Council discusses application process for funding a new trail from Lander to Cedar.

At the June 29 Roswell open forum, residents urged both caution and change in the 2040 comprehensive plan — opposing rezoning of single-family areas while some urged mixed-use development and workforce housing along major arterials; council offered no immediate policy changes and said written responses will be posted within two weeks.

The commission greenlights 55-townhome project to enhance walkability and density near Old Town.

Council plans text amendments to boost residential options in the H2 District for mixed use.

After a year of task-force audits and intersection ranking, the Select Board authorized the town administrator to submit a MassDOT Shared Streets grant application requesting $223,000 for temporary safety interventions at priority intersections and endorsed the Vision Zero resolution to guide long-term roadway-safety strategy.

The Glendora Planning Commission voted 4–0 to recommend the City Council approve a targeted amendment to the general plan circulation element that would encourage a 300x600-foot grid-block street pattern, 56-foot street sections and incremental street construction in the area south of the Metro A Line station.

City Council proposes adjustments to parking regulations to enhance development along Artesia corridor.

City planners and a consultant presented a redesigned comprehensive plan and draft future land use map that emphasize urban reserves, potential UGB expansion, and continued focus on walkability and services; the Commission will review a full draft in October before DLCD review.

Councilmember Kyla Clark pointed to Resolution 2-206—the bikeway master plan—as the framework for new bike lanes, trail connections and safer interconnections with neighboring municipalities.

Borough staff described a joint Clifton Heights–Lansdowne application to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection for an elevated pedestrian bridge across Darby Creek, estimated at about $2 million; council will consider a supporting resolution.

City staff told the council that a UDOT geotechnical requirement added an $87,000 change order and would likely require far greater construction cost. The council voted to reject the change order and remove the project