#DeathAI
LightNews LightNews
mikesacks.bsky.social
Trump’s DOJ says it will not enforce the federal law barring gun sales to 18-20 year olds because it violates the 2nd Amendment.

SCOTUS has so far declined every opportunity to resolve the circuit split.

www.justice.gov/olc/media/14...
(Slip Opinion) Application of 18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(1) and (c)(1) to Young Adults prevents young adults, who are members of "the people" to whom the Second Nation's tradition of firearm regulation, which it cannot do. September 17, 2026 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Our laws deem an eighteen-year-old "mature enough to be drafted, vote, serve as a juror, and be sentenced to deathại One such eighteen-year-old represented the United States at the Tokyo Olympics in 2020, shooting skeet? Yet, due to statutes predicated on concerns over an eighteen-year-old's ability to handle a pistol as a responsible adult, it would have been a federal felony if a licensed dealer had sold her such a firearm before she left or after she returned to her studies at the University of Texas at Arlington. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(1), (c)(1). You have asked whether that restriction may be enforced against otherwise law-abiding citizens between the ages of eighteen and twenty who seek to purchase a handgun consistent with the individual right to keep and bear arms recognized by District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), and "fleshed out," Wolford v. Lopez, 146 S. Ct. 2032, 2043 (2026), in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022). It may not. Section 922(b)(1) and (c)(1) may not be enforced to impose criminal penalties on dealers who sell handguns to a class of law-abiding adults who, in nearly every other relevant respect, are members of the political community. In sum, because the modern federal age restrictions limit young adults between the ages of eighteen and twenty from obtaining arms, they "fall[] within the plain text of the Second Amendment" and are "presumptively unconstitutional." Wolford, 146 S. Ct. at 2044. As we have not identified "any analogue or collection of analogues" that "is 'relevantly similar' to the modern law," our view is that the government is unable to overcome this presumption. Id. (quoting Bruen, 142 S. Ct. at 2132). In reaching this conclusion, we are aware that we are not writing on a government (state or federal) to bar young adults from obtaining firearms has deeply divided members of the federal bench. 42 Having carefully considered these courts' decisions, we do not think that their reasons for reaching a contrary conclusion under Bruen can be reconciled with the Court's intervening clarifications in Hemani and Wolford. 4 Thus, we do advice it gives you as you assist the President in the performance of his independent constitutional duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." U.S. Const. art. II, § 3; see also Application of the Rehabilita- Patients with Severe Mental Illness or Disabilities, 50 Op. O.L.C. _, at *12 (June 18, 2026); Section 1715 at *14; cf. Eric S. Fish, Prosecutorial Constitutionalism, 90 S. Cal. L. Rev. 237, 254 (2017) (noting that "a number of important constitutional rights go underenforced by judges"_and 42 Compare Reese, 127 F.4th 583 (invalidating the federal age restrictions at issue here), Worth, 108 F.4th 677 (invalidating Minnesota's age-based public-carry re- Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, 121 F.4th 96 (sustaining Colorado's age-based purchase restrictions). 1687. that Executive Branch officials should "supplement judges' enforcement ing processesằ_. We conclude by noting, however, a few limits on this opinion. For ex-ample, we do not address the age-neutral conditions and qualifications on commercial sales, the prohibition on the possession of handguns by those under eighteen, 18 U.S.C. § 922(x), or even the enhanced investigative period Congress has prescribed for purchasers under twenty-one, id. § 922(t) (1)(C); see also generally McRorey v. Garland, 99 F.4th 831 (5th Cir. 2024). And nothing in this opinion should be read to cast doubt on the distinct prohibitions of section 922(g), certain of which the Supreme Court has recently discussed with approval. See Hemani, 146 S. Ct. at 1692 n.6. tion as it applies to sales to persons under eighteen, who-though part of "the people" for the purposes of the Constitution-may constitutionally be subject to certain legal disabilities until they reach the age of majority, Part II.B.2; cf. Paxton, 145 S. Ct. at 2300. Instead, we conclude only that section 922(b)(1) and (c)(1) may not be enforced to impose criminal penalties on dealers who sell handguns, the "quintessential self-defense weapon," Heller, 554 U.S. at 629, to a class of the political community. T. ELLIOT GAISER Assistant Attorney General Office of Legal Counsel
September 18, 2026 at 11:34 PM
edgarallandoh.bsky.social
Why choose? With DeathAI grandma can have both.
August 28, 2025 at 11:59 PM
paladinlost.bsky.social
3. Compartmentization: Like any good cult, the first steps are often easily and gentle - you're not the one building the Gazan DeathAI, you're doing the Google Doodle games. Or you're doing code pieces, but you don't know for what. You're a few years in before you know what you're doing is wrong.
July 25, 2025 at 2:14 PM
ferchoai.bsky.social
#DarkFantasy #DarkFantasyAI #DarkFenix #FantasyAI #FantasyArt #AIPicture #AIImages #DigitalART #GenerativeART #AIArtGallery #AIGeneratedART #AIArtCommunity #KREAAi #DeathAI #Fenix #LoreNomad
December 11, 2024 at 1:21 AM