🫡 CDR Kelly
I bought a Tesla because it was fast like a rocket ship. But now every time I drive it, I feel like a rolling billboard for a man dismantling our government and hurting people. So Tesla, you’re fired!
New ride coming soon.
New ride coming soon.
March 15, 2025 at 1:27 AM
🫡 CDR Kelly
🧵CO₂ removal (CDR) is back in the news, but just because the UNEP report says we need CDR, it doesn't mean we'll have CDR. Many challenges will take decades of research and negotiation to solve. Here are some examples:
Technological: We currently don't have any durable CDR method that scales.
Technological: We currently don't have any durable CDR method that scales.
September 8, 2026 at 12:54 PM
🧵CO₂ removal (CDR) is back in the news, but just because the UNEP report says we need CDR, it doesn't mean we'll have CDR. Many challenges will take decades of research and negotiation to solve. Here are some examples:
Technological: We currently don't have any durable CDR method that scales.
Technological: We currently don't have any durable CDR method that scales.
Some people say, "Alongside rapid and drastic decarbonization, carbon dioxide removal (CDR) will be needed to meet climate goals."
I say no! Unless we decarbonize drastically, CDR will be useless.
So we say, "AFTER rapid and drastic decarbonization, CDR will be needed to meet climate goals."
I say no! Unless we decarbonize drastically, CDR will be useless.
So we say, "AFTER rapid and drastic decarbonization, CDR will be needed to meet climate goals."
March 3, 2025 at 10:50 AM
Some people say, "Alongside rapid and drastic decarbonization, carbon dioxide removal (CDR) will be needed to meet climate goals."
I say no! Unless we decarbonize drastically, CDR will be useless.
So we say, "AFTER rapid and drastic decarbonization, CDR will be needed to meet climate goals."
I say no! Unless we decarbonize drastically, CDR will be useless.
So we say, "AFTER rapid and drastic decarbonization, CDR will be needed to meet climate goals."
I often see it said that CO₂ removal (CDR) is needed ALONGSIDE drastic emissions reductions to reach net zero. I think this is incorrect. I think CDR is needed AFTER drastic emissions reductions. The distinction is important as it specifies when we use renewable energy to deploy CDR at scale.
June 23, 2025 at 12:19 AM
I often see it said that CO₂ removal (CDR) is needed ALONGSIDE drastic emissions reductions to reach net zero. I think this is incorrect. I think CDR is needed AFTER drastic emissions reductions. The distinction is important as it specifies when we use renewable energy to deploy CDR at scale.
It’s not: if we don’t decarbonize fast enough, we’ll need more CO₂ removal (CDR).
It’s: If we don’t decarbonize fast enough, we’re screwed.
CDR is useless unless we decarbonize drastically.
CDR is for residual and legacy emissions, not luxury removal.
It’s: If we don’t decarbonize fast enough, we’re screwed.
CDR is useless unless we decarbonize drastically.
CDR is for residual and legacy emissions, not luxury removal.
October 10, 2024 at 11:58 AM
It’s not: if we don’t decarbonize fast enough, we’ll need more CO₂ removal (CDR).
It’s: If we don’t decarbonize fast enough, we’re screwed.
CDR is useless unless we decarbonize drastically.
CDR is for residual and legacy emissions, not luxury removal.
It’s: If we don’t decarbonize fast enough, we’re screwed.
CDR is useless unless we decarbonize drastically.
CDR is for residual and legacy emissions, not luxury removal.
Javier Negre tenía el mismo problema de déficit atencional hace 10 años.
Cuando era colaborador de Espejo Público confundió los CDR de Túnez contra la dictadura con los CDR de Cataluña.
Sigue siendo un amante del ridículo personal.
Cuando era colaborador de Espejo Público confundió los CDR de Túnez contra la dictadura con los CDR de Cataluña.
Sigue siendo un amante del ridículo personal.
January 27, 2026 at 7:34 PM
Javier Negre tenía el mismo problema de déficit atencional hace 10 años.
Cuando era colaborador de Espejo Público confundió los CDR de Túnez contra la dictadura con los CDR de Cataluña.
Sigue siendo un amante del ridículo personal.
