#Amupanda
Amupanda demands answers on nationwide FMD restrictions
Renthia Kaimbi National Assembly member Job Amupanda, through his lawyers Kadhila Amoomo Legal Practitioners, has demanded urgent clarification from the ministry of agriculture, fisheries, water and land reform over the nationwide restrictions imposed following the detection of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) at a commercial farm in Karasburg in the //Kharas Region. In a letter dated 24 September, Amupanda questions why the restrictions apply across the country when the reported outbreak is confined to a single farm within the FMD Free Zone, arguing that the Veterinary Cordon Fence (Redline) was established to separate disease-control and disease-free areas. Among other things, he wants the ministry to explain the specific legal provisions supporting the nationwide suspension of livestock movement and imports and exports, whether a formal state of emergency has been declared, and what scientific or veterinary assessment justified extending restrictions to unaffected areas. The letter also asks whether the restrictions affect domestic and customary slaughter for funerals, weddings and other traditional ceremonies, and what justification exists for such measures. It further demands clarity on the economic impact of the suspension, possible compensation or financial relief for affected farmers and value-chain businesses, and the expected duration of the restrictions. Amupanda is also calling for regular public updates on laboratory results, outbreak maps and containment progress, as well as consultation with farmers’ organisations and other industry stakeholders. His lawyers have given the ministry seven days to respond, failing which they say further steps, including an urgent court application and/or raising the matter in parliament, may be considered. #WindhoekObserver
newsfeed.facilit8.network
September 24, 2026 at 3:48 PM
AR HOSTS TRAINING FOR NEWLY ELECTED LEADERS - nbc
Affirmative Repositioning (AR) Leader, Job Amupanda emphasised strong leadership skills as essential for effective leadership. Professor Amupanda was speaking during the official opening of the three-day orientation for the community, district and Interim Regional Activists Council leaders at Oniipa. The orientation aims to enhance the leadership skills of the members. "So, visibility is important, but we need to train you so that you are able to engage society. We want to create a position called the head of activist development. So it is important to know that AR is not just a political party. But we need to train you and equip you so that even tomorrow we want you to participate in this certain programme." AR members Vaino Hangula, Angelina Immanuel and Josef Jacob had this to say. "Ever since we set up our structures, we wanted to equip our elected members with leadership skills, processes and systems on how to run AR programmes, and also just to equip and empower them to become stronger advocates in their communities and their districts, we are going to have the regional training and then the nationals." "This training means so much to the AR Movement at large, because getting into politics we all understand it differently. Our leaders of AR, including myself, are seated here to be capacitated on certain issues on how to address problems, how to get solutions, how to make decisions and how to serve other people out there." "As a new AR member, I would advise every new member that is coming in to have the same spirit. Everything must change; we cannot just be the same nation as 36 years ago. It is entirely up to us to change this system."
www.youtube.com
September 24, 2026 at 6:49 PM
‘Don’t bring your meat to the north’ – Amupanda …as NAU calls for state of emergency over FMD outbreak
Renthia Kaimbi and Chamwe Kaira Affirmative Repositioning leader Job Amupanda has warned against the movement of meat from the FMD-affected south to northern Namibia, as the Namibia Agricultural Union (NAU) prepares to call for a state of emergency following the confirmation of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) in the country’s FMD-free zone. The warning comes after the government suspended the movement of all cloven-hoofed animals and their products across the country, as well as the import and export of such animals, following confirmation that 10 out of 11 samples collected from cattle in the Karasburg State Veterinary District tested positive for FMD. The outbreak, detected on a commercial farm in the //Kharas Region, has triggered immediate disease-control measures under the Animal Health Act, with authorities seeking to contain the disease and protect livestock markets. Amupanda, a long-standing advocate for the removal of the veterinary cordon fence, commonly referred to as the redline, in northern Namibia, questioned whether the outbreak should be used to reinforce divisions between the country’s livestock-producing regions. “The reality is that the reasons they were using to keep the redline have effectively collapsed like a pack of dominoes. There will still be movement of meat. If FMD is in the south of the 1896 Redline, are we expecting them to stop bringing their meat to the north?” he said. He argued that the outbreak should not be used to maintain what he described as a division of the country’s economy, saying animal disease control should not be used to “balkanize the country”. Amupanda also questioned whether veterinary cordon fences would be established around the affected area, maintaining his opposition to the continued use of the veterinary cordon fence as a mechanism for controlling livestock movement. “They were shouting Europe this and Europe that. The point is that animal disease control should not be used to balkanize the country and keep colonial projects. We need one economy and not have our country divided into two. God is for all and our God doesn’t rent in backyard flats of whites and the puppet regime!” Amupanda stated. His comments come after the NAU called for strict adherence to the movement restrictions announced by veterinary authorities and said it would ask the government to declare a state of emergency over the outbreak. The agricultural union said the declaration was necessary because of the potential consequences for the livestock industry, rural communities and the wider economy. “Given the scale of the threat to our livestock industry, our rural communities and the national economy, the NAU will call on the government to declare a state of emergency so that the full resources and power of the State are available to contain this outbreak as quickly as possible,” the union said. The movement suspension covers cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and game, as well as products including hides, dairy products and meat products. The NAU has urged farmers, livestock transporters, buyers and members of the public to comply with the restrictions and instructions issued by veterinary authorities. It said suspected cases and any unauthorised movement of cloven-hoofed animals or their products must be reported to the nearest state veterinarian. The union also called on farmers to implement strict biosecurity measures and comply with directives from the Directorate of Veterinary Services (DVS) and law-enforcement agencies. The NAU said the success of the containment effort would depend on strict compliance with the measures, warning that unauthorised animal movement, failure to report suspected cases and inadequate biosecurity could undermine efforts to control the outbreak. The union said it supports the Chief Veterinary Officer and the DVS and would back measures required to restore Namibia’s FMD-free status. Meanwhile, Meatco managing director Albertus !Aochamub said the corporation was not yet in a position to assess the full impact of the outbreak on its operations or the livestock industry. Responding to questions on the effect of the restrictions on Meatco’s procurement, processing and marketing operations, existing export consignments, possible financial losses, domestic beef supplies and potential price increases, !Aochamub said the situation was still developing. “As you are aware, the announcement was just made and the entire industry is engaged in determining the full impact. To that end, it will be foolhardy for us to comment on an evolving situation,” he said. !Aochamub said Meatco would comply with the measures issued by the relevant authorities. “We will follow all the protocols as laid down in law and communicated by the competent authority, which is the DVS in this instance,” he said. The government has warned that the outbreak could have serious implications for the national economy and livelihoods because of the suspension of livestock and livestock-product marketing locally and internationally. The authorities have said restoring and normalising livestock marketing will remain a priority once the disease is brought under control.
newsfeed.facilit8.network
September 24, 2026 at 5:20 AM
I did so much last year and I'm so proud of how far my little business has come! #CapCut #amupandashop #amupanda #queerartist #2024recap #cuteart #fypシ゚ #enby #claypins #bookmarks
January 11, 2025 at 10:35 AM
Bluesky now has over 10 million users, and I was #9,722,050!
