**Authors:** Richard Moot We show that type-logical grammars with the standard rules for product, associativity, extraction and infixation have an NP-complete fixed recognition problem, adapting a construction for first-order linear logic from Pshenitsyn (2025), who already showed that grammars in first-order linear logic are closed under intersection and therefore not semilinear and not mildly context-sensitive. We strengthen these results and shown that grammars in first-order linear logic can simulate the quasi-linear grammars of Book \& Greibach (1970), the grammars recognised in non-deterministic linear time (NSPACE(n) or. NLIN). I argue that NLIN is an interesting class of formal languages as well, and a useful upper bound on the time complexity of formalisms used for natural language, just like LOGCFL is a useful upper bound on the space complexity. Taken together this means that first-order linear logic can be seen as the logic of non-deterministic linear-time string languages, graph languages and automata.

Reasoning about higher identity types uses two equalities, strict equality and equivalence of cells witnessed by a path. Strict equality is a congruence for every operation on cells, but associativity and the identity laws fail for it. Equivalence of cells satisfies those two laws, but it is not a congruence. Representations of higher identity types often conflate equational properties that hold strictly with those that hold only up to a path. We separate the two and axiomatize the former, introducing SEq, an equational theory generated by eleven axioms for strict equality between cells. We prove soundness and completeness for homotopy models, and completeness already over finite CW-complexes. Nine of these axioms form a strongly normalizing rewrite system whose normal forms are unique up to picture equivalence, and the resulting word problem is decidable in exponential time. We also give presheaf models over a cubical base category in which composition arises from a pushout in the base category itself, without requiring Kan filling structure. The same pushout structure provides explicit higher-dimensional witnesses for associativity and the identity laws.

A paradox — an endomorphism whose square is negative identity — admits four responses; secretion, the fourth, identifies the paradox condition as the associativity axiom of complex multiplication, making the category of paradoxes equivalent to the category of complex vector spaces.