Voters fret over costs, corruption
9h
U.S. voters cited living costs and government corruption as crucial concerns in congressional midterm elections, with nearly half naming living costs their top issue, an AP poll found.
Write your reply
88%
Scholar power: 88.2%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Michael McFaul | 49% | 36 | 88.2% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
59.0%
17.4 h
167
88.2%
Ranking score
1.239
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
by Pippa Norris
117%
Scholar power: 117.0%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Pippa Norris | 40% | 95 | 117.0% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
47.0%
16.2 h
13
117.0%
Ranking score
0.407
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
by Ian Bremmer
59%
Scholar power: 59.0%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Ian Bremmer | 41% | 23 | 59.0% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
48.0%
16.9 h
87
59.0%
Ranking score
0.362
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
52%
Scholar power: 52.4%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 John Tasioulas | 33% | 28 | 52.4% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
48.0%
11.5 h
0
52.4%
Ranking score
0.288
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Adam Bonica
12%
Scholar power: 12.5%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Adam Bonica | 25% | 25 | 12.5% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
53.0%
19.2 h
460
12.5%
Ranking score
0.142
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Holy shit. 90% say corruption was a major or crucial factor in their vote. 90%! Nothing polls at 90%. Tell me this is all about gas prices.
November 4, 2026 at 12:33 AM
Holy shit. 90% say corruption was a major or crucial factor in their vote. 90%! Nothing polls at 90%. Tell me this is all about gas prices.
Reposted by Adrian Vermeule
21%
Scholar power: 21.5%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Adrian Vermeule | 34% | 40 | 21.5% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
47.0%
25.1 h
440
21.5%
Ranking score
0.107
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Randy E. Barnett
17%
Scholar power: 17.7%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Randy E. Barnett | 37% | 23 | 17.7% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
47.0%
25.5 h
251
17.7%
Ranking score
0.073
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
29%
Scholar power: 29.4%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Newt Gingrich | 31% | 10 | 29.4% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
45.0%
22.0 h
18
29.4%
Ranking score
0.053
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
6%
Scholar power: 6.5%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Elizabeth Warren | 4% | 29 | 6.5% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
53.0%
28.9 h
535
6.5%
Ranking score
0.049
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
45%
Scholar power: 45.8%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Matt Grossmann | 37% | 17 | 45.8% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
46.0%
27.9 h
1
45.8%
Ranking score
0.037
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
29%
Scholar power: 29.4%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Newt Gingrich | 31% | 10 | 29.4% |
Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
48.0%
25.6 h
17
29.4%
Ranking score
0.049
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by John G. McNutt
9%
Scholar power: 9.2%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 John G. McNutt | 21% | 19 | 9.2% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
55.0%
24.1 h
10
9.2%
Ranking score
0.022
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Douglas Holtz‐Eakin
21%
Scholar power: 21.9%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Douglas Holtz‐Eakin | 33% | 44 | 21.9% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
50.0%
24.8 h
1
21.9%
Ranking score
0.017
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3
Reposted by Elizabeth Warren
2%
Scholar power: 2.2%
Story's scientific field profile
Political science 55%, Economics 45%
| Name | Field match | H-index | Scholar power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎓 Elizabeth Warren | 4% | 29 | 2.2% |
Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index
Ranking score inputs
Relevance
Recency
Reposts
Scholar power
59.0%
26.2 h
17
2.2%
Ranking score
0.008
Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3