Federal law strictly protects this information. Under 26 U.S. Code § 6103, tax return data is confidential and cannot be shared with other federal agencies, including immigration enforcement.
March 22, 2025 at 11:58 PM
Federal law strictly protects this information. Under 26 U.S. Code § 6103, tax return data is confidential and cannot be shared with other federal agencies, including immigration enforcement.
This action is illegal and violates IRS regulations—specifically 26 U.S. Code § 6103, which protects the confidentiality of taxpayer information. To make it happen, Trump removed the top IRS lawyer and replaced them with a loyalist.
April 8, 2025 at 12:46 PM
This action is illegal and violates IRS regulations—specifically 26 U.S. Code § 6103, which protects the confidentiality of taxpayer information. To make it happen, Trump removed the top IRS lawyer and replaced them with a loyalist.
The data-sharing agreement violates Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code. Rather than comply, these officials are standing up for what is right and are facing forced resignations as a result.
April 9, 2025 at 12:39 PM
The data-sharing agreement violates Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code. Rather than comply, these officials are standing up for what is right and are facing forced resignations as a result.
This is not legal. The IRS is not allowed to share taxpayer information (without the taxpayers permission) w/other parties except in a set of limited instances. They'd need a court order to do this.
April 5, 2025 at 2:30 PM
This is not legal. The IRS is not allowed to share taxpayer information (without the taxpayers permission) w/other parties except in a set of limited instances. They'd need a court order to do this.
February 13, 2025 at 7:11 PM
If the IRS were forced to disclose taxpayer information in violation of Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, it would set a dangerous precedent that could, in theory, be used to justify the release of anyone’s tax records—including those of high-profile individuals like Musk and Trump.
March 1, 2025 at 3:22 AM
If the IRS were forced to disclose taxpayer information in violation of Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, it would set a dangerous precedent that could, in theory, be used to justify the release of anyone’s tax records—including those of high-profile individuals like Musk and Trump.
Violating Section 6103 sets a dangerous precedent by undermining taxpayer privacy, eroding trust in the IRS, and opening the door to political abuse.
March 13, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Violating Section 6103 sets a dangerous precedent by undermining taxpayer privacy, eroding trust in the IRS, and opening the door to political abuse.
Erosion of Taxpayer Confidentiality – The IRS is bound by Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, which strictly prohibits the disclosure of taxpayer information to unauthorized entities, including other government agencies.
March 1, 2025 at 3:13 AM
Erosion of Taxpayer Confidentiality – The IRS is bound by Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, which strictly prohibits the disclosure of taxpayer information to unauthorized entities, including other government agencies.
Which federal crime did the President commit with this statement?
Was it 26 usc 7217, which prohibits the President or his aides from directing any tax enforcement action?
Or was it 26 usc 6103, which prohibits any government official from disclosing an ongoing tax proceeding?
Maybe both!
Was it 26 usc 7217, which prohibits the President or his aides from directing any tax enforcement action?
Or was it 26 usc 6103, which prohibits any government official from disclosing an ongoing tax proceeding?
Maybe both!
May 2, 2025 at 11:39 AM
Which federal crime did the President commit with this statement?
Was it 26 usc 7217, which prohibits the President or his aides from directing any tax enforcement action?
Or was it 26 usc 6103, which prohibits any government official from disclosing an ongoing tax proceeding?
Maybe both!
Was it 26 usc 7217, which prohibits the President or his aides from directing any tax enforcement action?
Or was it 26 usc 6103, which prohibits any government official from disclosing an ongoing tax proceeding?
Maybe both!
You’re supposed to wait until AFTER the game
September 27, 2026 at 6:46 PM
You’re supposed to wait until AFTER the game
Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits the unauthorized disclosure of tax returns and tax information.
Violation of this law is a FELONY.
I’m demanding answers on if Elon Musk is already violating the law.
Violation of this law is a FELONY.
I’m demanding answers on if Elon Musk is already violating the law.
February 4, 2025 at 8:49 PM
Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits the unauthorized disclosure of tax returns and tax information.
Violation of this law is a FELONY.
I’m demanding answers on if Elon Musk is already violating the law.
Violation of this law is a FELONY.
I’m demanding answers on if Elon Musk is already violating the law.
It violates 26 U.S. Code § 6103 - Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information
May 20, 2026 at 2:32 PM
It violates 26 U.S. Code § 6103 - Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information
Such actions would violate Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, which strictly limits access to taxpayer information. Under this law, tax returns and related data are confidential and can only be disclosed to authorized parties under specific circumstances outlined in the statute.
