Greens define Zionism as racism
5h
British Green MP Ellie Chowns called for safeguards against extremist and racist influence after members approved a motion defining Zionism as racism, opposed by four of the party’s five MPs.
Reposted by Ruud Koopmans, Lucinda Platt, Ben H. Ansell , and 2 more Ruud Koopmans, Lucinda Platt, Ben H. Ansell, Geoffrey M. Hodgson, Sara Hirschhorn
85%
Scholar power: 85.0%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Ruud Koopmans | 47% | 50 | 33.2% |
| 🎓 Lucinda Platt | 31% | 37 | 18.9% |
| 🎓 Ben H. Ansell | 33% | 22 | 15.5% |
| 🎓 Geoffrey M. Hodgson | 12% | 72 | 10.2% |
| 🎓 Sara Hirschhorn | 42% | 3 | 7.3% |
| Total | 85.0% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
56.0%
27.7 h
1629
85.0%
Ranking score
0.628
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
93%
Scholar power: 93.5%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Matthew Goodwin | 56% | 31 | 93.5% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
45.0%
6.4 h
18
93.5%
Ranking score
0.387
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
66%
Scholar power: 66.1%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Madawi Al‐Rasheed | 47% | 22 | 66.1% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
64.0%
25.4 h
0
66.1%
Ranking score
0.115
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Alex Callinicos
20%
Scholar power: 20.1%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Alex Callinicos | 35% | 33 | 20.1% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
59.0%
10.2 h
17
20.1%
Ranking score
0.095
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Matthew Søberg Shugart
36%
Scholar power: 36.7%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Matthew Søberg Shugart | 56% | 43 | 36.7% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
55.0%
24.1 h
51
36.7%
Ranking score
0.09
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Tariq Modood
28%
Scholar power: 28.7%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Tariq Modood | 38% | 57 | 28.7% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
46.0%
29.1 h
556
28.7%
Ranking score
0.076
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Patrick Dunleavy
35%
Scholar power: 35.9%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Patrick Dunleavy | 53% | 46 | 35.9% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
52.0%
18.7 h
19
35.9%
Ranking score
0.071
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Alex Callinicos
20%
Scholar power: 20.1%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Alex Callinicos | 35% | 33 | 20.1% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
54.0%
14.0 h
18
20.1%
Ranking score
0.055
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
by Alan Sked
44%
Scholar power: 44.8%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Alan Sked | 45% | 11 | 44.8% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
57.0%
25.3 h
0
44.8%
Ranking score
0.046
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Geoffrey M. Hodgson
10%
Scholar power: 10.2%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Geoffrey M. Hodgson | 12% | 72 | 10.2% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
55.0%
29.4 h
305
10.2%
Ranking score
0.037
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Geoffrey M. Hodgson
10%
Scholar power: 10.2%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Geoffrey M. Hodgson | 12% | 72 | 10.2% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
60.0%
28.4 h
97
10.2%
Ranking score
0.034
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
by Judea Pearl
3%
Scholar power: 3.0%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Judea Pearl | 1% | 98 | 3.0% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
61.0%
20.4 h
1
3.0%
Ranking score
0.029
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Geoffrey M. Hodgson
10%
Scholar power: 10.2%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Geoffrey M. Hodgson | 12% | 72 | 10.2% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
58.0%
30.4 h
95
10.2%
Ranking score
0.029
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Geoffrey M. Hodgson
10%
Scholar power: 10.2%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Geoffrey M. Hodgson | 12% | 72 | 10.2% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
58.0%
31.0 h
84
10.2%
Ranking score
0.027
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
by Mark Edele
48%
Scholar power: 48.7%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Mark Edele | 45% | 13 | 48.7% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
47.0%
21.9 h
0
48.7%
Ranking score
0.023
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
The Greens — completely unelectable. “Shoebridge’s stated policy of giving Ukraine military support only if it was backed by the United Nations Security Council is, given the obvious fact that Russia as a permanent member would veto it, a ridiculous policy.”
www.theage.com.au/politics/fed...
www.theage.com.au/politics/fed...
Extremism is all the rage. But there’s a moment that will truly test Shoebridge and Hanson
You don’t need to peer too far back into the past to be reminded how public sentiment can rearrange itself once an election is called.
www.theage.com.au
October 9, 2026 at 9:44 PM
The Greens — completely unelectable. “Shoebridge’s stated policy of giving Ukraine military support only if it was backed by the United Nations Security Council is, given the obvious fact that Russia as a permanent member would veto it, a ridiculous policy.”
www.theage.com.au/politics/fed...
www.theage.com.au/politics/fed...
Reposted by Randy E. Barnett
15%
Scholar power: 15.8%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Randy E. Barnett | 33% | 23 | 15.8% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
51.0%
31.0 h
36
15.8%
Ranking score
0.022
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
21%
Scholar power: 21.8%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Sara Hirschhorn | 42% | 3 | 21.8% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
56.0%
27.2 h
0
21.8%
Ranking score
0.014
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
39%
Scholar power: 39.7%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 David Bartram | 27% | 24 | 39.7% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
47.0%
29.4 h
0
39.7%
Ranking score
0.014
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Polanski said he couldn't focus on the "Zionism is racism" motion b/c he had to focus on campaigning.
But in abdicating his leadership role he undermined his Holborn prospects *and* his claim on the leadership role.
I don't think this guy is meant for politics.
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
But in abdicating his leadership role he undermined his Holborn prospects *and* his claim on the leadership role.
I don't think this guy is meant for politics.
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Leader of Jewish Greens calls for Zack Polanski to resign after byelection loss
Vivien Lichtenstein urges party leader to quit over ‘Zionism is racism’ policy – but could face no-confidence motion herself
www.theguardian.com
October 9, 2026 at 2:15 PM
Polanski said he couldn't focus on the "Zionism is racism" motion b/c he had to focus on campaigning.
But in abdicating his leadership role he undermined his Holborn prospects *and* his claim on the leadership role.
I don't think this guy is meant for politics.
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
But in abdicating his leadership role he undermined his Holborn prospects *and* his claim on the leadership role.
I don't think this guy is meant for politics.
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
41%
Scholar power: 41.6%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Eugene Kontorovich | 40% | 12 | 41.6% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
45.0%
31.0 h
0
41.6%
Ranking score
0.012
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
30%
Scholar power: 30.0%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 50%, Sociology 28%, History 22%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Jonathan Portes | 25% | 16 | 30.0% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
47.0%
28.8 h
0
30.0%
Ranking score
0.011
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
but that's not really the issue here on UK bluesky is it? Who's saying "it isn't genocide anyway"? Nobody in the replies to me.
October 9, 2026 at 2:52 PM
but that's not really the issue here on UK bluesky is it? Who's saying "it isn't genocide anyway"? Nobody in the replies to me.