A dormir me caho en di
March 23, 2025 at 4:37 AM
A dormir me caho en di
"Official time being kept in a room next to a Fogo de Chão in suburban Chicago."
September 8, 2026 at 1:23 AM
"Official time being kept in a room next to a Fogo de Chão in suburban Chicago."
seriously though, mock Eugene all you want, I do it all the time, but CAHOOTS (drug/mental health crisis response team) is the one thing Eugene created that really should be everywhere
whitebirdclinic.org/what-is-caho...
whitebirdclinic.org/what-is-caho...
whitebirdclinic.org
October 17, 2025 at 2:54 PM
seriously though, mock Eugene all you want, I do it all the time, but CAHOOTS (drug/mental health crisis response team) is the one thing Eugene created that really should be everywhere
whitebirdclinic.org/what-is-caho...
whitebirdclinic.org/what-is-caho...
Doğru düzgün eğitim alam son nesil 80 kuşağı. Geri kalan planlı bi şekilde ZIR CAHO bırakıldı
June 13, 2025 at 8:38 PM
Doğru düzgün eğitim alam son nesil 80 kuşağı. Geri kalan planlı bi şekilde ZIR CAHO bırakıldı
2/ This matters because the CAHO isn't just an administrator.
Under 28 CFR 68.54, parties can seek administrative review of an ALJ's final decision by the CAHO. The CAHO can modify or vacate the ALJ's order or remand the case.
28 CFR 0.118 also assigns the CAHO supervision of OCAHO's ALJs.
Under 28 CFR 68.54, parties can seek administrative review of an ALJ's final decision by the CAHO. The CAHO can modify or vacate the ALJ's order or remand the case.
28 CFR 0.118 also assigns the CAHO supervision of OCAHO's ALJs.
August 24, 2026 at 4:20 PM
2/ This matters because the CAHO isn't just an administrator.
Under 28 CFR 68.54, parties can seek administrative review of an ALJ's final decision by the CAHO. The CAHO can modify or vacate the ALJ's order or remand the case.
28 CFR 0.118 also assigns the CAHO supervision of OCAHO's ALJs.
Under 28 CFR 68.54, parties can seek administrative review of an ALJ's final decision by the CAHO. The CAHO can modify or vacate the ALJ's order or remand the case.
28 CFR 0.118 also assigns the CAHO supervision of OCAHO's ALJs.
6/ OCAHO had a Deputy CAHO, Elizabeth Vayo. But she had never been appointed by the AG.
Since the CAHO exercises significant adjudicatory and supervisory authority, the CAHO is an inferior officer under the Appointments Clause.
And the Deputy would be too when exercising those powers.
Since the CAHO exercises significant adjudicatory and supervisory authority, the CAHO is an inferior officer under the Appointments Clause.
And the Deputy would be too when exercising those powers.
August 24, 2026 at 4:26 PM
6/ OCAHO had a Deputy CAHO, Elizabeth Vayo. But she had never been appointed by the AG.
Since the CAHO exercises significant adjudicatory and supervisory authority, the CAHO is an inferior officer under the Appointments Clause.
And the Deputy would be too when exercising those powers.
Since the CAHO exercises significant adjudicatory and supervisory authority, the CAHO is an inferior officer under the Appointments Clause.
And the Deputy would be too when exercising those powers.
9/ The FOIA production shows what happened next.
On 1/23/25, EOIR Acting Director Sirce Owen sent McHenry, who was now in the role of Acting Attorney General, an urgent action memo asking him to appoint Vayo as DEPUTY CAHO.
Not CAHO. Not Acting CAHO. Deputy CAHO.
www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/w2h13...
On 1/23/25, EOIR Acting Director Sirce Owen sent McHenry, who was now in the role of Acting Attorney General, an urgent action memo asking him to appoint Vayo as DEPUTY CAHO.
Not CAHO. Not Acting CAHO. Deputy CAHO.
www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/w2h13...
August 24, 2026 at 4:29 PM
9/ The FOIA production shows what happened next.
On 1/23/25, EOIR Acting Director Sirce Owen sent McHenry, who was now in the role of Acting Attorney General, an urgent action memo asking him to appoint Vayo as DEPUTY CAHO.
Not CAHO. Not Acting CAHO. Deputy CAHO.
www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/w2h13...
