I have since learned that Ms. Bumbleflower is a beast
February 28, 2026 at 12:17 AM
I have since learned that Ms. Bumbleflower is a beast
🚨 Warning This user is obsessed with Foo Fighters!!! (FF)
May 26, 2025 at 1:16 AM
🚨 Warning This user is obsessed with Foo Fighters!!! (FF)
September 18, 2026 at 3:49 PM
New SCI version dropped which now supports async/await in CLJS!
And new #nbbcljs dropped which uses the newest SCI. Demo:
$ npx nbb@1.4.206
Welcome to nbb v1.4.206!
user=> (defn ^:async foo [] (let [x (await (js/Promise.resolve 1))] (inc x)))
#'user/foo
user=> (foo)
#<Promise 2>
#clojure
And new #nbbcljs dropped which uses the newest SCI. Demo:
$ npx nbb@1.4.206
Welcome to nbb v1.4.206!
user=> (defn ^:async foo [] (let [x (await (js/Promise.resolve 1))] (inc x)))
#'user/foo
user=> (foo)
#<Promise 2>
#clojure
February 7, 2026 at 12:13 PM
New SCI version dropped which now supports async/await in CLJS!
And new #nbbcljs dropped which uses the newest SCI. Demo:
$ npx nbb@1.4.206
Welcome to nbb v1.4.206!
user=> (defn ^:async foo [] (let [x (await (js/Promise.resolve 1))] (inc x)))
#'user/foo
user=> (foo)
#<Promise 2>
#clojure
And new #nbbcljs dropped which uses the newest SCI. Demo:
$ npx nbb@1.4.206
Welcome to nbb v1.4.206!
user=> (defn ^:async foo [] (let [x (await (js/Promise.resolve 1))] (inc x)))
#'user/foo
user=> (foo)
#<Promise 2>
#clojure
I HAVE REGAINED ACCESS TO MY LAST.FM ACCOUNT FROM 2010. Take that, assholes who hacked me and changed my password.
It's my second account, created during my Foo Fighters phase. Destroy what bores you. www.last.fm/user/deslxtiks
It's my second account, created during my Foo Fighters phase. Destroy what bores you. www.last.fm/user/deslxtiks
October 24, 2024 at 10:04 PM
I HAVE REGAINED ACCESS TO MY LAST.FM ACCOUNT FROM 2010. Take that, assholes who hacked me and changed my password.
It's my second account, created during my Foo Fighters phase. Destroy what bores you. www.last.fm/user/deslxtiks
It's my second account, created during my Foo Fighters phase. Destroy what bores you. www.last.fm/user/deslxtiks
And he was addicted to “this is the user narrative, this is the story of using <foo> product” thing, which is *massive* if you want a thing to be usable.
April 20, 2024 at 8:50 PM
And he was addicted to “this is the user narrative, this is the story of using <foo> product” thing, which is *massive* if you want a thing to be usable.
It's so weird if you wanna do stuff like "chore(deps): Bump version of @foo/bar" because GitHub tries to convert it to a user tag lol
October 12, 2025 at 6:54 AM
It's so weird if you wanna do stuff like "chore(deps): Bump version of @foo/bar" because GitHub tries to convert it to a user tag lol
9. MUST NOT have install scripts (yeah sorry, the fight's over)
10. MUST clearly include a license, even if the license is "source available, not open source". This restriction MUST NOT limit to OSI's ridiculous list.
11. MUST have a name that is scoped to its publishing user/org (@foo/bar)
10. MUST clearly include a license, even if the license is "source available, not open source". This restriction MUST NOT limit to OSI's ridiculous list.
11. MUST have a name that is scoped to its publishing user/org (@foo/bar)
September 9, 2025 at 10:24 PM
9. MUST NOT have install scripts (yeah sorry, the fight's over)
10. MUST clearly include a license, even if the license is "source available, not open source". This restriction MUST NOT limit to OSI's ridiculous list.
11. MUST have a name that is scoped to its publishing user/org (@foo/bar)
10. MUST clearly include a license, even if the license is "source available, not open source". This restriction MUST NOT limit to OSI's ridiculous list.
11. MUST have a name that is scoped to its publishing user/org (@foo/bar)
i think a healthy thing to internalize as a man is that a lot of women are just the angry guy in the r crumb cartoon
![Two of the words the man correctly identified were
"colonel" and "regime", which, to one user, was evidence of a red flag: "he's obviously a Republican". (Maybe he just has an interest in military history, a time-honored hobby of boyfriends everywhere.) Regardless of political affiliation, it seemed fair game to dunk on Mr Foo-chia. One final quip from a viewer: "He'd be so upset if he could read these comments."
The test made its way around TikTok, with more young couples joining in, to similarly bleak results.
Even those men who did well got caught up in the pop-misandry circus. One man zipped through the list, ending with a perfect score and a self-satisfied grin. It was not the flex he might have hoped for.
"This is the barest fckn minimumest [sic] of bare minimums," one woman commented. "The men are being praised for literacy we're in hell," wrote another.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:smjq3vewiokoafh5k5vdjriv/bafkreibqw4iuaukbplwhev5hee7iu53zu4xpvvjflpfg2yu5q5ixojxbmq)
September 4, 2026 at 2:50 PM
i think a healthy thing to internalize as a man is that a lot of women are just the angry guy in the r crumb cartoon
I’d like user/hashtag combined, e.g., “Mute @foo on #bitcoin”
May 1, 2023 at 10:10 PM
I’d like user/hashtag combined, e.g., “Mute @foo on #bitcoin”
Just a Cat who loves to Draw Lewds!
