Topic
Technology UK US

Microsoft urges global AI rules

17m

Microsoft President Brad Smith called for globally coordinated AI rules, including independent safety reviews and emergency shutdown switches, saying the technology is less regulated than household goods.

Reposted by Paul M. Schwartz

7%
“AI Governance Workshop” — Join us at the Privacy + Security Forum (Nov. 4–6, 2026) for an in-depth discussion. Register here: bit.ly/3wnJU9h #PrivacyLaw #Cybersecurity #PrivSecForum
October 12, 2026 at 7:03 PM
0%
What used to be a premier, *independent* federal agency.
AIP FYI reports that the executive order renaming artificial intelligence will be applied at the grant level as well, though not retrospectively.
October 12, 2026 at 6:07 PM
The Guardian
When AI is subject to less regulation than your fridge, something is startlingly wrong | Richard Hermer

Let’s be clear: the risk to humanity is unprecedented. Without an urgent public debate and robust use of international law, we will lose control of the future In my two years as attorney general, I spent more time working on national security than any other issue. The range and gravity of the threats posed to our nation are multifold, from terrorism, armed conflicts and nuclear proliferation, to the impacts of financial insecurity and the climate crisis. All profound challenges, yet ones our superb intelligence and defence communities are well placed to counter. The risk from AI is of an altogether different magnitude, not only in scale, but also because there is a limited time window to address it. The risk is difficult to overestimate: it poses an existential risk to humanity. The lights are flashing red and we must act now before it’s too late. Although the extraordinary threats posed by AI have long been flagged by those closely involved in its creation, it was not until very recently, after the disclosure of the Hugging Face hack and the resignation of Jacob Coxon from Anthropic , that the issue at last started to gain traction in the public discourse. This moment is an opportunity, and to capitalise on it we desperately need increased urgency in international coordination to regulate frontier AI. There must also be meaningful public engagement with how AI should be shaped to benefit humanity, rather than entrench the power of a few. We cannot leave this to China, the US and big tech - we must all demand a voice in the debate. Continue reading. . .

When AI is subject to less regulation than your fridge, something is startlingly wrong | Richard Hermer
Reposts 5 3h
24%
Here are some more details from the proposal (doi.org/10.1007/s133...), designed to avoid this problem. Just as we may not want to permit an uninsured corporation (or one financially unable to meet its obligations) to take on high-stakes projects, the regulatory principle for AI should be similar.
October 12, 2026 at 3:50 PM

Reposted by Arvind Narayanan

32%
12%
24%
It may sometimes be appropriate to introduce regimes of strict liability for the operation of AI systems. The required insurance costs might then (ideally) incentivise greater AI safety. Of course, all this is very tricky. But there are lessons to be learnt from the case of corporate regulation. 3/3
October 12, 2026 at 2:14 PM
24%
The basic proposal (albeit tricky): regulation should permit the use of autonomous AI in high-stakes settings only if structures are in place to ensure that those systems – or if infeasible, their legal representatives – bear responsibility (backed via proper insurance) for the systems’ actions. 2/3
October 12, 2026 at 2:14 PM
24%
This NYT piece aptly raises the issue of *responsibility gaps* arising from the use of AI systems. In the paper below, I compare such responsibility gaps with those arising in the more widely studied case of corporate entities and discuss possible regulatory responses via liability arrangements.
Group Agency and Artificial Intelligence - Philosophy & Technology
The aim of this exploratory paper is to review an under-appreciated parallel between group agency and artificial intelligence. As both phenomena involve non-human goal-directed agents that can make a ...
link.springer.com
October 12, 2026 at 1:54 PM

Reposted by Aric Rindfleisch

3%
1%
Sharing my podcast on in the series of Zhonghua Mundus by @bruegel.org. In this episode, we discussed #China's approach to #AI governance and what it means for US-China coordination, AI safety and Europe's role with the host Yuyun Zhan and the guest Kristy Loke.

www.bruegel.org/podcast/chin...
China's AI governance playbook
China's approach to AI governance and what it means for US-China coordination, AI safety and Europe's role
www.bruegel.org
October 12, 2026 at 11:05 AM

Reposted by Brigitte Nerlich

0%
"Brad Smith said there needed to be global safety rules in place, including a legal obligation to tell a "victim" if their system is breached by a rogue AI agent as well as deciding when outside evaluators should sign off on an AI product before it is released." www.bbc.com/news/article...
AI is less regulated than milk, Microsoft president says
Brad Smith calls for global rules on AI, and says the UK is in the "best position" to lead the charge.
www.bbc.com
October 12, 2026 at 10:52 AM