October 2, 2024 at 8:38 AM
Amupanda affronte Kapofi plus de 3 millions de dollars volés à la construction du 26 août [Informanté] #Afropages https://twp.ai/9PRhmI
afropages.fr
Amupanda affronte Kapofi plus de 3 millions de dollars volés à la construction du 26 août [Informanté]
twp.ai
April 11, 2025 at 12:04 PM
neweralive.na/amupanda-dre...
#newcities
This guy clearly knows his stuff when it comes to new cities. He's in the opposition party and is free, for now, to make pie-in-the-sky proposals, but you don't usually see promoters of these "powerpoint cities" bring up actual, real examples like Putrajaya.
Amupanda dreams of new city – Cape Fria …pushes for fiscal sovereignty
Lahja Nashuuta The leader of Affirmative Repositioning (AR) Job Amupanda has called on the government to consider the development of a brand-new city to ease
neweralive.na
September 13, 2025 at 2:06 AM
New YT video 🌊
youtu.be/KaLSoWzPaIE?...
Painting A Beach | acrylic, paint pens, sketching, time lapse, cute art, sea life, nature, blue
YouTube video by Amupanda
youtu.be
February 20, 2025 at 9:28 PM
MP Job Amupanda calls for a capable developmental state in Namibia—urging public-led industrialisation, free higher education, land reform, and an end to apartheid-era practices. Critiques fiscal ties to SA and costly global institutions. Pro-justice, pro-youth, pro-jobs.
Addressing poverty, inequality and unemployment requires a capable developmental state
 Statement by member of parliament Job Amupanda in response to president Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah’s maiden state of the nation address. The triple challenges that Namibia faces – poverty, inequality and unemployment – commonly found in former colonies, require a capable developmental state. A state that is interventionist in character, actively involved in the economy and prioritizes industrialisation. It is a state characterised by a competent bureaucracy and underpinned by a meritocratic system. A state in which the capable one get the job, not the one that shouts the loudest. This is a state whose leadership has an ideological hegemony for a country’s developmental trajectory. Your excellency, we urgently need a developmental state. Here are suggestions on how we can address these triple challenges. Modikwa Manufacturing (Pty) Ltd The neoliberal forces may tell you that it is our small private sector that will create jobs and that as political leaders we must only cut ribbons and deliver speeches at their events. This lazy approach is fatal and discredited. We must actively get involved as a state in the economy. Our footwear/shoes imports surpass more than 5 million pairs per year, costing more than N$700 million. Our mining industry alone employs more than 18 000 people. The police have more than 10 000 members and our defence force has more than 10 000 members. These three categories alone take us to close to 50 000. If each of these employees/members require two pairs per year, then 100 000 pairs are required annually. At present, all these pairs are imported. This does not include security guards, construction workers, municipality workers, cleaners and others. If the government establishes its own shoe manufacturing factory, say Modikwa Manufacturing (Pty) Ltd, it can contribute to dealing with unemployment without difficulty. After setting it up, a mere directive from the president and/or minister of defence, police and mines will lead this state-owned company to have guaranteed income. Currently, millions are going to South Africa, the Netherlands, Germany, the United Kingdom and China for shoes. Our money creates jobs in other countries. This model can create more than 1 500 direct and indirect jobs for our youth. We can establish this factory to revive an employment zone that once existed in Damaraland at a place called Uis, in existence since 1922 or Oshikango that was once an Export Processing Zone before it was left for ruin. All it requires is your instructions and the rest will fall into place like the falling leaves of autumn. Model for Free Higher Education The successes of developmental states such as China, Botswana, Mauritius and Singapore are also owed to free education. We need to educate our children freely, not through loans. Here is how we can create a self-sustaining free education model. We do not need foreign funds to educate our children. We simply need to introduce an education fund similar to how social security operates. If the 500 000 employed Namibians each contribute N$50 and their employers do the same, we will have N$50 million per month and N$600 million per year. If this fund is left untouched during a two years’ inception period, it will be about N$2 billion. The state can contribute N$5 billion to the fund during the same inception period. In the third year, we will be able to provide free education to our children. We can demonstrate further details on this model if necessary. All it requires is a law. When passed, the econometrics will follow. Cape Fria as a New City By 2041, in less than 16 years, Windhoek will have more than 800 000 inhabitants. Around 10 000 people migrate to Windhoek every year. Solving Windhoek’s problems without having regard to these demographic realities and patterns is fatal. A courageous dog can chase a moving vehicle barking endlessly but in the fullness of time, it will discover that it will not catch up. As evil as they were and are, our oppressors sat down and designed our oppression. The Odendaal ideas of the mid to late 1960s became a plan before a commission was established followed by a law. It is no accident that places are known as clustered (Shandumbala) while others are Pioneers (Pioneers Park) and Highland (Hochland Park). We live in dark corners (Donkerhoek) while others are in Academia (for academics) with streets name after Aristotle and Plato while our children played in “Sin” and “Lucifer” streets. Our oppressors took social engineering seriously. We haven’t created a single city in 35 years. Only villages were upgraded into towns without serious and purposeful urban design. At most, these poorly conceived proclamations were upgrades of existing trade centres of local communities. Let us plan a new Namibian city from an idea, plan to action. Unlike cities planned under colonialism, ours should be one designed with love, African ingenuity and progress in mind. A city planned by a free people. Let’s establish it at Cape Fria in the Kunene region. It will be a logistical hub through our new port, with beautiful beaches and scenery, rich cultural tourism and other special economic zones. In October 1995, Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad birthed an idea of Malaysia’s third city, Putrajaya. By February 2001, it became the country’s third city. Abuja in Nigeria is another planned city built in the 1980s and replaced congested Lagos in December 1991. In both Nigeria and Malaysia, the conditions were exactly the same as in Namibia and Windhoek. Agricultural Interventions We notice your keen interest in agriculture. This sector’s potential has been strangled by colonial laws and practices protected by the government. I will not even talk about the 1896 veterinary cordon fence (redline). How else does one explain that it is the largest employer but only contributes 6% to our country’s GDP? We have less than 15 000 hectares of land under agricultural irrigation. The government green scheme combined is probably less than 8 000 hectares. At the same time, the amount of hectares given to the Chinese to produce drugs in the Zambezi region, 10 000 hectares, surpasses government green schemes combined. We need to put at least 100 000 hectares