🐾
furaffinity.net/user/fleet-foo…
🖌€
patreon.com/fleetfootrt
🐦
@FleetFootArt FOR NOW
€
fleetfootart.newgrounds.om
☕️
ko-fi.com/fleetfootart
✨ For Info on Commissions, Please go to my FA ✨
September 19, 2023 at 5:54 PM
Just a Cat who loves to Draw Lewds!
🐾
furaffinity.net/user/fleet-foo…
🖌€
patreon.com/fleetfootrt
🐦
@FleetFootArt FOR NOW
€
fleetfootart.newgrounds.om
☕️
ko-fi.com/fleetfootart
✨ For Info on Commissions, Please go to my FA ✨
📢 New publication 'Arbuscular #mycorrhizal colonization does not improve #root hydraulic supply in tomato and pea' by Jiacan Sun, Timothy Brodribb, Eloise Foo and Ibrahim Bourbia in Plant Physiology 🌱🧪
doi.org/10.1093/plph...
#drought
doi.org/10.1093/plph...
#drought
Validate User
doi.org
March 5, 2026 at 12:58 AM
📢 New publication 'Arbuscular #mycorrhizal colonization does not improve #root hydraulic supply in tomato and pea' by Jiacan Sun, Timothy Brodribb, Eloise Foo and Ibrahim Bourbia in Plant Physiology 🌱🧪
doi.org/10.1093/plph...
#drought
doi.org/10.1093/plph...
#drought
Yes, it namespaces all symbols (atoms in scheme/CL I think) at read time, so in namespace user with alias bar as b, `foo becomes user/foo and `b/heck becomes bar/heck. Then at evaluation time, these are resolved to vars or an error is thrown.
December 4, 2024 at 1:45 PM
Yes, it namespaces all symbols (atoms in scheme/CL I think) at read time, so in namespace user with alias bar as b, `foo becomes user/foo and `b/heck becomes bar/heck. Then at evaluation time, these are resolved to vars or an error is thrown.
Generally speaking, ancestor chains do not belong to public interfaces.
Say, if an instance of Foo::Bar provides method `foo`, generally speaking, whether the method comes from the class or a mixin is not a concern of the user. That, and the module constant, do not belong to the public contract.
Say, if an instance of Foo::Bar provides method `foo`, generally speaking, whether the method comes from the class or a mixin is not a concern of the user. That, and the module constant, do not belong to the public contract.
October 16, 2025 at 1:55 PM
Generally speaking, ancestor chains do not belong to public interfaces.
Say, if an instance of Foo::Bar provides method `foo`, generally speaking, whether the method comes from the class or a mixin is not a concern of the user. That, and the module constant, do not belong to the public contract.
Say, if an instance of Foo::Bar provides method `foo`, generally speaking, whether the method comes from the class or a mixin is not a concern of the user. That, and the module constant, do not belong to the public contract.
I made both. The egg foo yung was pretty good (I made a dipping sauce) but the fudge ended up pretty hard, which I freely admit may have been user error.
January 11, 2026 at 12:46 AM
I made both. The egg foo yung was pretty good (I made a dipping sauce) but the fudge ended up pretty hard, which I freely admit may have been user error.
✅ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K)…
🚫 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; OpenGraph…
✅ User-Agent: Foo
🚫 User-Agent: Slackbot…
🚫 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; OpenGraph…
✅ User-Agent: Foo
🚫 User-Agent: Slackbot…
October 25, 2024 at 4:19 PM
✅ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K)…
🚫 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; OpenGraph…
✅ User-Agent: Foo
🚫 User-Agent: Slackbot…
🚫 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; OpenGraph…
✅ User-Agent: Foo
🚫 User-Agent: Slackbot…
oh I can explain this: if you tell people which one, it makes it easier for attackers who are trying to guess logins and passwords
login: foo, password bar
"Your password is incorrect" -> now you know that foo is a value user name
login: foo, password bar
"Your password is incorrect" -> now you know that foo is a value user name
May 27, 2026 at 3:01 PM
oh I can explain this: if you tell people which one, it makes it easier for attackers who are trying to guess logins and passwords
login: foo, password bar
"Your password is incorrect" -> now you know that foo is a value user name
login: foo, password bar
"Your password is incorrect" -> now you know that foo is a value user name
“You have been added to starter pack titled Foo by user Bar. To remove yourself from the starter pack click here.”
October 18, 2024 at 4:43 PM
“You have been added to starter pack titled Foo by user Bar. To remove yourself from the starter pack click here.”
June 7, 2025 at 5:04 AM
Foo é meu user online desde sempre pq eu vi uma comic de pokemon onde o nome do gengar era foo e eu achei maneirissimo e starmage pq minha sona antiga era um bruxinho estelar intergaláctico
September 22, 2024 at 11:15 PM
Foo é meu user online desde sempre pq eu vi uma comic de pokemon onde o nome do gengar era foo e eu achei maneirissimo e starmage pq minha sona antiga era um bruxinho estelar intergaláctico
Frankly, I think it's ridiculous that you can even mark something as a sponsor segment that's less than 5 seconds, let alone a fraction of a second. If you can't physically say "this video is sponsored by foo" in that time, then it's obvious it was marked by a petty cunt. I say this as an avid user
January 17, 2025 at 11:10 PM
Frankly, I think it's ridiculous that you can even mark something as a sponsor segment that's less than 5 seconds, let alone a fraction of a second. If you can't physically say "this video is sponsored by foo" in that time, then it's obvious it was marked by a petty cunt. I say this as an avid user