make Lakota make sense bruv, it's not that it doesn't make sense at all, but why is it so complicated?

Only two settings here:
monk mode and monkey mode

💯

For many linguists, the path to research on non-literary Indic languages always begins as a Sanskritist, eh?

Emeneau: Sanskrit ↦ Dravidian
Kobayashi: Sanskrit ↦ Dravidian
Tikkanen: Sanskrit ↦ Burushaski
Berger: Sanskrit ↦ Burushaski

“Linguistic evidence of Bantu origins of the Sidis of India” by Abdulaziz Yusuf Lodhi (2008) www.researchgate.net/profile/Abdu...

Yasin Burushaski strongly velarizes /l/, unlike in Hunza.

Furthermore, /l/ and /ɾ/ both devoice before voiceless consonants. The extremely common cluster /lt/ is realized as [l̥t], and /ɾʈ͡ʂ/ as [ʂʈ͡ʂ]. None of this is seen in Hunza.

This makes Yasin Bur. phonetically close to neighboring Khowar.

arguments lately

A small step for man...

I am currently working on a Python script in Lakota, the biggest issue atm is that I don't know Python or Lakota.

Hairy cats are the likely derivation of the English word 'caterpillar' – coming from Old Norman *catepelose, itself from Latin catta 'cat' and pilōsa 'hairy'.

Meanwhile, it was little dogs that were the inspiration for the Modern French equivalent word for the bug (chenille).

time well spent in uni