US China pact appears unlikely

Scholar power: 15.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Will Jennings	21%	51	15.0%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

49.0%

2.5 h

3

15.0%

Ranking score

0.083

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Matthew Facciani

@matthewfacciani.bsky.social

New global polling finds that people are much more likely to say AI will increase than decrease the gap between the rich and poor.
In the United States, 46% say AI will increase economic inequality, compared with just 5% who say it will decrease it.

September 23, 2026 at 2:36 PM

Reposted by Fabián Muniesa, Michael Larkin

4%

Scholar power: 4.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Fabián Muniesa	8%	34	4.7%
🎓 Michael Larkin	-	36	-
Total			4.7%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

4.1 h

47

4.7%

Ranking score

0.076

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Emily M. Bender

@emilymbender.bsky.social

There seems to be a coordinated talking point among the EA folks that the "standard" approach to "AI" on "the Left" is "AI is just stochastic parrots so no need to worry about it".

(Sorry for all the scare quotes, but y'know)

>>

September 23, 2026 at 1:03 PM

by Thiemo Fetzer

13%

Scholar power: 13.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Thiemo Fetzer	9%	24	13.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

4.3 h

0

13.2%

Ranking score

0.025

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Thiemo Fetzer 🇪🇺🇺🇦 - same handle elsewhere

@trfetzer.com

I was able to start us off and discussed some synthesis of work across projects to offer a high-dimensional read of the redefinition of informational boundaries in the world of AI with a specific focus on geopolitics.

September 23, 2026 at 12:51 PM

Reposted by Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò, Laurent Dubois

6%

Scholar power: 6.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò	11%	18	4.7%
🎓 Laurent Dubois	5%	13	1.8%
Total			6.5%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

4.4 h

36

6.5%

Ranking score

0.038

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Kevin Elliott

@kjephd.bsky.social

AI is the Gyges' ring of student work: it offers perfect concealment of wrongdoing.

If Glaucon is right, then everyone will use it to do injustice (cheat), & will be wise to do so.

If Socrates/Plato is right, then doing so also harms the wrong-doer, whose soul will be malformed into misery by it.

September 23, 2026 at 12:43 PM

by Alicia Garcı́a-Herrero

3%

Scholar power: 3.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Alicia Garcı́a-Herrero	2%	35	3.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

56.0%

6.2 h

0

3.5%

Ranking score

0.022

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Alicia Garcia Herrero 艾西亞

@aligarciaherrero.bsky.social

China knows the US needs a break – but not China, so Xi does not want to bring its AI team. It is quite, quite clear to me.

www.scmp.com/economy/glob...

Why China’s top AI pioneers are expected to miss this week’s Xi-Trump summit

Beijing has not officially announced details of the delegation, but the leaders of DeepSeek and Moonshot AI are absent from the reported list.

www.scmp.com

September 23, 2026 at 10:52 AM

by Alicia Garcı́a-Herrero

3%

Scholar power: 3.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Alicia Garcı́a-Herrero	2%	35	3.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

52.0%

6.2 h

0

3.5%

Ranking score

0.018

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Alicia Garcia Herrero 艾西亞

@aligarciaherrero.bsky.social

Views for @scmpnews.bsky.social: The potential absence of Chinese AI players is linked to differences in their respective domestic environments. Washington was facing growing domestic opposition and political pressure over the rapid development of the technology.

September 23, 2026 at 10:52 AM

by Harvey J. Miller

36%

Scholar power: 36.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Harvey J. Miller	17%	50	36.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

6.8 h

1

36.1%

Ranking score

0.053

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Harvey J. Miller

@mobileharv.bsky.social

@jamellebouie.net draws appropriate parallels between AI in the 21st century and railroads in the 19th: “If A.I. promises to transform the entire society, then the entire society is entitled to have a say, even a decisive one, over the use, development and direction of the technology.”

Opinion | New Matrix, Meet the Old Matrix (Gift Article)

The railroads were once the octopus that A.I. is now.

www.nytimes.com

September 23, 2026 at 10:21 AM

by Mariana Mazzucato

8%

Scholar power: 8.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Mariana Mazzucato	4%	46	8.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

7.1 h

9

8.1%

Ranking score

0.015

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Mariana Mazzucato

@mazzucatom.bsky.social

Join us for the launch of "The Rulers: Corporate Power in the Age of AI and the Cloud" by Cecilia Rikap: if we're serious about an innovation economy that delivers public value over extraction, we have to confront who actually rules it.