March 13, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Such actions would violate Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, which strictly limits access to taxpayer information. Under this law, tax returns and related data are confidential and can only be disclosed to authorized parties under specific circumstances outlined in the statute.
Elon Musk now has access to & control over your Social Security checks, tax refunds, and Medicare bills. It’s illegal under Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code.
February 5, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Elon Musk now has access to & control over your Social Security checks, tax refunds, and Medicare bills. It’s illegal under Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code.
The 3-0 opinion is from Pillard, an Obama appointee. She is joined by Millett and Wilkins, two other Obama appointees.
The opinion finds standing, that final agency action is involved, and that the IRS action is subject to APA review before holding the data-sharing procedure violates the law.
The opinion finds standing, that final agency action is involved, and that the IRS action is subject to APA review before holding the data-sharing procedure violates the law.
September 8, 2026 at 2:56 PM
The 3-0 opinion is from Pillard, an Obama appointee. She is joined by Millett and Wilkins, two other Obama appointees.
The opinion finds standing, that final agency action is involved, and that the IRS action is subject to APA review before holding the data-sharing procedure violates the law.
The opinion finds standing, that final agency action is involved, and that the IRS action is subject to APA review before holding the data-sharing procedure violates the law.
#HazbinHotelshtag/HazbinHotel" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link">#HazbinHotelDad Beat Dad (S1E5)
frame: 6103/35482
frame: 6103/35482
March 6, 2025 at 4:00 PM
#HazbinHotelshtag/HazbinHotel" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link">#HazbinHotelDad Beat Dad (S1E5)
frame: 6103/35482
frame: 6103/35482
Who's going to prison?
Each violation of Code 6103 carries a maximum sentence of 5 years and opens up grounds for civil suit.
www.irs.gov/irm/part11/i...
Each violation of Code 6103 carries a maximum sentence of 5 years and opens up grounds for civil suit.
www.irs.gov/irm/part11/i...
February 27, 2026 at 11:58 AM
Who's going to prison?
Each violation of Code 6103 carries a maximum sentence of 5 years and opens up grounds for civil suit.
www.irs.gov/irm/part11/i...
Each violation of Code 6103 carries a maximum sentence of 5 years and opens up grounds for civil suit.
www.irs.gov/irm/part11/i...
#HelluvaBossshtag/HelluvaBoss" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link">#HelluvaBossUNHAPPY CAMPERS (S2E5)
frame: 6103/30239
frame: 6103/30239
March 4, 2025 at 11:32 AM
#HelluvaBossshtag/HelluvaBoss" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link">#HelluvaBossUNHAPPY CAMPERS (S2E5)
frame: 6103/30239
frame: 6103/30239
26 U.S.C. § 6103 - U.S. Code - Title 26. Internal Revenue Code § 6103. Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information
26 U.S. Code § 7213 - Unauthorized disclosure of information
26 U.S. Code § 7213 - Unauthorized disclosure of information
April 6, 2025 at 11:21 AM
26 U.S.C. § 6103 - U.S. Code - Title 26. Internal Revenue Code § 6103. Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information
26 U.S. Code § 7213 - Unauthorized disclosure of information
26 U.S. Code § 7213 - Unauthorized disclosure of information
I said before that it would be illegal for IRS to turn over tax data on undocumented workers to ICE. Here's why.
In general, it is a federal crime for a federal employee to disclose tax return information. www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...
The possible exception here is 26 USC 6103(i)(2).
/1
In general, it is a federal crime for a federal employee to disclose tax return information. www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...
The possible exception here is 26 USC 6103(i)(2).
/1
April 9, 2025 at 9:31 PM
I said before that it would be illegal for IRS to turn over tax data on undocumented workers to ICE. Here's why.
In general, it is a federal crime for a federal employee to disclose tax return information. www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...
The possible exception here is 26 USC 6103(i)(2).
/1
In general, it is a federal crime for a federal employee to disclose tax return information. www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...
The possible exception here is 26 USC 6103(i)(2).
/1
Email your blue state AG. You are the victim of identity theft. Name Elon and his employees identified in the Wired article as prospective criminal defendants. I did this yesterday. The IRS code prohibits disclosure of this information. IRC Section 6103.
February 3, 2025 at 3:21 AM
Email your blue state AG. You are the victim of identity theft. Name Elon and his employees identified in the Wired article as prospective criminal defendants. I did this yesterday. The IRS code prohibits disclosure of this information. IRC Section 6103.
Happy Washington's Birthday! (5 U.S. Code § 6103)
February 17, 2025 at 1:45 PM
Happy Washington's Birthday! (5 U.S. Code § 6103)