under irrigation to realise agriculture potential beyond slogans. There are many interventions we can make. By mere directive, it can be made a condition that successful bidders for food supply tenders to schools, prisons and hospitals source their food from local producers so that we cut imports. The state can enforce uptake agreements through procurement systems. For this to happen, food must first be produced. We can only hope you are moving in this direction and our suggestions are to help you. QUESTIONS Decades of select few apartheid beneficiaries  Your Excellency, when you went to exile you were tired of oppression, probably the same way some of us are tired of the continuity of colonialism 35 years after independence. You paid the price of freedom because there was a promise of freedom. You didn’t go into exile for colonialism to continue under you. 51 years ago, in 1974, MT Alberts was appointed as deputy sheriff. He is still deputy sheriff for the Kunene region today. Thirty-six years ago in 1989, JA Puleston was appointed as deputy sheriff. He is still deputy sheriff for four (4) northern ‘O regions’ and Kunene, in 2025. Andre Visser, DG Van Wyk, D Pretorius and MJ Hannes were appointed as deputy sheriffs in 1992. They are still deputy sheriffs in 2025 for the Erongo, Hardap and Khomas regions, 33 years later. PW Van Heerden was appointed deputy sheriff in 1994 and in 2025 he still remains deputy sheriff for the //Kharas region 31 years later. B Van der Westhuizen was appointed deputy sheriff in 1995 and 30 years later he remains a deputy sheriff. The deputy sheriffs are appointed in terms of section 30 of the High Court Act by the justice minister. For all these years, the Vissers, Van Heerden, Van der Westhuizen, Van Wyk and others were always appointed without an advertisement or open competition in a democratic society, a society for which you went in exile for. It was understandable when the apartheid regime appointed them in 1974 and 1989 respectively, but on what basis does the democratic government continue with the same oppression and sustain it for 35 years? For how long will this oppression and corruption continue, worse within a system that ought to ensure justice and fairness? The reality is that there is nothing special that these individuals do that cannot be done by the many graduates of law. There is nothing complicated about serving documents and holding auctions. Many competent black lawyers are in the street because of these practices that the government continues to sustain, the very practices rooted in Apartheid racism and the colonial project. In fact, because of many law graduates that are unemployed, a motion was tabled in the 7th Parliament calling for a limitation in the enrollment of law students. When are we ending this colonial practice and stopping this secret tender so that every qualifying Namibian can get an opportunity, especially law graduates? Small Claims Court Access to justice remains a challenge that is acknowledged by both ordinary people and our justice system itself. The government and the judiciary created a Commercial Court, a court for the rich, solving disputes of the rich faster. To access this Court, your dispute must involve millions. This Court was established on the recommendation of European bodies. Recently, an Environmental Crimes Court was also established to deal with Rhino horns and other wildlife crimes that Europeans are unhappy with. We now hear that there are plans to establish a Tender Court. While all these initiatives for the rich are taking place, calls for a Small Claims Court fell on deaf ears. A person owed N$ 1 500.00 by another is asked to pay N$ 2 500.00 just to see a lawyer. Who can pay 2 500 to recover 1 500? A bill actually exists, drafted 20 years ago, but was never passed. Your Excellency, is it wrong for ordinary Namibians to see the judiciary as working for foreigners, the rich and those in power? When is the small claims court coming? When is the court for the poor coming? Namibia Dollar linkage to South Africa In April 1990, the then government-owned Namibian Economic Policy Research Unit (Nepru) organised a workshop to discuss monetary independence for Namibia. Namibia’s finance minister Otto Herrigel and governors of central banks in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) joined. He made it clear that the pegging of the Namibian dollar to the South African rand was to last for a few months.  Thirty-five years later, it still remains. South African challenges continue to be domesticated here at home. What is the plan to bring fiscal sovereignty and end the unpredictable and over reliance on South Africa? What if the right wing forces one day take over South Africa and delink their Rand? How are small countries like Lesotho and Swaziland, who are more linked to South Africa than us, managing with their own currencies? The ICC, Fitch and Moody Payments Namibia’s agony with the International Criminal Court (ICC) has been heard broadly at home and abroad. In your previous role, you have been an embodiment of this agony particularly how this institution has been utilised to the detriment of the Africans and other smaller nations. Why is it that when we are struggling with resources we are still going to give more than N$1 million to the ICC in this current budget? Shouldn’t we use this money for other pressing needs of our people? We are also paying more than N$2 million to two American companies, Moody and Fitch. Why are we paying these neoliberal companies with public resources? Even if they were important, which we doubt, why don’t we choose one instead of paying two private companies that do the same job? It must be recalled that Moody contributed to the 2008 global financial crisis and Fitch is a private company owned by the Hearst family. We need to ensure financial prudence both in words and actions and stay away from speculative activities. SLEEP WITH ONE EYE OPEN Those who learn from history are bound to repeat past mistakes. I sincerely hope you learn from your predecessors whom you know better than we do. You need to sleep with one eye closed and the other one open. With due respect, we advise that a country is different from the activities of a political party. From president Sam Nujoma we learn that you need to implement your vision yourself instead of hoping that your predecessors will do it. This point was made by president Hifikepunye Pohamba recently. Your successors do not necessarily owe you continuity. Implement and where you can’t plant seeds you are sure of germination. President Nujoma wanted the National Youth Service (NYS) to orientate our youth and ensure that all of them undergo a national youth service. Today the NYS is a security guard company and deals in grape sales. President Pohamba slept with all his eyes closed and when he woke up he had a mess of a Targeted Intervention Programme for Employment and Economic Growth (TIPEEG) and mass housing. The corrupt and greedy are skilled at singing praises to the leader and posturing as the most caring. When the curtain falls, they move to the new currency leader without hesitation. How many TIPEEG and mass housing millionaires remember president Pohamba’s birthday let alone visit Okanghudi?  