via The Parnas Perspective — Good evening, everyone. Happy Saturday. We have a lot to cover today, including the fact that the DOJ and I are now going back and forth on X over the Epstein files and its failure to release them. I promised you I would not stop, and this fight has now reached the Justice Department itself. Meanwhile, the Iranian government has again closed the Strait of Hormuz, there are major new developments involving ICE and the Department of Homeland Security, an update on Mitch McConnell, and much more. I

Newly released FBI notes related to the Jeffrey Epstein case have sparked accusations against Attorney General Todd Blanche, with Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu alleging illegal withholding of documents. The notes, from a 2019 interview with a South Carolina woman who accused Trump and Epstein of abuse, were allegedly withheld by the DOJ under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Critics argue the documents are not duplicative of previously released materials, with data researcher Rye Howard-Stone claiming they were uploaded by journalist Kaelan Deese. Lieu's public rebuke on social media highlights concerns about transparency, while legal experts describe the situation as 'inexcusable.' The DOJ maintains the documents are redundant, but advocates like Katie Phang argue otherwise. This controversy underscores ongoing tensions over government transparency and accountability in high-profile legal cases involving former officials.

An exclusive #NPR investigation reveals the Justice Department withheld dozens of Epstein files mentioning serious allegations against former President Trump, despite laws mandating their release.

The Epstein Files explained: what millions of DOJ documents released in 2026 reveal, what remains hidden, and why no client list emerged.

3.5 million pages. Thousands of videos. One name that the world won't let stay buried. The Department of Justice just dropped a digital earthquake, and we are sifting through the rubble. After years of silence, the DOJ transparency initiative has finally culminated in the massive production of Epstein records—a staggering 3.5 million pages detailing the criminal investigations into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. But is this total transparency, or a masterclass in institutional gatekeeping? In this episode, we go behind the scenes of the operation where over 500 federal professionals worked around the clock to process evidence that includes thousands of videos and images. We break down the controversial redaction protocols—why are some identities still obscured? While the DOJ maintains these measures are strictly to protect the privacy of victims and combat sex trafficking, the public is asking: who else is being shielded? We explore the legal justifications the department is currently drafting for their upcoming Congressional report and discuss the unprecedented mechanism allowing victims to challenge redaction errors. Whether you see this as a landmark win for the Freedom of Information or the final chapter in a long-standing cover-up, one thing is certain: the "Epstein Files" are no longer a myth. Stop guessing what's in the documents. Start listening to the facts. Join the conversation and help us hold the powerful accountable. Subscribe now and share this episode to spread the truth.

YouTube video by B.C. Begley

YouTube video by B.C. Begley

YouTube video by B.C. Begley

At least 16 files linked to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein were removed from a U.S. Justice Department public webpage

via US news | The Guardian — The Department of Justice’s blatant disregard for the constitution and attempt to hide the law is disturbing On Tuesday, a federal judge unsealed records showing that the Department of Justice tried and failed to get search warrants targeting journalists Don Lemon and Georgia Fort , as well as three protesters involved in the Cities church demonstration in St Paul, Minnesota, last winter. A court rejected the search warrants – twice. In strikingly blunt opinions, magistrate judge John Docherty s

via - Democracy Docket — A federal judge ordered the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to turn over key details behind its seizure of 2020 election records in Fulton County, Georgia — rejecting the government’s effort to keep that information secret. The post Trump DOJ must reveal details on Fulton County ballot seizure, judge orders appeared first on Democracy Docket .

via - Democracy Docket — The Trump administration’s sweeping campaign to force states to hand over sensitive voter registration data is colliding with a new revelation that could undermine its cases — and raise serious questions about whether the Department of Justice (DOJ) was fully candid in federal court. The post DOJ said it had no plans to share voter data with DHS. Guess what it’s now planning to do appeared first on Democracy Docket .