“Border Patrol often ignores this regulation & aside from limiting interior #checkpoint locations to within the 💯-mile zone rejects any geographic limitation on agents' authority
At least 2️⃣ federal circuit courts condone #BorderPatrolOperations outside the 💯-mile zone… #SupremeCourt notwithstanding”
At least 2️⃣ federal circuit courts condone #BorderPatrolOperations outside the 💯-mile zone… #SupremeCourt notwithstanding”
The Constitution in the 100-Mile Border Zone | American Civil Liberties Union
The Problem The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects Americans from random and arbitrary stops and searches. According to the government, however, these basic constitutional principle...
www.aclu.org
August 26, 2025 at 5:05 AM
“Border Patrol often ignores this regulation & aside from limiting interior #checkpoint locations to within the 💯-mile zone rejects any geographic limitation on agents' authority
At least 2️⃣ federal circuit courts condone #BorderPatrolOperations outside the 💯-mile zone… #SupremeCourt notwithstanding”
At least 2️⃣ federal circuit courts condone #BorderPatrolOperations outside the 💯-mile zone… #SupremeCourt notwithstanding”
“…aside from limiting interior checkpoint locations to within the #100-milezone, rejects any #geographicLimitation on #agents'authority
At least 2 federal circuit courts condone #BorderPatroloperations outside the #100-milezone, #FederalRegulations & #SCOTUS precedent notwithstanding…”
At least 2 federal circuit courts condone #BorderPatroloperations outside the #100-milezone, #FederalRegulations & #SCOTUS precedent notwithstanding…”
April 14, 2025 at 6:08 PM
“…aside from limiting interior checkpoint locations to within the #100-milezone, rejects any #geographicLimitation on #agents'authority
At least 2 federal circuit courts condone #BorderPatroloperations outside the #100-milezone, #FederalRegulations & #SCOTUS precedent notwithstanding…”
At least 2 federal circuit courts condone #BorderPatroloperations outside the #100-milezone, #FederalRegulations & #SCOTUS precedent notwithstanding…”