President Hage Geingob loved mega announcements; “prosperity” this and “prosperity” that. “No one must feel left out” and “shacks gone in five years”. Your excellency, we advise that you avoid catchy phrases, slogans and mega announcements – instead do the work. If not, in the fullness of time, this becomes your legacy. We hope to one day tell our children that we made these submissions to Meme Netumbo on 24 April 2025 and she implemented them. We will also tell them if nothing happens. President, we will support you to do good for our country and its people. Without fear whatsoever, we will equally stand up against you and the modikwa team when and where you do wrong. May the God of our people and our ancestors guide and be with you in your task and indeed as you prepare the seat for your son in 2030. I thank you. SONA-Prof-Amupanda-Intervention-Download The post Addressing poverty, inequality and unemployment requires a capable developmental state appeared first on The Namibian. Statement by member of parliament Job Amupanda in response to president Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah’s maiden state of the nation address. The triple challenges that Namibia faces – poverty, inequality and unemployment – commonly found in former colonies, require a capable developmental state. A state that is interventionist in character, actively involved in the economy and prioritizes industrialisation. It is a state characterised by a competent bureaucracy and underpinned by a meritocratic system. A state in which the capable one get the job, not the one that shouts the loudest. This is a state whose leadership has an ideological hegemony for a country’s developmental trajectory. Your excellency, we urgently need a developmental state. Here are suggestions on how we can address these triple challenges. Modikwa Manufacturing (Pty) Ltd The neoliberal forces may tell you that it is our small private sector that will create jobs and that as political leaders we must only cut ribbons and deliver speeches at their events. This lazy approach is fatal and discredited. We must actively get involved as a state in the economy. Our footwear/shoes imports surpass more than 5 million pairs per year, costing more than N$700 million. Our mining industry alone employs more than 18 000 people. The police have more than 10 000 members and our defence force has more than 10 000 members. These three categories alone take us to close to 50 000. If each of these employees/members require two pairs per year, then 100 000 pairs are required annually. At present, all these pairs are imported. This does not include security guards, construction workers, municipality workers, cleaners and others. If the government establishes its own shoe manufacturing factory, say Modikwa Manufacturing (Pty) Ltd, it can contribute to dealing with unemployment without difficulty. After setting it up, a mere directive from the president and/or minister of defence, police and mines will lead this state-owned company to have guaranteed income. Currently, millions are going to South Africa, the Netherlands, Germany, the United Kingdom and China for shoes. Our money creates jobs in other countries. This model can create more than 1 500 direct and indirect jobs for our youth. We can establish this factory to revive an employment zone that once existed in Damaraland at a place called Uis, in existence since 1922 or Oshikango that was once an Export Processing Zone before it was left for ruin. All it requires is your instructions and the rest will fall into place like the falling leaves of autumn. Model for Free Higher Education The successes of developmental states such as China, Botswana, Mauritius and Singapore are also owed to free education. We need to educate our children freely, not through loans. Here is how we can create a self-sustaining free education model. We do not need foreign funds to educate our children. We simply need to introduce an education fund similar to how social security operates. If the 500 000 employed Namibians each contribute N$50 and their employers do the same, we will have N$50 million per month and N$600 million per year. If this fund is left untouched during a two years’ inception period, it will be about N$2 billion. The state can contribute N$5 billion to the fund during the same inception period. In the third year, we will be able to provide free education to our children. We can demonstrate further details on this model if necessary. All it requires is a law. When passed, the econometrics will follow. Cape Fria as a New City By 2041, in less than 16 years, Windhoek will have more than 800 000 inhabitants. Around 10 000 people migrate to Windhoek every year. Solving Windhoek’s problems without having regard to these demographic realities and patterns is fatal. A courageous dog can chase a moving vehicle barking endlessly but in the fullness of time, it will discover that it will not catch up. As evil as they were and are, our oppressors sat down and designed our oppression. The Odendaal ideas of the mid to late 1960s became a plan before a commission was established followed by a law. It is no accident that places are known as clustered (Shandumbala) while others are Pioneers (Pioneers Park) and Highland (Hochland Park). We live in dark corners (Donkerhoek) while others are in Academia (for academics) with streets name after Aristotle and Plato while our children played in “Sin” and “Lucifer” streets. Our oppressors took social engineering seriously. We haven’t created a single city in 35 years. Only villages were upgraded into towns without serious and purposeful urban design. At most, these poorly conceived proclamations were upgrades of existing trade centres of local communities. Let us plan a new Namibian city from an idea, plan to action. Unlike cities planned under colonialism, ours should be one designed with love, African ingenuity and progress in mind. A city planned by a free people. Let’s establish it at Cape Fria in the Kunene region. It will be a logistical hub through our new port, with beautiful beaches and scenery, rich cultural tourism and other special economic zones. In October 1995, Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad birthed an idea of Malaysia’s third city, Putrajaya. By February 2001, it became the country’s third city. Abuja in Nigeria is another planned city built in the 1980s and replaced congested Lagos in December 1991. In both Nigeria and Malaysia, the conditions were exactly the same as in Namibia and Windhoek. Agricultural Interventions We notice your keen interest in agriculture. This sector’s potential has been strangled by colonial laws and practices protected by the government. I will not even talk about the 1896 veterinary cordon fence (redline). How else does one explain that it is the largest employer but only contributes 6% to our country’s GDP? We have less than 15 000 hectares of land under agricultural irrigation. The government green scheme combined is probably less than 8 000 hectares. At the same time, the amount of hectares given to the Chinese to produce drugs in the Zambezi region, 10 000 hectares, surpasses government green schemes combined. We need to put at least 100 000 hectares under irrigation to realise agriculture potential beyond slogans. There are many interventions we can make. By mere directive, it can be made a condition that successful bidders for food supply tenders to schools, prisons and hospitals source their food from local producers so that we cut imports. The state can enforce uptake agreements through procurement systems. For this to happen, food must first be produced. We can only hope you are moving in this direction and our suggestions are to help you. QUESTIONS Decades of select few apartheid beneficiaries  Your Excellency, when you went to exile you were tired of oppression, probably the same way some of us are tired of the continuity of colonialism 35 years after independence. You paid the price of freedom because there was a promise of freedom. You didn’t go into exile for colonialism to continue under you. 