Cuando era colaborador de Espejo Público confundió los CDR de Túnez contra la dictadura con los CDR de Cataluña.
Sigue siendo un amante del ridículo personal.
Update- CDR Maguire and CDR Health, 11740 SW 80th street, #102, Miami FL 33183, phone 786 235 8534
July 11, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Update- CDR Maguire and CDR Health, 11740 SW 80th street, #102, Miami FL 33183, phone 786 235 8534
Yes this is GTA3 Running on a burned CDR on my Sega Dreamcast
December 30, 2024 at 5:42 PM
Yes this is GTA3 Running on a burned CDR on my Sega Dreamcast
📌 CDR Maguire/CDR Health: Carlos Duart has donated hundreds of thousands to DeSantis and GOP PACs
📌 Gothams LLC, IRG, ARS: Major state contracts, major contributions
📌 GardaWorld: Private security firm tied to detention logistics
📌 Gothams LLC, IRG, ARS: Major state contracts, major contributions
📌 GardaWorld: Private security firm tied to detention logistics
July 8, 2025 at 3:49 AM
📌 CDR Maguire/CDR Health: Carlos Duart has donated hundreds of thousands to DeSantis and GOP PACs
📌 Gothams LLC, IRG, ARS: Major state contracts, major contributions
📌 GardaWorld: Private security firm tied to detention logistics
📌 Gothams LLC, IRG, ARS: Major state contracts, major contributions
📌 GardaWorld: Private security firm tied to detention logistics
It’s not: if we don’t decarbonize fast enough, we’ll need more CO₂ removal (CDR).
It’s: If we don’t decarbonize fast enough, we’re screwed.
CDR is useless unless we decarbonize drastically.
CDR is for residual emissions, not luxury removal.
It’s: If we don’t decarbonize fast enough, we’re screwed.
CDR is useless unless we decarbonize drastically.
CDR is for residual emissions, not luxury removal.
February 11, 2024 at 9:13 PM
It’s not: if we don’t decarbonize fast enough, we’ll need more CO₂ removal (CDR).
It’s: If we don’t decarbonize fast enough, we’re screwed.
CDR is useless unless we decarbonize drastically.
CDR is for residual emissions, not luxury removal.
It’s: If we don’t decarbonize fast enough, we’re screwed.
CDR is useless unless we decarbonize drastically.
CDR is for residual emissions, not luxury removal.
December 15, 2025 at 7:38 AM
The same for CO₂ removal (CDR)
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "My view here is it has always been very strange that this technology is being built by a private company ... I think the government and the public needs to have a stake. And that's why we've supported regulation."
September 13, 2026 at 11:10 PM
The same for CO₂ removal (CDR)
I love trees but they're not durable CDR.
every time carbon removal gets posted about there's a certain "we have trees at home" genre of response. which I get, on some level, because the forces of fossil capital are indeed that comically evil and dishonest.
but: 1) actual scientists also research these things 2) they thought of that
but: 1) actual scientists also research these things 2) they thought of that
September 8, 2026 at 5:39 PM
I love trees but they're not durable CDR.
requirements changed after CDR
In honor of spooky month, share a 4 word horror story that only someone in your profession would understand
I'll go first: Six page commercial lease.
I'll go first: Six page commercial lease.
October 13, 2025 at 5:15 PM
requirements changed after CDR
CO₂ removal (CDR) deployments require materials and energy, which emit CO₂. That’s why we talk about net CDR.
Even if CDR affects ecosystems, it’s likely minor compared to the significant negatively impacts of climate change on ecosystems. So should we think about net ecosystem benefits of CDR?
Even if CDR affects ecosystems, it’s likely minor compared to the significant negatively impacts of climate change on ecosystems. So should we think about net ecosystem benefits of CDR?
May 27, 2025 at 1:28 PM
CO₂ removal (CDR) deployments require materials and energy, which emit CO₂. That’s why we talk about net CDR.
Even if CDR affects ecosystems, it’s likely minor compared to the significant negatively impacts of climate change on ecosystems. So should we think about net ecosystem benefits of CDR?
