For Medical Devices, “Possible Use” Amounts To Infringement Only If The Use Is In Line With Medical Practice

So, it turns out that no, you can't sue someone at the UPC and then demand security for your legal costs for them to have the privilege of defending themselves. Only a defendant can seek security for costs. The UPC Court of Appeal ends some first instance madness.
eip.com/uk/latest/ar...

For Medical Devices, “Possible Use” Amounts To Infringement Only If The Use Is In Line With Medical Practice

For Medical Devices, “Possible Use” Amounts To Infringement Only If The Use Is In Line With Medical Practice

AorticLab S.r.l. Announces Clear Victory Before the European Unified Patent Court in Litigation Brought by Emboline, Inc. - PR Newswire: AorticLab S.r.l. Announces Clear Victory Before the European Unified Patent Court in Litigation Brought by Emboline, Inc.  PR Newswire

AorticLab fends off infringement suit by US competitor Emboline - JUVE Patent: AorticLab fends off infringement suit by US competitor Emboline  JUVE Patent

Emboline Wins Key Legal Battle Against AorticLab Over Patent Rights in Germany#Germany#Munich#Patent_Rights#AorticLab#Emboline

AorticLab Triumphs Over Emboline in UPC Patent Litigation, Securing Patient Access#Italy#AorticLab#Emboline#FLOWer™#Colleretto_Giacosa

AorticLab Achieves Milestone with FDA Approval for FLOWer™ Device Investigation#USA#New_York#FDA_Approval#AorticLab#FLOWer

For Medical Devices, “Possible Use” Amounts To Infringement Only If The Use Is In Line With Medical Practice