51 years ago, in 1974, MT Alberts was appointed as deputy sheriff. He is still deputy sheriff for the Kunene region today. Thirty-six years ago in 1989, JA Puleston was appointed as deputy sheriff. He is still deputy sheriff for four (4) northern ‘O regions’ and Kunene, in 2025. Andre Visser, DG Van Wyk, D Pretorius and MJ Hannes were appointed as deputy sheriffs in 1992. They are still deputy sheriffs in 2025 for the Erongo, Hardap and Khomas regions, 33 years later. PW Van Heerden was appointed deputy sheriff in 1994 and in 2025 he still remains deputy sheriff for the //Kharas region 31 years later. B Van der Westhuizen was appointed deputy sheriff in 1995 and 30 years later he remains a deputy sheriff. The deputy sheriffs are appointed in terms of section 30 of the High Court Act by the justice minister. For all these years, the Vissers, Van Heerden, Van der Westhuizen, Van Wyk and others were always appointed without an advertisement or open competition in a democratic society, a society for which you went in exile for. It was understandable when the apartheid regime appointed them in 1974 and 1989 respectively, but on what basis does the democratic government continue with the same oppression and sustain it for 35 years? For how long will this oppression and corruption continue, worse within a system that ought to ensure justice and fairness? The reality is that there is nothing special that these individuals do that cannot be done by the many graduates of law. There is nothing complicated about serving documents and holding auctions. Many competent black lawyers are in the street because of these practices that the government continues to sustain, the very practices rooted in Apartheid racism and the colonial project. In fact, because of many law graduates that are unemployed, a motion was tabled in the 7th Parliament calling for a limitation in the enrollment of law students. When are we ending this colonial practice and stopping this secret tender so that every qualifying Namibian can get an opportunity, especially law graduates? Small Claims Court Access to justice remains a challenge that is acknowledged by both ordinary people and our justice system itself. The government and the judiciary created a Commercial Court, a court for the rich, solving disputes of the rich faster. To access this Court, your dispute must involve millions. This Court was established on the recommendation of European bodies. Recently, an Environmental Crimes Court was also established to deal with Rhino horns and other wildlife crimes that Europeans are unhappy with. We now hear that there are plans to establish a Tender Court. While all these initiatives for the rich are taking place, calls for a Small Claims Court fell on deaf ears. A person owed N$ 1 500.00 by another is asked to pay N$ 2 500.00 just to see a lawyer. Who can pay 2 500 to recover 1 500? A bill actually exists, drafted 20 years ago, but was never passed. Your Excellency, is it wrong for ordinary Namibians to see the judiciary as working for foreigners, the rich and those in power? When is the small claims court coming? When is the court for the poor coming? Namibia Dollar linkage to South Africa In April 1990, the then government-owned Namibian Economic Policy Research Unit (Nepru) organised a workshop to discuss monetary independence for Namibia. Namibia’s finance minister Otto Herrigel and governors of central banks in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) joined. He made it clear that the pegging of the Namibian dollar to the South African rand was to last for a few months.  Thirty-five years later, it still remains. South African challenges continue to be domesticated here at home. What is the plan to bring fiscal sovereignty and end the unpredictable and over reliance on South Africa? What if the right wing forces one day take over South Africa and delink their Rand? How are small countries like Lesotho and Swaziland, who are more linked to South Africa than us, managing with their own currencies? The ICC, Fitch and Moody Payments Namibia’s agony with the International Criminal Court (ICC) has been heard broadly at home and abroad. In your previous role, you have been an embodiment of this agony particularly how this institution has been utilised to the detriment of the Africans and other smaller nations. Why is it that when we are struggling with resources we are still going to give more than N$1 million to the ICC in this current budget? Shouldn’t we use this money for other pressing needs of our people? We are also paying more than N$2 million to two American companies, Moody and Fitch. Why are we paying these neoliberal companies with public resources? Even if they were important, which we doubt, why don’t we choose one instead of paying two private companies that do the same job? It must be recalled that Moody contributed to the 2008 global financial crisis and Fitch is a private company owned by the Hearst family. We need to ensure financial prudence both in words and actions and stay away from speculative activities. SLEEP WITH ONE EYE OPEN Those who learn from history are bound to repeat past mistakes. I sincerely hope you learn from your predecessors whom you know better than we do. You need to sleep with one eye closed and the other one open. With due respect, we advise that a country is different from the activities of a political party. From president Sam Nujoma we learn that you need to implement your vision yourself instead of hoping that your predecessors will do it. This point was made by president Hifikepunye Pohamba recently. Your successors do not necessarily owe you continuity. Implement and where you can’t plant seeds you are sure of germination. President Nujoma wanted the National Youth Service (NYS) to orientate our youth and ensure that all of them undergo a national youth service. Today the NYS is a security guard company and deals in grape sales. President Pohamba slept with all his eyes closed and when he woke up he had a mess of a Targeted Intervention Programme for Employment and Economic Growth (TIPEEG) and mass housing. The corrupt and greedy are skilled at singing praises to the leader and posturing as the most caring. When the curtain falls, they move to the new currency leader without hesitation. How many TIPEEG and mass housing millionaires remember president Pohamba’s birthday let alone visit Okanghudi?  President Hage Geingob loved mega announcements; “prosperity” this and “prosperity” that. “No one must feel left out” and “shacks gone in five years”. Your excellency, we advise that you avoid catchy phrases, slogans and mega announcements – instead do the work. If not, in the fullness of time, this becomes your legacy. We hope to one day tell our children that we made these submissions to Meme Netumbo on 24 April 2025 and she implemented them. We will also tell them if nothing happens. President, we will support you to do good for our country and its people. Without fear whatsoever, we will equally stand up against you and the modikwa team when and where you do wrong. May the God of our people and our ancestors guide and be with you in your task and indeed as you prepare the seat for your son in 2030. I thank you. SONA-Prof-Amupanda-Intervention-Download The post Addressing poverty, inequality and unemployment requires a capable developmental state appeared first on The Namibian.
www.namibian.com.na
May 7, 2025 at 3:14 PM
Namibia moves to amend colonial-era ‘Red Line’ restricting northern farmers from beef markets like the EU. Gov’t plans gradual removal, citing need for equity, veterinary controls, and economic inclusion without compromising biosecurity or biodiversity.