On 1/23/25, EOIR Acting Director Sirce Owen sent McHenry, who was now in the role of Acting Attorney General, an urgent action memo asking him to appoint Vayo as DEPUTY CAHO.
Not CAHO. Not Acting CAHO. Deputy CAHO.
www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/w2h13...
15/ I have been through the regulations and cannot find a provision saying that the Deputy CAHO automatically becomes Acting CAHO, or inherits all CAHO adjudicatory authority, whenever the CAHO is absent.
The regs repeatedly assign specific powers to "the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer."
The regs repeatedly assign specific powers to "the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer."
August 24, 2026 at 4:36 PM
15/ I have been through the regulations and cannot find a provision saying that the Deputy CAHO automatically becomes Acting CAHO, or inherits all CAHO adjudicatory authority, whenever the CAHO is absent.
The regs repeatedly assign specific powers to "the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer."
The regs repeatedly assign specific powers to "the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer."
Hermits VS Hordes | Left 4 Dead 2 Livestream 18/06/25
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAHO...
#co-op #horror #left4dead
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAHO...
#co-op #horror #left4dead
Hermits VS Hordes | Left 4 Dead 2 Livestream 18/06/25
YouTube video by xisumatwo
www.youtube.com
June 19, 2025 at 7:12 PM
Hermits VS Hordes | Left 4 Dead 2 Livestream 18/06/25
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAHO...
#co-op #horror #left4dead
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAHO...
#co-op #horror #left4dead
I just got a FOIA back about the EOIR's Office of Chief Administrative Hearing Officer that raises really serious questions about whether that agency is functioning lawfully. My initial review says they're not. There's no functioning CAHO.
A thread, because the documents are kind of wild. 🧵
A thread, because the documents are kind of wild. 🧵
August 24, 2026 at 4:18 PM
I just got a FOIA back about the EOIR's Office of Chief Administrative Hearing Officer that raises really serious questions about whether that agency is functioning lawfully. My initial review says they're not. There's no functioning CAHO.
A thread, because the documents are kind of wild. 🧵
A thread, because the documents are kind of wild. 🧵
Il allait, Caïn Cahan, fils de Caho.
November 26, 2025 at 10:06 PM
Il allait, Caïn Cahan, fils de Caho.
21/ So here is where things apparently stand:
James McHenry remains the CAHO.
He has been "on detail outside of OCAHO" since January 2025.
DOJ's FOIA production does not identify an Acting CAHO.
Elizabeth Vayo remains Deputy CAHO.
Yet Vayo is exercising the CAHO's adjudicatory powers.
James McHenry remains the CAHO.
He has been "on detail outside of OCAHO" since January 2025.
DOJ's FOIA production does not identify an Acting CAHO.
Elizabeth Vayo remains Deputy CAHO.
Yet Vayo is exercising the CAHO's adjudicatory powers.
August 24, 2026 at 4:39 PM
21/ So here is where things apparently stand:
James McHenry remains the CAHO.
He has been "on detail outside of OCAHO" since January 2025.
DOJ's FOIA production does not identify an Acting CAHO.
Elizabeth Vayo remains Deputy CAHO.
Yet Vayo is exercising the CAHO's adjudicatory powers.
James McHenry remains the CAHO.
He has been "on detail outside of OCAHO" since January 2025.
DOJ's FOIA production does not identify an Acting CAHO.
Elizabeth Vayo remains Deputy CAHO.
Yet Vayo is exercising the CAHO's adjudicatory powers.
18/ Vayo acknowledged the problem:
"As the CAHO remains detailed outside of the OCAHO, the Deputy CAHO is currently performing the duties of the CAHO, including the CAHO's adjudicatory duties and authority under 28 C.F.R. § 68.54."
She then VACATED the ALJ's final order and remanded the case.
"As the CAHO remains detailed outside of the OCAHO, the Deputy CAHO is currently performing the duties of the CAHO, including the CAHO's adjudicatory duties and authority under 28 C.F.R. § 68.54."
She then VACATED the ALJ's final order and remanded the case.
August 24, 2026 at 4:38 PM
18/ Vayo acknowledged the problem:
"As the CAHO remains detailed outside of the OCAHO, the Deputy CAHO is currently performing the duties of the CAHO, including the CAHO's adjudicatory duties and authority under 28 C.F.R. § 68.54."
She then VACATED the ALJ's final order and remanded the case.
