Programs that support women experiencing commercial sexual exploitation, often rely on flexibility and relationship-based trust to be effective, yet these same qualities make them difficult to evaluate using conventional, researcher-driven methods. This commentary examines ...

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a research approach in which academic and community partners share governance of the research process itself. Its defining principles are co-learning, in which researchers and community members each contribute expertise and each expect to be changed by the exchange; power-sharing over decisions about questions, methods, interpretation, and dissemination; and iterative cycles of enquiry and action, in which findings feed back into local practice and the revised practice becomes the next object of study. Applied consistently, these principles have been shown to strengthen the rigour, relevance, and reach of research rather than to trade rigour for participation.10 CBPR demonstrates that communities can generate and interpret knowledge within their own contexts, priorities, and capacities in ways that powerfully complement expert perspectives.6,11,12 Reviews of participatory methods in health services highlight the value of shared governance, reflexivity, and long-term relationships, and show that these principles apply with particular force in settings shaped by structural inequity — including Indigenous health contexts, where community-led engagement approaches have substantially improved the relevance and reach of health research.7 A systematic narrative review of grassroots indicators found that communities co-develop indicators that prioritise trust, reciprocity, and local governance — dimensions that enrich formal preparedness...

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a research approach in which academic and community partners share governance of the research process itself. Its defining principles are co-learning, in which researchers and community members each contribute expertise and each expect to be changed by the exchange; power-sharing over decisions about questions, methods, interpretation, and dissemination; and iterative cycles of enquiry and action, in which findings feed back into local practice and the revised practice becomes the next object of study. Applied consistently, these principles have been shown to strengthen the rigour, relevance, and reach of research rather than to trade rigour for participation.10 CBPR demonstrates that communities can generate and interpret knowledge within their own contexts, priorities, and capacities in ways that powerfully complement expert perspectives.6,11,12 Reviews of participatory methods in health services highlight the value of shared governance, reflexivity, and long-term relationships, and show that these principles apply with particular force in settings shaped by structural inequity — including Indigenous health contexts, where community-led engagement approaches have substantially improved the relevance and reach of health research.7 A systematic narrative review of grassroots indicators found that communities co-develop indicators that prioritise trust, reciprocity, and local governance — dimensions that enrich formal preparedness...

YouTube video by The Dodo

Yudit Namer, Anne Stöcker, Amani Ashour, Janine Dieckmann, Philipp Schmidt, Carmen Zurbriggen: Intersectional Challenges to Cohesion? - On Marginalization in an Inclusive Society

YouTube video by Pedro Garcia Trebejo

* DIFC first in the region to advance position on data protection, regulations, and governance within the Global Forum Assembly (GFA) * In 2022, DIFC Commissioner recognised Cross Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) as an adequate mechanism for free flow of…

Two Swedish agencies have closed their investigations into a high-profile research center at Chalmers University of Technology that was suspended last year for “shortcomings in the operations.” The Center for Bionics and Pain Research (CBPR), known for its work on restoring limb function, was scrutinized and ultimately shut down after a university investigation last April … Continue reading Swedish regulators drop investigations into Chalmers’ prosthetics lab

Two Swedish agencies have closed their investigations into a high-profile research center at Chalmers University of Technology that was suspended last year for “shortcomings in the operations.” The Center for Bionics and Pain Research (CBPR), known for its work on restoring limb function, was scrutinized and ultimately shut down after a university investigation last April … Continue reading Swedish regulators drop investigations into Chalmers’ prosthetics lab

Two Swedish agencies have closed their investigations into a high-profile research center at Chalmers University of Technology that was suspended last year for “shortcomings in the operations.” The Center for Bionics and Pain Research (CBPR), known for its work on restoring limb function, was scrutinized and ultimately shut down after a university investigation last April … Continue reading Swedish regulators drop investigations into Chalmers’ prosthetics lab

Two Swedish agencies have closed their investigations into a high-profile research center at Chalmers University of Technology that was suspended last year for “shortcomings in the operations.” The Center for Bionics and Pain Research (CBPR), known for its work on restoring limb function, was scrutinized and ultimately shut down after a university investigation last April … Continue reading Swedish regulators drop investigations into Chalmers’ prosthetics lab