Namibia grapples with 'red line' from the colonial era
In 1897, German colonial authorities in Namibia created a buffer zone to protect their livestock from rinderpest. The fence, known locally as the 'Red Line,' remains a divisive topic in Namibia.A high court in Namibia recently ruled against a petition brought by Job Amupanda, an activist-turned-parliamentarian, who sought the removal of the veterinary cordon fence (VCF), or the 'Red Line' as it is known in Namibia. The red line is a livestock disease control mechanism that dates back to Germany's colonial rule of Namibia. The colonial authorities set it up to prevent a rinderpest outbreak that had devastated nearly half of the cattle belonging to the Ovaherero community in the north. However, the red line became a political boundary with time, dividing Namibia, then known as German South West Africa, into north and south. In his legal challenge, Amupanda argued that safeguarding Namibia's access to prime beef destination markets like the European Union (EU) should not be carried out at the expense of equal and equitable participation for Namibian citizens in the country's economy. Attempts to remove the red line However, despite Amupanda's court case loss, the Namibian parliament approved recommendations to amend the red line regulations. "Thirty years of independence is too much. How many years do we want to wait?" Natangwe Ithete, Namibia's Deputy Prime Minister, said during the parliamentary hearing. "We just speak of foot and mouth disease, which does not kill us," Ithete stressed, adding that the same meat Europeans eat in the south is the same they consume when they go to northern Namibia. Foot and mouth disease for livestock is endemic to the country's northern regions, where wildlife such as buffaloroam freely. Namibia has occasional outbreaks because of the buffalo sharing the Kavango/Zambezi/Chobe River with Namibia at the transboundary Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZATFCA), where five countries meet. In 2022, Namibia, through the ministries of international relations as well as the ministry of agriculture, signed an agreement with KAZATFCA to not erect fences or physical borders in the area in the interest of tourism and bilateral trade with Southern African Development Countries (SADC)as well as to allow free movement of wildlife as a conservation measure. Foot and mouth disease outbreaks The five countries are Namibia, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Botswanaand Angola. Case studies in India and Germany show that foot and mouth outbreaks occasionally happen in those countries. Yet, they continue to export beef after proper veterinary measures have been taken. Politicians in Namibia argue that the Southern African nation should be no exception. "We are exporting the same meat to other countries. Why are people not dying? We should remove that [Red Line] fence and see whether we will die and see whether we will not find market. We will find market," Ithete said. For him, while controlled measures should still be enforced to prevent the spread of diseases, livestock and their owners should be allowed to move freely, provided that they obtain health certifications and recent veterinary checks during non-outbreak periods. He also suggested a robust tracing system and temporary health checkpoints along key routes to monitor for any signs of foot and mouth disease, as done south of the fence. In addition, Ithete recommended that the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Land Reform amend their current regulatory framework to allow farmers north of the red line to have market access south of the red line and to other destinations like the EU. The EU remains the prime destination of Namibian beef, with exports amounting to 1,266,236,830 Namibian Dollars (€59,091,933, $67,187,776) in 2024, according to the statistics provided by the National Statistics Agency (NSA). Namibia's beef industry Other lucrative markets for Namibian beef include the US and Norway. Beef exports are a key driver of Namibia's agricultural sector, contributing 5.1% to Namibia's GDP. "For decades, farmers from both the northern and southern regions of Namibia have significantly contributed to the country's economic stability," Thinus Pretorius, President of Namibia's Agricultural Union, an umbrella body for commercial farmers South of the Red Line, told DW. "The NAU envisions a future where all Namibian farmers have equal access to economic opportunities," Pretorius said, adding that NAU emphasized that achieving such a transition required careful planning that safeguarded Namibia's hard-earned reputation in global markets. "While discussions surrounding agricultural policy can often become emotional, the NAU remains committed to advocating for decisions grounded in facts, and economic sustainability", Pretorius further said. The government 'committed' to removing the red line Mac Hengari, Namibia's newly appointed Minister of Agriculture, told DW the Namibian government is committed to "gradually" removing the red line. "The support that we give to subsistence farmers should be geared toward moving them up the value chain and becoming commercial farmers in their own right," Hengari said. "In so doing, we then also have to give support to the existing farmers who are commercial farmers to be ambitious beyond the borders of Namibia, to be globally competitive as well. So we are building a value chain upwards, and that is the focus, so our support should not be about maintaining the status quo." In January 2025, Germany reported a foot and mouth outbreak in its eastern region, with Namibia banning imports of meat products effective February. Namibia last had a foot and mouth outbreak in 2022 in the northern Zambezi region. The area that commercial farmers say threatens Southern farmers and their lucrative beef trade. Edited by: Chrispin Mwakideu In 1897, German colonial authorities in Namibia created a buffer zone to protect their livestock from rinderpest. The fence, known locally as the 'Red Line,' remains a divisive topic in Namibia.A high court in Namibia recently ruled against a petition brought by Job Amupanda, an activist-turned-parliamentarian, who sought the removal of the veterinary cordon fence (VCF), or the 'Red Line' as it is known in Namibia. The red line is a livestock disease control mechanism that dates back to Germany's colonial rule of Namibia. The colonial authorities set it up to prevent a rinderpest outbreak that had devastated nearly half of the cattle belonging to the Ovaherero community in the north. However, the red line became a political boundary with time, dividing Namibia, then known as German South West Africa, into north and south. In his legal challenge, Amupanda argued that safeguarding Namibia's access to prime beef destination markets like the European Union (EU) should not be carried out at the expense of equal and equitable participation for Namibian citizens in the country's economy. Attempts to remove the red line However, despite Amupanda's court case loss, the Namibian parliament approved recommendations to amend the red line regulations. "Thirty years of independence is too much. How many years do we want to wait?" Natangwe Ithete, Namibia's Deputy Prime Minister, said during the parliamentary hearing. "We just speak of foot and mouth disease, which does not kill us," Ithete stressed, adding that the same meat Europeans eat in the south is the same they consume when they go to northern Namibia. Foot and mouth disease for livestock is endemic to the country's northern regions, where wildlife such as buffaloroam freely. Namibia has occasional outbreaks because of the buffalo sharing the Kavango/Zambezi/Chobe River with Namibia at the transboundary Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZATFCA), where five countries meet. In 2022, Namibia, through the ministries of international relations as well as the ministry of agriculture, signed an agreement with KAZATFCA to not erect fences or physical borders in the area in the interest of tourism and bilateral trade with Southern African Development Countries (SADC)as well as to allow free movement of wildlife as a conservation measure. Foot and mouth disease outbreaks The five countries are Namibia, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Botswanaand Angola. Case studies in India and Germany show that foot and mouth outbreaks occasionally happen in those countries. Yet, they continue to export beef after proper veterinary measures have been taken. Politicians in Namibia argue that the Southern African nation should be no exception. "We are exporting the same meat to other countries. Why are people not dying? We should remove that [Red Line] fence and see whether we will die and see whether we will not find market. We will find market," Ithete said. For him, while controlled measures should still be enforced to prevent the spread of diseases, livestock and their owners should be allowed to move freely, provided that they obtain health certifications and recent veterinary checks during non-outbreak periods. He also suggested a robust tracing system and temporary health checkpoints along key routes to monitor for any signs of foot and mouth disease, as done south of the fence. In addition, Ithete recommended that the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Land Reform amend their current regulatory framework to allow farmers north of the red line to have market access south of the red line and to other destinations like the EU. The EU remains the prime destination of Namibian beef, with exports amounting to 1,266,236,830 Namibian Dollars (€59,091,933, $67,187,776) in 2024, according to the statistics provided by the National Statistics Agency (NSA). Namibia's beef industry Other lucrative markets for Namibian beef include the US and Norway. Beef exports are a key driver of Namibia's agricultural sector, contributing 5.1% to Namibia's GDP. "For decades, farmers from both the northern and southern regions of Namibia have significantly contributed to the country's economic stability," Thinus Pretorius, President of Namibia's Agricultural Union, an umbrella body for commercial farmers South of the Red Line, told DW. "The NAU envisions a future where all Namibian farmers have equal access to economic opportunities," Pretorius said, adding that NAU emphasized that achieving such a transition required careful planning that safeguarded Namibia's hard-earned reputation in global markets. "While discussions surrounding agricultural policy can often become emotional, the NAU remains committed to advocating for decisions grounded in facts, and economic sustainability", Pretorius further said. The government 'committed' to removing the red line Mac Hengari, Namibia's newly appointed Minister of Agriculture, told DW the Namibian government is committed to "gradually" removing the red line. "The support that we give to subsistence farmers should be geared toward moving them up the value chain and becoming commercial farmers in their own right," Hengari said. "In so doing, we then also have to give support to the existing farmers who are commercial farmers to be ambitious beyond the borders of Namibia, to be globally competitive as well. So we are building a value chain upwards, and that is the focus, so our support should not be about maintaining the status quo." In January 2025, Germany reported a foot and mouth outbreak in its eastern region, with Namibia banning imports of meat products effective February. Namibia last had a foot and mouth outbreak in 2022 in the northern Zambezi region. The area that commercial farmers say threatens Southern farmers and their lucrative beef trade. Edited by: Chrispin Mwakideu
dw.com
April 16, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Free tertiary education from 2026 brings hope—but funding, quality, and job alignment remain major gaps. Prof. Amupanda proposes a CSR-based model with employer-employee contributions to sustainably fund education and promote shared responsibility in Namibia.
