#DFARS
Monday 10 November was CMMC Phase 2 day. Nothing happens on it.

Suspended since 13 July, Phases 3 and 4 on hold.

Still live: DFARS 252.204-7012, your SPRS score, government-led assessments.

A suspension is not a repeal. The task force report is still unpublished.
November 3, 2026 at 9:38 PM
GCC High: when you need it, and when you don't.
Commercial fits FCI. GCC can work for CUI that isn't export-controlled. GCC High is for ITAR or EAR data, or contracts that require US-only support.
Map where your CUI lives before you buy.
https://cyberneza.com/cmmc
November 6, 2026 at 3:08 PM
DoD paused CMMC Phase II, but the requirements already in your contracts still apply. 997 RFI responses show where the friction really is, and what DoD could change next.
CMMC Pause: What the DoD RFI Responses Mean for Defense Contractors
DoD paused CMMC Phase II, but NIST SP 800-171 and DFARS 252.204-7012 requirements still apply. See what 997 RFI responses reveal about CMMC costs, what a DoD task force could change next, and what…
buff.ly
November 2, 2026 at 2:28 PM
A cyber incident starts a 72-hour clock.
If CUI comes through your contract, DFARS 7012 requires a report to DoD within 72 hours of discovery. You need a DoD-approved medium assurance certificate to file it. Get it now.
https://cyberneza.com/contact
November 3, 2026 at 3:09 PM
CMMC Phase 2 is paused. Your obligations aren't. If CUI comes through your contract, DFARS 7012 still requires the 110 NIST 800-171 controls. Phase 1 self-assessments are in contracts and your SPRS score still matters. Free SPRS worksheet: https://cyberneza.com/sprs-score-worksheet #CMMC
October 31, 2026 at 4:30 PM
This article clarifies the interconnected DoD cybersecurity frameworks—DFARS 252.204-7012, CMMC 2.0, and FedRAMP Equivalence—that defense contractors must navigate for compliance.
Decoding DoD cybersecurity: CMMC, DFARS, and FedRAMP Equivalence demystified
This article clarifies the interconnected DoD cybersecurity frameworks—DFARS 252.204-7012, CMMC 2.0, and FedRAMP Equivalence—that defense contractors must navigate for compliance.
aws-news.com
October 29, 2026 at 11:09 PM
GenAI “FAR/DFARS helpdesk” for busy contracts teams: ask a clause question in plain English and get cited excerpts + draft compliant language—cutting research time and reducing compliance errors. What clause trips you up most? #DefenseTech #GovCon
October 29, 2026 at 7:32 PM
4 options on the table for CMMC. FNN: DoD's review lists them: restart Phase 2 with fewer contractors, move to NIST 800-171 Rev 3, fix CUI marking, more POA&M time. None is final. If CUI comes through your contract, DFARS 7012 still applies. https://cyberneza.com/cmmc #CMMC
October 31, 2026 at 1:00 PM
The real cost was never the certification.
DoD's CMMC RFI data, per Federal News Network: $47K average assessment cost cited by respondents. Top cost: NIST SP 800-171 controls.
The pause didn't change your contract. Start with the controls.
https://cyberneza.com/sprs-score-worksheet
November 5, 2026 at 3:11 PM
This article provides a compliance guide for Defense Industrial Base organizations navigating CMMC, DFARS, and FedRAMP requirements, emphasizing the shift from point-in-time compliance to continuous security assurance.
Decoding DoD cybersecurity: Compliance guide for DIB organizations
This article provides a compliance guide for Defense Industrial Base organizations navigating CMMC, DFARS, and FedRAMP requirements, emphasizing the shift from point-in-time compliance to continuous security assurance.
aws-news.com
October 29, 2026 at 11:08 PM
Where does CUI enter your company?
It comes through the contract: email with drawings and specs, your prime's portal, file shares, cloud storage, and files you create from it.
Every system that stores, processes or transmits CUI is in scope. Map it first.
https://cyberneza.com/cmmc
November 1, 2026 at 9:00 PM
FCI or CUI: which one does your contract bring?
FCI only: CMMC Level 1. 15 safeguarding requirements, self-assessed every year, no POA&M.
CUI: CMMC Level 2. 110 NIST SP 800-171 requirements, a POA&M closed within 180 days.
https://cyberneza.com/cmmc
November 2, 2026 at 10:17 PM
Central Florida builds for defense. We help it stay eligible.
If CUI comes through your contract: a current SPRS score, an SSP and POA&M that back it up, and a map of where your CUI lives.
Veteran-owned, 100% US-based, right here in Orlando.
https://cyberneza.com/contact
November 2, 2026 at 6:56 PM
Time Is Running Short to Update DFARS Covered Materials Clauses
Time Is Running Short to Update DFARS Covered Materials Clauses
anuary 1, 2027, is less than three months away. On that date, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.225-7052 (MAY 2024)...
www.jdsupra.com
October 22, 2026 at 5:27 PM
CMMC myth: "We're small, so it doesn't apply to us."
Fact: Company size doesn't matter. If your contract includes DFARS 7012 or a CUI flow-down from your prime, the requirements apply.
Start with your contract: https://cyberneza.com/contact
#CMMC
October 21, 2026 at 3:00 PM
ML “contract clause drift monitor” for contracting teams: compares new FAR/DFARS updates to your templates + active mods, flags impacted clauses, and drafts a change log—cut rework hours & reduce compliance misses. Pilot on 1 vehicle? #DefenseTech #GovCon
October 20, 2026 at 7:31 PM
Meta is a federal contractor. Their in-kind donation is a bribery scheme.

Congress must take action to address their violation on DFARS.
October 18, 2026 at 3:09 AM
Meta is a federal contractor. Their actions to favor one political party is called bribery.

Push Congress to evaluate those contracts and work towards getting them canceled for violating FARS/DFARS.
October 18, 2026 at 3:25 AM
Senator, Meta is a federal contractor. Why are they allowed to give in-kind donations to benefit one political party?

Isn't that called a bribery scheme? For what reason is their FARS/DFARS violation(s) not being evaluated by Congress?
October 18, 2026 at 3:14 AM
🔐 Would you play KnowledgeRoots™ Escape the GovCon Room™?

Teams solve GovCon challenges using FAR/DFARS regulations, collect numbers and letters, crack the final code and escape.

I'm exploring it as an interactive experience for GovCon conferences and summits.

Would you participate? YES or NO? 👇
October 18, 2026 at 3:11 AM
the actual realistic answer is rigorous NISPOM and DFARS clause 252.226-7003 enforcement

the non-national security stuff is a political problem of dealing with a notional trillionaire generally, but the DoD stuff is pretty straightforward
is there anyone thinking/writing about the actual mechanics of disentangling the US government from elon musk?
October 12, 2026 at 6:00 AM
Would also not be surprised if there are issues regarding complaince with DFARS 252.204-7012 and 252.204-7020. And likely NDAA Section 889 as well.
October 12, 2026 at 2:27 PM
These tools were available to Biden, if musk was correctly viewed as the threat that he was.

DFARS 209.104-1 and FAR 9.104-1 -

Determines whether a contractor possesses sufficient integrity, business ethics, management capability, and operational controls
October 12, 2026 at 11:33 AM