Even if CDR affects ecosystems, it’s likely minor compared to the significant negatively impacts of climate change on ecosystems. So should we think about net ecosystem benefits of CDR?
It me!
UH oceanographer selected as lead author of IPCC report on CO2 removal approaches
SOEST oceanography professor David Ho was selected as a lead author for the 2027 IPCC Methodology Report on carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS)
www.soest.hawaii.edu
April 23, 2026 at 1:03 AM
It me!
CDR (Cheveux de riche)
August 1, 2025 at 10:11 AM
CDR (Cheveux de riche)
Here's the difference between CCS and CDR.
I see that a lot of people still need to look at this infographic about the difference between carbon removal (CDR) and carbon capture (CCS).
carbon180.org/blog/the-dif...
carbon180.org/blog/the-dif...
January 15, 2025 at 9:52 PM
Here's the difference between CCS and CDR.
About 90% of CO₂ removal (CDR) credits were bought by Microsoft in 2025. People have different ideas about how to scale CDR, but I don't think CDR will ever go anywhere unless the R&D is funded and led by governments.
After a Slow 2025, Where Does Carbon Removal Go From Here?
Microsoft dominated this year.
heatmap.news
December 26, 2025 at 6:00 PM
About 90% of CO₂ removal (CDR) credits were bought by Microsoft in 2025. People have different ideas about how to scale CDR, but I don't think CDR will ever go anywhere unless the R&D is funded and led by governments.
It sounds obvious but I think I finally can articulate why I’m so uncomfortable with CDR people seeing their work as “energy tech” (BECCS aside, CDR doesn’t produce energy). Which is that it accepts CDR as a fossil emissions control tech, when CDR really shouldn’t be used that way.
December 13, 2024 at 7:56 PM
It sounds obvious but I think I finally can articulate why I’m so uncomfortable with CDR people seeing their work as “energy tech” (BECCS aside, CDR doesn’t produce energy). Which is that it accepts CDR as a fossil emissions control tech, when CDR really shouldn’t be used that way.
Will all the CDR boosters admit they were wrong?
May 15, 2025 at 10:39 PM
Will all the CDR boosters admit they were wrong?
Microsoft significantly reduced its CO₂ removal (CDR) purchases by 80% in the first half of 2026. Microsoft bought 93% of all CDR credits globally last year. This is absurd, and no way to determine which method might actually work and scale. CDR R&D should be government-funded and government-led.
Microsoft cuts purchases of carbon removals by 80% amid AI push
That puts Microsoft on track for its first retreat since 2023 from a market it entered in 2020.
www.seattletimes.com
August 15, 2026 at 5:04 AM
Microsoft significantly reduced its CO₂ removal (CDR) purchases by 80% in the first half of 2026. Microsoft bought 93% of all CDR credits globally last year. This is absurd, and no way to determine which method might actually work and scale. CDR R&D should be government-funded and government-led.
People who say we should have unlimited energy so we can do CO₂ removal (CDR) at a massive scale don’t understand that there are so many other factors that prevent scaling of CDR.
Among them are geophysical and environmental (land, water, resources, ecosystems), societal, financial, and governance.
Among them are geophysical and environmental (land, water, resources, ecosystems), societal, financial, and governance.
December 3, 2025 at 12:59 PM
People who say we should have unlimited energy so we can do CO₂ removal (CDR) at a massive scale don’t understand that there are so many other factors that prevent scaling of CDR.
Among them are geophysical and environmental (land, water, resources, ecosystems), societal, financial, and governance.
Among them are geophysical and environmental (land, water, resources, ecosystems), societal, financial, and governance.
Here's the difference between CCS and CDR. CCS is from a point source, and CDR is from the free atmosphere. When we're at net zero (ha!), only CDR can remove CO₂ from the atmosphere.
I see that a lot of people still need to look at this infographic about the difference between carbon removal (CDR) and carbon capture (CCS).
carbon180.org/blog/the-dif...
carbon180.org/blog/the-dif...
December 23, 2024 at 4:19 PM
Here's the difference between CCS and CDR. CCS is from a point source, and CDR is from the free atmosphere. When we're at net zero (ha!), only CDR can remove CO₂ from the atmosphere.