Rethinking Corporate Social Responsibility as a Model to Fund the Noble Idea of Free Education in Namibia – News Stand
 Lazarus Kwedhi Namibian society emerged from a history of German colonialism and apartheid under South African rule, during which native Namibians were denied access to quality education and economic opportunities. Post-independence Namibia is founded on public values of non-discrimination, including the constitutional right to education. However, despite this right, many Namibians still face challenges in accessing education due to financial constraints and limited government support. Therefore, finding a sustainable funding model for free education is critical to relieving low-income families of the financial burden and enabling their children to reach their full academic potential. In her first State of the Nation Address (SONA), President Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah announced that tertiary education would be free starting in 2026. This announcement inspired hope among many students whose academic dreams were threatened by financial difficulties. While this is a step toward equity and improved access to education, the public seeks clarity on how this free education initiative will be implemented, particularly regarding the funding model and whether it will extend to private institutions within Namibia and abroad. Although the government has declared free education at the primary and secondary levels, its implementation has faced criticism. Parents and guardians continue to bear costs related to school uniforms, stationery, textbooks, cleaning materials, development funds, transportation, and meals. This raises doubts about the true meaning of “free education” and whether it is merely political rhetoric. The government’s claim of providing free education is not fully realised in practice. Furthermore, the promise of free tertiary education comes at a time when the education system is struggling with high failure rates. Of the 40,757 learners who sat for the Namibia Senior Secondary Certificate Ordinary (NSSCO) examination in 2024, 70% did not meet university admission requirements. This follows a trend from previous years—80% in 2020, 79% in 2021, and 65% in 2022 and 2023. The public wants to know how the government plans to address these academic shortcomings to ensure more students qualify for higher education. Moreover, graduate unemployment remains a serious issue. Many tertiary graduates are unable to find jobs, with national unemployment standing at 36%. If the secondary education system continues to produce poor results and graduate unemployment remains high, the goal of free education may not achieve its intended outcomes. Addressing the quality of education and aligning it with labour market demands is essential. Internships offer temporary relief, but they are not a long-term solution. A comprehensive strategy that links tertiary education with labour market needs is required to improve employment outcomes. While the idea of free education is commendable, its implementation depends heavily on available financial resources. Currently, over 80% of the national budget is spent on operational costs such as salaries, leaving limited funds for development. As a result, the government’s ability to fully fund free education is constrained. Parents and guardians continue to fill the funding gaps, despite the promise of “free” education. The public seeks to understand how the 8th administration under President Nandi-Ndaitwah will address these budget constraints and reallocate funds from operational to developmental expenditures. Namibia’s current debt stands at N$165 billion—65% of GDP—with a projected budget deficit of N$12.8 billion. This raises concerns about the sustainability of free tertiary education. Currently, tertiary education is funded through a mix of government subsidies and financial assistance provided by the Namibia Students Financial Assistance Fund (NSFAF). However, this model is not comprehensive, as many students are excluded, and the fund itself is financially unstable due to poor loan repayment rates. The NSFAF remains dependent on government support and is vulnerable to political influence, particularly during election periods. During the SONA question session, Prof. Job Shipululo Amupanda of the Affirmative Repositioning movement welcomed the president’s initiative but raised concerns about its funding. He warned against financing free education through increased national borrowing and proposed an alternative funding model inspired by the Social Security Commission. In this model, both employees and employers would contribute a small percentage of monthly income toward a dedicated education fund, similar to how social security covers maternity leave and workplace injuries. This proposal is rooted in the principles of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which obligate businesses to reinvest in the communities where they operate. Instead of allowing profits to be exported while local communities remain underdeveloped, corporations should contribute directly to national development, including education. Prof. Amupanda’s model also aligns with the African philosophy of Ubuntu, which emphasises collective responsibility. Just as a community raises a child, it can also educate a child—with contributions from both workers and businesses. Implementing a legally mandated employer-employee contribution model would not only secure long-term funding for education but would also foster a sense of shared ownership and responsibility. It would redefine CSR from a voluntary, charity-based approach to a structured, national initiative that directly supports education and national development. This model would also help address housing challenges by expanding employer responsibilities in other key areas. In return, the education system, especially universities and vocational training centres, would produce skilled professionals who contribute to the labour market and the very industries that funded their education. This creates a sustainable, mutually beneficial cycle between the education sector and the economy. In conclusion, while government efforts to provide free tertiary education are commendable, these efforts must be matched with practical, sustainable funding strategies. Prof. Amupanda’s CSR-based model presents a viable alternative that draws on community values, economic realities, and national unity. It is time for Namibia to rethink how it funds education and to consider inclusive, collaborative models that ensure quality education is accessible to all.
www.observer24.com.na
May 4, 2025 at 7:40 AM
Ngurare to probe research restrictions at Home Affairs
Staff Reporter PRIME Minister Dr Tjitunga Elijah Ngurare has undertaken to investigate concerns over a directive allegedly restricting research into the systems, processes and information held by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Immigration, Safety and Security. The issue was raised in the National Assembly on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, by Affirmative Repositioning (AR) leader and parliamentarian Job Amupanda, who questioned how research is governed and whether the Prime Minister was aware of the alleged directive. Amupanda said he was concerned by a position reportedly communicated by the Ministry’s Acting Executive Director, Jackson Wandjiva, that research into the Ministry’s systems, processes or information would not be permitted, including research conducted by Ministry employees. He questioned whether research in Namibia was governed through the Ministry of Education, Innovation, Youth, Sport, Arts and Culture and the National Commission on Research, Science and Technology (NCRST), or whether individual ministries could impose separate restrictions. Amupanda also questioned the impact of the directive on research into areas such as procurement processes within the Ministry. Responding, Ngurare said research in Namibia is regulated through the NCRST and that the system has its origins in efforts dating back to the early 2000s to establish the country’s research capacity. He said legislation was subsequently developed to provide a framework for research in Namibia and that research is currently managed through the relevant ministry responsible for the NCRST. Ngurare said he was not aware of the directive referred to by Amupanda and would investigate the matter after the parliamentary session. “If there is anything else as to your question, after this Parliament I would definitely want to find out how this happened and why that happened,” Ngurare said. He added that if the directive exists, it would be necessary to establish the legal basis on which it was issued and why it appears to differ from the existing framework governing research. Ngurare said the Government would continue to follow the established framework for research and promised to provide feedback on the matter. Photo: Parliament of the Republic of Namibia The post Ngurare to probe research restrictions at Home Affairs appeared first on Informanté.
