#Basslink
Attn Tasmania. To justify Marinus, the assumptions will be ridiculous. With Basslink, they developed a Stranded Asset Model arguing that without Basslink Hydro would be stranded. What fantasy will they invent this time? #politas
July 28, 2025 at 9:16 AM
Who in Hydro Tasmania concocted the Stranded Asset Model to justify Basslink? Gas at Bell Bay would render Hydro becoming stranded so needed Basslink to ship energy to mainland at zero cost was how the ‘wizardry’ unfolded. Utter bullshit. Wait for similar concoction re Marinus. @reneweconomy.com.au
July 27, 2025 at 10:12 AM
After Basslink debacle and the exposure of manipulated business case, Hydro people responsible feared a Royal Commission. Many left. What a pity we didn’t have a RC then. Perhaps it’s time to have one into both Basslink and Marinus.
July 26, 2025 at 5:33 AM
A bid to convert the Basslink undersea cable into a regulated transmission asset knocked back by regulator as offering too little benefit at too high a cost to consumers
Regulator rejects Basslink bid in draft decision on troubled undersea cable
A bid to convert the Basslink undersea cable into a regulated transmission asset knocked back by regulator as offering too little benefit at too high a cost to consumers.
reneweconomy.com.au
December 17, 2024 at 5:50 AM
While they are explaining perhaps Jeremy Rockliff can explain why Tas has been importing so much energy over Basslink for the past year. Is Hydro holding back storages and so manipulating the Marinus business case just as it did for Basslink? No increase in demand, so why this pattern? #politas
March 31, 2025 at 8:45 AM
Jeremy Rockliff said power bills would go down with Marinus. Now he’s saying he will subsidise big end of town and consumers to make sure bills go down. But, the funding for those subsidies relies on $200-400million profit from selling energy to mainland. What, if like Basslink, there is no profit?
July 26, 2025 at 5:29 AM
The rent seekers are gearing up in Tas election. After paying $27 m for Norske Skog developer David Marriner secured $24m from Lab in Fed election. Now he wants 45MW more power from Hydro at bulk discount rate. He can access it via Basslink but would have to pay more. #politas🧵
June 29, 2025 at 11:45 PM
Bruce Mountain has watched Marinus closely and written extensively on why it is an economic basket case. His reaction to latest Bowen/ Rockliff deal. www.linkedin.com/posts/bruce-...
Almost 20 years ago I advised the fund that bought Basslink from the (British) National Grid Company. | Bruce Mountain
Almost 20 years ago I advised the fund that bought Basslink from the (British) National Grid Company. NGC (and Macquarie) had run rings around the representatives of the Tasmanian people, and it was t...
www.linkedin.com
August 2, 2025 at 4:23 AM
All talk of regional jobs from windfarm construction at Robbins Is is just that, talk. Construction uses FIFO. There will be no economic benefit to Tas. Instead every electricity consumer will pay higher power bills because of the cost of Marinus Link and NW Transmission line on top of Basslink.
August 29, 2025 at 8:13 AM
HydroTas/Marinus must be working in overdrive on creative accounting to try to manipulate business case for Marinus, just as Hydro did for Basslink in 2004. It was soon exposed as a failure. Now that regulator has put kibosh on Basslink/regulated asset cost sharing, what’s next magic trick? #politas
December 17, 2024 at 10:34 PM
Worse still re Basslink was fact that they hedged interest rates and FE exposure off balance sheet such that they were incurring big losses making it too difficult to quit. Are they doing it again? #Marinus @reneweconomy.com.au
July 27, 2025 at 10:12 AM
AER draft decision to reject APA Group application to make Basslink a regulated asset throws spanner in works of Tas Govt cost benefit analysis of Marinus Link. Tas expected a 90% Vic and 10% Tas cost of use of Basslink to be basis for Marinus costing, but now all up in air. #politas 🧵
December 17, 2024 at 7:25 AM
Tas Govt big 200% renewables spin to export to mainland via Marinus has been kiboshed. Mainland doesn’t need it at the price it will cost. As AER has just said re Basslink. Cost of cable and therefore cost of use of cable is way too high and its benefit to NEM, way too low. #politas
cost.as
December 17, 2024 at 11:06 PM
AER says undersea cable linking Tasmania to mainland can become a regulated asset, to help ensure the “open flow of electricity” across the Bass Strait.
Basslink gets all-clear to become regulated asset, in change of heart on troubled inter-connector
AER says undersea cable linking Tasmania to mainland can become a regulated asset, to help ensure the “open flow of electricity” across the Bass Strait.
reneweconomy.com.au
June 26, 2025 at 3:31 AM
The average Tas family (3-4) spends $170 p/f on power. Under Marinus it will spike 30% to $221 p/f +$47 p/a.

$170 is already 20% higher thanks to Basslink & selling on the NEM. By totally cutting off mainland, that family should see prices drop to $136 per fortnight. #pulltheplug #politas #auspol
Breaking: Deal has been done between Vic and Tas on cost allocation for Marinus. Tas will pay 27.6% of cost of using the cable and Vic 72.4%. Marinus is going to add $47 per annum to every Tas residential customer… tell us again about lower power bills Premier Rockliff. #auspol #politas
April 6, 2025 at 8:29 PM
I have an OG Infinity Basslink in my i3 and it doesn't have the mounting legs, but I didn't want to go outside and measure the dimensions of mine. Fortunately one person is selling a single leg on eBay and has a tape measure in the picture. I can work with this.
January 27, 2025 at 5:35 AM
It frustrates me that Aurora can hold the Boyer mill to ransom when the only service they provide is as a middleman that reads the meter.
All because Basslink made Tas part of the NEM and Hydro can't generate and retail to Boyer.
#politas
October 11, 2025 at 11:29 PM
Interesting example of an infrastructure-for-public-benefit owned by the public: Commonwealth of Australia (49%), the Victorian Government (33.3%), and the Tasmanian Government (17.7%).
September 4, 2025 at 3:25 PM
Does that include funding for things we don’t want such as the stadium and the 2nd Basslink cable?
July 3, 2025 at 3:54 AM
Perhaps Guy Barnett or Jeremy Rockliff can explain why they have argued Tas energy is so essential to NEM when AER concluded Basslink is too little benefit at too high a cost. Tas Govt made it up to justify ‘build it and they will come.’ @AEMO needs to explain itself too. #politas
December 17, 2024 at 11:10 PM
From the decision to flood Lake Pedder, to its attempt to flood the Franklin, to its dodgy business case for Basslink, to its decision to rebuild ageing dams, Hydro Tas has not covered itself in glory. Marinus is next sorry chapter. #politas
December 17, 2024 at 7:25 AM
‘Bid to convert Basslink to a regulated transmission asset looks likely to be kiboshed by the regulator on basis that it offers too little benefit to national energy market at too high a cost to consumers’- perfect summary @reneweconomy.com.au Exactly same applies to Marinus. #politas
December 17, 2024 at 8:11 PM
The con job in Basslink business case was the inclusion of gas as source of excess capacity for export. We were going to import gas, convert it to energy and sell it to mainland for mega profit… didn’t happen. Who injected gas into Basslink business case? Keen to have the individuals give evidence.
July 26, 2025 at 6:35 AM