If it’s a value add for some users but not others then it should be implemented as opt-in.
And: in these days and times, who would trust a tech company to provide something out of sheer philanthropy?
If it’s a value add for some users but not others then it should be implemented as opt-in.
And: in these days and times, who would trust a tech company to provide something out of sheer philanthropy?
To me the issue here is that it was enabled by default instead of opt-in
I detest shit like this - they’re constantly reorganizing settings and moving shit around and deploying new opt-out garbage it makes for a bad user experience
To me the issue here is that it was enabled by default instead of opt-in
I detest shit like this - they’re constantly reorganizing settings and moving shit around and deploying new opt-out garbage it makes for a bad user experience
* Quiet hours
* Disclosure of how much money goes to candidates vs. fundraising costs
* Quiet hours
* Disclosure of how much money goes to candidates vs. fundraising costs
Yes. And economics-based (like the Remain campaign that lost). And looking to cut corners. And already looking ahead to opt-outs. And celebrating when an EU figure says we might get an opt-out.
Weak.
Yes. And economics-based (like the Remain campaign that lost). And looking to cut corners. And already looking ahead to opt-outs. And celebrating when an EU figure says we might get an opt-out.
Weak.
Link to the poll of economists here: kentclarkcenter.org/surveys/opti...
Link to the poll of economists here: kentclarkcenter.org/surveys/opti...
We were worried nobody would opt in so now it's on by default. You're welcome.
We were worried nobody would opt in so now it's on by default. You're welcome.
(Absurd answers only.)
Don’t worry, they’ll never see it. They’ll be ok.
And you can always opt out of hearing my shit. Go. Be free.
Don’t worry, they’ll never see it. They’ll be ok.
And you can always opt out of hearing my shit. Go. Be free.