newsfeed.facilit8.network
September 17, 2026 at 6:05 PM
The most righteous of them all, Professor Bicycle Cones
Dino Ballotti As a bona fide member of the mighty Swapo Party, elected on the ticket of the majority of Namibians who entrusted us to lead this country, the same movement that Honourable Job Amupanda once embraced and emerged from, one cannot help but wonder whether, in departing from the movement, you also departed from some of the political consciousness and values it instilled in you. For years, we have been lectured by the Professor; the most learned, the most righteous among us all. The very same mayor who, in an extraordinary display of municipal experimentation, chose to litter Windhoek’s streets with orange cycling cones, a grand experiment that became a subject of ridicule rather than a lasting solution to the city’s problems. The same mayor who, during his 2019 mayoral campaign, promised 76 500 housing units. The same Affirmative Repositioning manifesto that proposed a municipal construction company to self-build houses. Fast-forward to his assumption of the mayoral office in 2020, when the Professor spoke at a land and housing seminar about 7 000 erven in informal settlements, 3 000 erven in formal areas, 600 houses by December 2021 and the establishment of Nova Actus as the city’s commercial vehicle for accelerating land and housing delivery. There is a progression here; stay with me. First 76 500 houses promised. Then 10 000 erven targeted. Then a 600-house pilot target. Finally, Nova Actus. And yet, as of today, the fully registered Nova Actus remains non-operational. Professor, you promised tens of thousands of houses and, when questioned, you said, “Allow us to implement our plan.” Big promises; little delivery. You also promised to reduce municipal rates and taxes by 12%; reopen Ramatex; provide police housing; establish a bicycle-production factory; and, importantly, take council meetings and governance into communities. When you ascended to the mayoralty, you brought vigour, albeit short-lived. You had spent years telling Namibians that the old political order was incapable of solving their problems. Yet when you sought the mayoral office, you promised us big things, just like those big billboards. At what point do ambitious political promises become a question of delivery rather than rhetoric? Honourable Professor, you were exceptionally good at diagnosing Windhoek’s problems. The question history now asks is whether you were equally effective at solving them. A politician cannot campaign as the man who will break the system and then, after occupying the mayoral chair, explain why the same system prevented him from doing so. You have fashioned yourself as Namibia’s political prosecutor-in-chief. Almost every passing day brings another accusation; corrupt ministers, incompetent officials, captured institutions, a failing parliament and, it seems, everyone being guilty of something. But what happens when Namibians stop asking what Job Amupanda says about everybody else and begin asking the much more uncomfortable question: What exactly did Job Amupanda deliver? Your political brand has been built around confrontation, disruption, selective outrage and a basket of promises of transformation. A serious politician should occasionally undertake some introspection. But in the world of bright orange cycling cones, there is always somebody else to blame. Namibians must distinguish between political activism and political achievement. Activism rewards visibility; government rewards delivery. You have become a prominent political voice on social media, where views, likes and viral moments can easily become a barometer of influence. But surely a country cannot be governed through Facebook posts. There is a distinction between being a political social-media influencer, where someone can tell Kalola to record proceedings in the chambers, and being a political leader who respects the rules that elected representatives swore to uphold. The same standard you demand from others must be applied to yourself. The resignations of comrades Dimbulkeni, Simon Amunime and Paulus Paulus, who have publicly raised serious concerns about your conduct, including allegations of character assassination and bullying, also deserve consideration. Job Amupanda is AR and, increasingly, AR has become synonymous with Job Amupanda. It is difficult to separate the political movement from the personality at its centre. Your doctorate does not make you infallible. Your intellectual ability does not give you the right to degrade others. And being the most academically qualified person in a room does not make everyone else intellectually irrelevant. Then there is the Jade Lennon article published on 2 June 2021, titled “Here is the proof: How Dr Job Amupanda plagiarises Wikipedia and distorts the work of other writers.” The article presented textual comparisons and allegations concerning Amupanda’s academic work. Those are serious allegations; they should either be properly answered or put to rest through credible evidence. Academic qualifications, like political power, do not place anyone beyond scrutiny. Politics requires something that cannot simply be obtained from a university: humility. You appear remarkably comfortable dishing out criticism, but considerably less comfortable receiving it. Namibians must resist the temptation to judge Amupanda by the volume of his accusations. They should judge him by the same standard he applies to everyone else. What did you promise? What did you deliver? What changed in Windhoek when you wore the mayoral chain? And what happened inside your own movement when people dared to disagree with you? The idea that because someone is permanently angry with the government, he must therefore be a better alternative to government is false. A politician can correctly identify the failures of the establishment and still be wrong for the country. You can expose weaknesses in other people’s leadership while failing to demonstrate effective leadership yourself. Your political strategy of remaining permanently in opposition, even after briefly occupying a position of executive authority, cannot substitute for governance. The self-styled righteous one who led the mixed-vegetables coalition must not assume that Namibians will simply turn the other cheek indefinitely. For far too long, we have remained silent while you launched attack after attack. That silence may have been interpreted as tolerance, but it should not be mistaken for acceptance. The same confrontational conduct that has repeatedly generated controversy at the City of Windhoek cannot simply be transferred to the National Assembly. Parliament cannot be rendered dysfunctional by one individual. Political points cannot be scored at the expense of parliamentary order. Allegations must be supported by evidence; criticism must remain within the boundaries of democratic discourse; and political opponents must not be reduced to targets of personal attacks. Politics of slander, intimidation and harassment have no place in a constitutional democracy. Neither should academic credentials be treated as a monopoly on wisdom. Education should deepen humility, not produce arrogance. And being an educator once respected by many should not shield anyone from accountability when their political conduct becomes questionable. The lesson is simple. The Professor may have the microphone, the doctorate and the political stage; but Namibia still deserves to ask the most basic question of all: beyond the rhetoric, where are the results? Because leadership is not measured by how loudly one condemns everyone else. It is measured by what one builds when given the opportunity to lead.
newsfeed.facilit8.network
September 5, 2026 at 6:11 AM