"As the CAHO remains detailed outside of the OCAHO, the Deputy CAHO is currently performing the duties of the CAHO, including the CAHO's adjudicatory duties and authority under 28 C.F.R. § 68.54."
She then VACATED the ALJ's final order and remanded the case.
3/ Until January 2025, the CAHO was James McHenry. When Trump took office, McHenry left OCAHO on "detail" to serve as Acting Attorney General for a minute. My question since then has been - what's McHenry up to now? Is he still CAHO? He never appears to have come back.
August 24, 2026 at 4:21 PM
3/ Until January 2025, the CAHO was James McHenry. When Trump took office, McHenry left OCAHO on "detail" to serve as Acting Attorney General for a minute. My question since then has been - what's McHenry up to now? Is he still CAHO? He never appears to have come back.
22/ Maybe DOJ has a valid legal theory for this. I noted in my FOIA request that McHenry had been removed from the OCAHO website and no CAHO or Acting CAHO has been listed there since. So, I asked for all records to identify who is currently "Acting CAHO." They gave me Vayo's appointment records.
August 24, 2026 at 4:41 PM
22/ Maybe DOJ has a valid legal theory for this. I noted in my FOIA request that McHenry had been removed from the OCAHO website and no CAHO or Acting CAHO has been listed there since. So, I asked for all records to identify who is currently "Acting CAHO." They gave me Vayo's appointment records.
16/ And DOJ knows how to write a substitution rule when it wants one.
28 CFR 68.30(e), for example, expressly provides that when the CAHO is disqualified or recuses from administrative review, the *EOIR Director* exercises authority identical to the CAHO's.
Not the Deputy CAHO.
28 CFR 68.30(e), for example, expressly provides that when the CAHO is disqualified or recuses from administrative review, the *EOIR Director* exercises authority identical to the CAHO's.
Not the Deputy CAHO.
August 24, 2026 at 4:37 PM
16/ And DOJ knows how to write a substitution rule when it wants one.
28 CFR 68.30(e), for example, expressly provides that when the CAHO is disqualified or recuses from administrative review, the *EOIR Director* exercises authority identical to the CAHO's.
Not the Deputy CAHO.
28 CFR 68.30(e), for example, expressly provides that when the CAHO is disqualified or recuses from administrative review, the *EOIR Director* exercises authority identical to the CAHO's.
Not the Deputy CAHO.
23/ What I received was McHenry still listed as CAHO in the Org Chart but "on detail outside of OCAHO," Vayo's appointment as DEPUTY CAHO, the internal action memo from Owen, the retroactive appointment backdated to 2023, and related records.
I did not receive an order appointing Vayo Acting CAHO.
I did not receive an order appointing Vayo Acting CAHO.
August 24, 2026 at 4:43 PM
23/ What I received was McHenry still listed as CAHO in the Org Chart but "on detail outside of OCAHO," Vayo's appointment as DEPUTY CAHO, the internal action memo from Owen, the retroactive appointment backdated to 2023, and related records.
I did not receive an order appointing Vayo Acting CAHO.
I did not receive an order appointing Vayo Acting CAHO.
Queros todos meus amigos no caho hj, obrigado
September 21, 2024 at 8:50 PM
Queros todos meus amigos no caho hj, obrigado
10/ And the memo contains a remarkable history.
It says Vayo was actually selected as Deputy CAHO back in January 2023. It says OCAHO and DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel recommended that the AG formally appoint her because she would be exercising inferior-officer powers when substituting for the CAHO
It says Vayo was actually selected as Deputy CAHO back in January 2023. It says OCAHO and DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel recommended that the AG formally appoint her because she would be exercising inferior-officer powers when substituting for the CAHO
August 24, 2026 at 4:30 PM
10/ And the memo contains a remarkable history.
It says Vayo was actually selected as Deputy CAHO back in January 2023. It says OCAHO and DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel recommended that the AG formally appoint her because she would be exercising inferior-officer powers when substituting for the CAHO
It says Vayo was actually selected as Deputy CAHO back in January 2023. It says OCAHO and DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel recommended that the AG formally appoint her because she would be exercising inferior-officer powers when substituting for the CAHO
17/ Which brings us back to July 2026.
In US v. Zarco Hotels, a party invoked its right under 28 CFR 68.54 to seek administrative review of an ALJ's final order. By regulation, that must be decided by the CAHO. McHenry, who is "on detail."
