The point of this isn't to demonise rnli and other charities, although thats a handy side benefit for those who hate compassion. The main aim is continuing the 'invasion' rhetoric which he invokes to rally people around him. We need to challenge the premise of this statement. There is no invasion.

Now at 'there should be an appalled by' button stage of despair.

Always find the rhyming of collar and dollar weirdly satisfying!

look at how seamlessly they transitioned from “we must evaluate Arday’s life and work no matter the motives of his critics” to the opposite position: defending Cofnas because of his critics’ motivations, no matter the quality of his work

Maybe they think its like a modern equivalent of appointing a minister for drought in 76?

Feels like they don't like the views they've been genteely nudging forward all this time being expressed openly.

2/ Why is there a reluctance to engage with the possibility that the main selling point for many voters when it comes to a racist & immoral candidate or party, is the racism & immorality? What if their concerns include views hostile to democracy & certain ethnic & religious groups in Britain?

Is this her earworm jingle?

*caterpillar