AI safeguards lag potential risks
6h
European academics and commentators warned that regulatory safeguards for advanced artificial intelligence lag its potential risks, renewing calls for stronger limits on development.
Write your reply
33%
Scholar power: 33.3%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 John Tasioulas | 21% | 28 | 33.3% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
57.0%
16.8 h
1
33.3%
Ranking score
0.052
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Trudy Harpham
1%
Scholar power: 1.9%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Trudy Harpham | 3% | 40 | 1.9% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
52.0%
20.5 h
2600
1.9%
Ranking score
0.041
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
31%
Scholar power: 31.9%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Michael C. Horowitz | 18% | 35 | 31.9% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
57.0%
22.0 h
1
31.9%
Ranking score
0.035
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
19%
Scholar power: 19.5%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Oona A. Hathaway | 13% | 25 | 19.5% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
49.0%
25.6 h
26
19.5%
Ranking score
0.034
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Rebecca Tushnet
7%
Scholar power: 7.5%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Rebecca Tushnet | 20% | 14 | 7.5% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
47.0%
24.8 h
520
7.5%
Ranking score
0.031
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Google is now threatening America's schools, saying they will turn off their core search functions if schools choose to entirely block AI.
www.nytimes.com/2026/11/03/u...
www.nytimes.com/2026/11/03/u...
Google Will Turn Off Search for Schools That Reject A.I. (Gift Article)
Google is making it easier to restrict its A.I. tools for students. But schools that block A.I. entirely will lose student access to Google’s search engine.
www.nytimes.com
November 3, 2026 at 3:08 PM
Google is now threatening America's schools, saying they will turn off their core search functions if schools choose to entirely block AI.
www.nytimes.com/2026/11/03/u...
www.nytimes.com/2026/11/03/u...
Reposted by Mohan J. Dutta
3%
Scholar power: 3.6%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Mohan J. Dutta | 5% | 52 | 3.6% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
53.0%
23.7 h
442
3.6%
Ranking score
0.023
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
by Brian Leiter
33%
Scholar power: 33.3%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Brian Leiter | 18% | 38 | 33.3% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
46.0%
24.0 h
2
33.3%
Ranking score
0.021
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Dean Baker
0%
Scholar power: 0.9%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Dean Baker | 2% | 21 | 0.9% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
46.0%
21.8 h
2478
0.9%
Ranking score
0.018
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
27%
Scholar power: 27.2%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose | 10% | 82 | 27.2% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
51.0%
25.5 h
0
27.2%
Ranking score
0.017
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
16%
Scholar power: 16.0%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 David McKenzie | 6% | 79 | 16.0% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
46.0%
24.2 h
0
16.0%
Ranking score
0.008
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Zerina Lokmic‐Tomkins
0%
Scholar power: 0.5%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Zerina Lokmic‐Tomkins | 1% | 22 | 0.5% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
52.0%
26.7 h
33
0.5%
Ranking score
0.005
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
There is still an air of uncomprehending confusion in tech (and frankly, even in some climate / energy spaces) around why people do not like AI
www.choice.com.au/data-protect...
www.choice.com.au/data-protect...
November 3, 2026 at 1:16 PM
There is still an air of uncomprehending confusion in tech (and frankly, even in some climate / energy spaces) around why people do not like AI
www.choice.com.au/data-protect...
www.choice.com.au/data-protect...
Reposted by Roger A. Pielke
0%
Scholar power: 0.0%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Roger A. Pielke | 0% | 95 | 0.0% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
49.0%
18.3 h
1
0.0%
Ranking score
0.004
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
by Paul Dorfman
2%
Scholar power: 2.2%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Paul Dorfman | 3% | 6 | 2.2% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
48.0%
29.7 h
6
2.2%
Ranking score
0.003
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Christian Catalini
2%
Scholar power: 2.6%
Story's scientific field profile
Law 33%, Computer science 29%, Political science 29%, Philosophy 9%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Christian Catalini | 5% | 27 | 2.6% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
49.0%
21.1 h
0
2.6%
Ranking score
0.002
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3