#BidProtests
Tired of bid protests derailing your public construction projects? The fix starts on bid day.

New best practice: request only the absolute minimum documents at bid opening. No full proposals.

👉 www.colbitech.com/post/only-mi...

#ConstructionBidding #PublicWorks #BidProtests #GovProcurement
Only Minimum Docs on Bid Day: Best Practices to Minimize Protests on Construction Bids
Requiring unnecessary documents on bid day can increase protest risk and complicate public construction bidding. California law generally requires only five core bid documents for construction project...
www.colbitech.com
June 3, 2026 at 8:28 PM
NEW RISKS IN FILING FEDERAL BID PROTESTS for Incumbent Contractor. Under 2026 NDAA, DOD to withhold up to 5% of payments under the incumbent contract while a protest is being heard.
rosecoveredglasses.wordpress.com/2026/01/09/i...
#GovernmentContract #BidProtests
January 9, 2026 at 11:18 AM
"#AI in #Proposal #Evaluations: What Could Go Wrong?" w/ Attain's Greg J. Baroni @AlphaSixCorp's Matt Colantonio @GeorgeMasonU @Costello_Biz Greg and Camille Baroni Center for Government Contracting's Mike Derrios @HHSGov's Kevin Misener @BurrForman's David Timm #BidProtests
May 19, 2026 at 5:41 PM
The Federal Circuit reaffirmed that only actual or prospective bidders or offerors qualify as “interested parties” under the Tucker Act, overturning a 2024 ruling that had temporarily expanded standing to include commercial vendors.
Read more: https://bit.ly/3JMav9K
#BidProtests
Federal Circuit Holds En Banc That Only “Actual or Prospective Bidders or Offerors” May Protest at COFC
WHAT: In Percipient.ai, Inc. v. United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held in a 7-4 en banc decision that the definition of “interested party” under the Tucker Act (28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1)) remains “actual or prospective bidder...
www.wiley.law
September 4, 2025 at 1:51 PM