Who decided it? Elizabeth Vayo.
As Deputy CAHO.
In US v. Zarco Hotels, a party invoked its right under 28 CFR 68.54 to seek administrative review of an ALJ's final order. By regulation, that must be decided by the CAHO. McHenry, who is "on detail."
Who decided it? Elizabeth Vayo.
As Deputy CAHO.
August 24, 2026 at 4:38 PM
17/ Which brings us back to July 2026.
In US v. Zarco Hotels, a party invoked its right under 28 CFR 68.54 to seek administrative review of an ALJ's final order. By regulation, that must be decided by the CAHO. McHenry, who is "on detail."
Who decided it? Elizabeth Vayo.
As Deputy CAHO.
In US v. Zarco Hotels, a party invoked its right under 28 CFR 68.54 to seek administrative review of an ALJ's final order. By regulation, that must be decided by the CAHO. McHenry, who is "on detail."
Who decided it? Elizabeth Vayo.
As Deputy CAHO.
24/ So there are some questions DOJ needs to answer:
Where has McHenry been for the last 19 months? What is he doing? Why has the actual CAHO remained away from the agency for this long?
And what legal authority permits the Deputy CAHO to exercise all of his adjudicatory powers indefinitely?
Where has McHenry been for the last 19 months? What is he doing? Why has the actual CAHO remained away from the agency for this long?
And what legal authority permits the Deputy CAHO to exercise all of his adjudicatory powers indefinitely?
August 24, 2026 at 4:45 PM
24/ So there are some questions DOJ needs to answer:
Where has McHenry been for the last 19 months? What is he doing? Why has the actual CAHO remained away from the agency for this long?
And what legal authority permits the Deputy CAHO to exercise all of his adjudicatory powers indefinitely?
Where has McHenry been for the last 19 months? What is he doing? Why has the actual CAHO remained away from the agency for this long?
And what legal authority permits the Deputy CAHO to exercise all of his adjudicatory powers indefinitely?
1/ OCAHO is a tiny DOJ adjudicatory agency. Among other things, its ALJs hear employer-sanctions cases under 8 USC 1324a and document-fraud cases under 1324c.
The regulations put OCAHO under a Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, the CAHO.
The regulations put OCAHO under a Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, the CAHO.
August 24, 2026 at 4:20 PM
1/ OCAHO is a tiny DOJ adjudicatory agency. Among other things, its ALJs hear employer-sanctions cases under 8 USC 1324a and document-fraud cases under 1324c.
The regulations put OCAHO under a Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, the CAHO.
The regulations put OCAHO under a Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, the CAHO.
Mas eu caho q td mundo ta flnd d mim oq faço
October 29, 2024 at 12:47 AM
Mas eu caho q td mundo ta flnd d mim oq faço
19/ Here's the part I find especially strange.
For the proposition that a Deputy CAHO can exercise the CAHO's adjudicatory powers whenever the CAHO is unavailable, Zarco doesn't cite a regulation granting the Deputy that authority.
It cites OCAHO's own prior decisions saying the Deputy can do it.
For the proposition that a Deputy CAHO can exercise the CAHO's adjudicatory powers whenever the CAHO is unavailable, Zarco doesn't cite a regulation granting the Deputy that authority.
It cites OCAHO's own prior decisions saying the Deputy can do it.
August 24, 2026 at 4:38 PM
19/ Here's the part I find especially strange.
For the proposition that a Deputy CAHO can exercise the CAHO's adjudicatory powers whenever the CAHO is unavailable, Zarco doesn't cite a regulation granting the Deputy that authority.
It cites OCAHO's own prior decisions saying the Deputy can do it.
For the proposition that a Deputy CAHO can exercise the CAHO's adjudicatory powers whenever the CAHO is unavailable, Zarco doesn't cite a regulation granting the Deputy that authority.
It cites OCAHO's own prior decisions saying the Deputy can do it.
Me caho en la puta intentas mirar a las esquinas superiores y te da dolor de cuello por una semana jsjs
Ok, I might have gotten myself that ridiculously large Samsung Odyssey Ark 55" curved monitor 😬
November 25, 2024 at 12:21 PM
Me caho en la puta intentas mirar a las esquinas superiores y te da dolor de cuello por una semana jsjs