Police representatives described a handheld spectrometer (NARCAM/NARCAM‑type device) that could identify substances in the field; they emphasized it establishes probable cause but lab confirmation (six‑to‑nine months for non‑detained samples) remains necessary.

Multiple public commenters and some board members raised concerns that a levy cap could reduce available revenue if state aid lags, potentially forcing difficult cuts and making property taxes less affordable for older residents.

Board members and the district attorney told the community that key implementation questions — which CPI month counts, how net new property growth is calculated, and which line items belong in an SAU budget — will be settled by DRA guidance and legal review.

Two state representatives and many residents addressed the board: supporters said the cap offers predictability for taxpayers while opponents called the bill vague and warned it could undermine local control and permanently cut programs. Speakers raised turnout, ballot timing, and equity concerns.

At an informational meeting, the Chester School Board and superintendent reviewed House Bill 1300’s formula and showed an example scenario in which the district would have needed to cut about $322,365 from this year’s budget to meet the proposed levy cap. Board members warned that required costs limit where cuts could be made.