions:
1) What drugs is he on?
2) Gimme some
1) What drugs is he on?
2) Gimme some
And therein lies a big part of the problem with academia, right? And finance to be fair! And probably the law...
I have no doubt these are amazing educations, but using them as a proxy for being good feels a bit...circular?
I have no doubt these are amazing educations, but using them as a proxy for being good feels a bit...circular?
September 14, 2026 at 2:54 AM
And therein lies a big part of the problem with academia, right? And finance to be fair! And probably the law...
I have no doubt these are amazing educations, but using them as a proxy for being good feels a bit...circular?
I have no doubt these are amazing educations, but using them as a proxy for being good feels a bit...circular?
Right. The "anti-trans" Dem is also likely in. a district that would not take too kindly to them being openly "pro-trans."
Halting the whittling away of rights >>>>>>>> allowing it to continue
Halting the whittling away of rights >>>>>>>> allowing it to continue
September 13, 2026 at 7:17 AM
Right. The "anti-trans" Dem is also likely in. a district that would not take too kindly to them being openly "pro-trans."
Halting the whittling away of rights >>>>>>>> allowing it to continue
Halting the whittling away of rights >>>>>>>> allowing it to continue
This reminds me of having to turn my head a cough at a sports physical.
I am sure women have worse horror stories than that, but having your dingleberries fondled behind a curtain in the schoom gym is...something.
I am sure women have worse horror stories than that, but having your dingleberries fondled behind a curtain in the schoom gym is...something.
September 11, 2026 at 7:42 PM
This reminds me of having to turn my head a cough at a sports physical.
I am sure women have worse horror stories than that, but having your dingleberries fondled behind a curtain in the schoom gym is...something.
I am sure women have worse horror stories than that, but having your dingleberries fondled behind a curtain in the schoom gym is...something.
Maybe once they get Animal's drinking under control.
September 10, 2026 at 10:40 PM
Maybe once they get Animal's drinking under control.
It's so amazing that they do not realize more people will be aware of the interview now.
September 10, 2026 at 7:13 PM
It's so amazing that they do not realize more people will be aware of the interview now.
Yes. Win the House and pass the bill. Then *hammer* the Senate for not passing it or Trump for vetoing it.
September 10, 2026 at 5:37 PM
Yes. Win the House and pass the bill. Then *hammer* the Senate for not passing it or Trump for vetoing it.
My only hope is that this does not prevent the return of Susan B. Spooky 👻
September 8, 2026 at 3:56 AM
My only hope is that this does not prevent the return of Susan B. Spooky 👻
Yes, I agree.
I cannot say it was the *right* thing to do, but it was a more broadly popular action that people today give it credit for.
I cannot say it was the *right* thing to do, but it was a more broadly popular action that people today give it credit for.
September 6, 2026 at 10:09 PM
Yes, I agree.
I cannot say it was the *right* thing to do, but it was a more broadly popular action that people today give it credit for.
I cannot say it was the *right* thing to do, but it was a more broadly popular action that people today give it credit for.
I am genuinely curious as to what the terrible aspects of his foreign policy were? I am not asking in a snarky way at all- I don't really have much knowledge in the area.
My guess is that Iraq and Afghanistan mostly carried on the same as GWB? Idek if that is a true statement to begin with lol
My guess is that Iraq and Afghanistan mostly carried on the same as GWB? Idek if that is a true statement to begin with lol
September 6, 2026 at 8:34 AM
I am genuinely curious as to what the terrible aspects of his foreign policy were? I am not asking in a snarky way at all- I don't really have much knowledge in the area.
My guess is that Iraq and Afghanistan mostly carried on the same as GWB? Idek if that is a true statement to begin with lol
My guess is that Iraq and Afghanistan mostly carried on the same as GWB? Idek if that is a true statement to begin with lol
Economic issues more directly related to Burns, who kept monetary policy too loose (pressured by Nixon) and oil shocks. There were other issues of course, but a lot of this sounds like the same cliff we are possibly nearing in 2026.
September 5, 2026 at 11:15 PM
Economic issues more directly related to Burns, who kept monetary policy too loose (pressured by Nixon) and oil shocks. There were other issues of course, but a lot of this sounds like the same cliff we are possibly nearing in 2026.
I am not even arguing that using ichain is less risky than putting your passwords on paper and storing the paper. I am saying that the method in and of itself is also a balance of security and convenience.
September 2, 2026 at 7:55 PM
I am not even arguing that using ichain is less risky than putting your passwords on paper and storing the paper. I am saying that the method in and of itself is also a balance of security and convenience.
You missed my point and resorted to childish insults. Cool.
I am curious as to how you prevent fraudsters from stealing your bank info from your bank, though (which was the point of the back door comment).
I am curious as to how you prevent fraudsters from stealing your bank info from your bank, though (which was the point of the back door comment).
September 2, 2026 at 7:53 PM
You missed my point and resorted to childish insults. Cool.
I am curious as to how you prevent fraudsters from stealing your bank info from your bank, though (which was the point of the back door comment).
I am curious as to how you prevent fraudsters from stealing your bank info from your bank, though (which was the point of the back door comment).
You are necessarily accepting risk to begin with because you cannot protect the back door. A hacker does not need my password to access my info from the vendor side.
September 2, 2026 at 7:23 PM
You are necessarily accepting risk to begin with because you cannot protect the back door. A hacker does not need my password to access my info from the vendor side.
It's a good thing that things like convenience and security are not all-or-nothing propositions.
I don't have a SCIF to put my password book in, which means I am necessarily accepting some level of risk by not simply remembering my own passwords. And additional risk by not changing them every day.
I don't have a SCIF to put my password book in, which means I am necessarily accepting some level of risk by not simply remembering my own passwords. And additional risk by not changing them every day.
September 2, 2026 at 7:15 PM
It's a good thing that things like convenience and security are not all-or-nothing propositions.
I don't have a SCIF to put my password book in, which means I am necessarily accepting some level of risk by not simply remembering my own passwords. And additional risk by not changing them every day.
I don't have a SCIF to put my password book in, which means I am necessarily accepting some level of risk by not simply remembering my own passwords. And additional risk by not changing them every day.
This is annoying. I would go delete all instances of the password and start over.
Sometimes I accidentally end up storing a password and no username, too. lol
Sometimes I accidentally end up storing a password and no username, too. lol
September 2, 2026 at 6:22 PM
This is annoying. I would go delete all instances of the password and start over.
Sometimes I accidentally end up storing a password and no username, too. lol
Sometimes I accidentally end up storing a password and no username, too. lol
It's incredible. And it falls under my, "If this building collapses I am already fucked by what is happening outside," level of risk.
September 2, 2026 at 6:21 PM
It's incredible. And it falls under my, "If this building collapses I am already fucked by what is happening outside," level of risk.