September 23, 2026 at 10:01 AM

by Adrian Vickers

20%

Scholar power: 20.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Adrian Vickers	15%	20	20.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

7.8 h

1

20.1%

Ranking score

0.024

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Adrian Vickers

@avick.bsky.social

AI I reckon. Should we have a vote?

September 23, 2026 at 9:21 AM

The Washington Post

AI leaders say U.S. and China need a deal. That probably won’t happen.

Industry leaders have called for coordination between the global powers on AI, but a lack of trust and internal divisions make agreement unlikely.

Reposts 0 8h

Project Syndicate

Technological Leapfrogging in the AI Age

Across Africa, past success stories have led policymakers to believe that developing economies can usually bypass the arduous, expensive stages of infrastructure development by adopting technologies built elsewhere. But this approach deserves more scrutiny, especially when applied to imported AI systems.

Reposts 0 8h

by Thom Brooks

17%

Scholar power: 17.8%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Thom Brooks	14%	18	17.8%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

8.8 h

0

17.8%

Ranking score

0.027

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Thom Brooks

@thombrooks.bsky.social

Prime Minister Andy Burnham is right to call for work towards a set of global principles and standards to “ensure that AI development is safe” - time for all to come together and address this major challenge.

September 23, 2026 at 8:18 AM

by Jonathan Wolff

25%

Scholar power: 25.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Jonathan Wolff	15%	33	25.9%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

12.3 h

4

25.9%

Ranking score

0.024

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Jo Wolff

@jowolff.bsky.social

It’s as if Trump never read Orwell’s 1984. Oh, hold on …

www.bbc.com/news/article...

Will Trump's AI rebrand to 'super intelligence' catch on?

Some people close to the president have started to use the term but experts say it is unlikely to catch on.

www.bbc.com

September 23, 2026 at 4:46 AM

Politiken

Britain will lead the development of AI standards

Britain will use its G20 presidency to secure a common set of principles and standards for AI.

Reposts 0 12h

Reposted by Peter Thorne

4%

Scholar power: 4%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Peter Thorne	-	57	-

Ersatz Doctor

@ersatzdoctor.bsky.social

The cool thing about AI is that it finally ended that annoying trend where electronics got less expensive year after year.

September 23, 2026 at 4:00 AM

by Christopher Wright

13%

Scholar power: 13.8%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Christopher Wright	7%	43	13.8%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

13.5 h

0

13.8%

Ranking score

0.01

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Christopher Wright

@chriswrightau.bsky.social

Nice reality check on the AI hype and why the techbros promote this BS: www.technologyreview.com/2026/09/22/1...

Don’t be fooled by this summer of AI hype

Breathless claims about AGI and new capabilities fall apart pretty quickly under scrutiny.

www.technologyreview.com

September 23, 2026 at 3:39 AM

by Ernesto Castañeda

14%

Scholar power: 14.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Ernesto Castañeda	12%	16	14.4%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

15.0 h

1

14.4%

Ranking score

0.008

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Ernesto Castañeda

@drernestocast.bsky.social

Amidst growing concerns over AI's environmental impact and potential rogue behavior, Trump signals a shift towards prioritizing AI expansion while acknowledging the need for oversight of 'bad actors.' This comes as engineers and CEOs call for a slowdown, fearing loss of control over the technology.

September 23, 2026 at 2:04 AM

by Jeffrey Sonnenfeld

9%

Scholar power: 9.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 33%, Political science 25%, Law 17%, Business 13%, Sociology 12%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Jeffrey Sonnenfeld	6%	27	9.4%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

16.5 h

0

9.4%

Ranking score

0.006

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Jeffrey Sonnenfeld

@jeffsonnenfeld.bsky.social

In @fortune.com - The backwards AI pacing debate & how far business is from the frontier - DC & Silicon Valley have found a new fight over AI in pacing...Corporate USA is yrs behind the AI frontier & labs’ fortunes will be decided by trust & adoption, not raw capability.
fortune.com/2026/09/22/a...