A presenter described the C2.2 design option as a way to make the school more compact and improve circulation, and proposed a synthetic turf playing field built over a large parking area; a committee member raised concerns about student impacts and the use of modular classrooms.

Architects and committee members spent the bulk of the Oct. 6 meeting reviewing design options for two candidate sites (Pollard and DeFazio). Discussion focused on site constraints (topography, wetlands, stormwater, parking and construction phasing), educational program trade-offs between 6–8 and 7–8 configurations, and next steps to narrow options

City officials seek additional reports on modular units and potential construction impacts.